The double-edged sword of COX-2 selective NSAIDs - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

. 2002 Nov 12;167(10):1131-7.

Affiliations

Review

The double-edged sword of COX-2 selective NSAIDs

James M Wright. CMAJ. 2002.

Abstract

The launch of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective NSAIDs was based on 2 hypotheses: (1) the major adverse effects limiting the usefulness of nonselective NSAIDs are gastrointestinal in nature and (2) COX-2 selective NSAIDs are associated with fewer gastrointestinal adverse effects than nonselective NSAIDs. At the time of the launch, neither of these hypotheses had been proven and, as documented in this review, both remain uncertain. The increased incidence of total and nongastrointestinal serious adverse events, with the COX-2 selective NSAIDs as compared with nonselective NSAIDs, in the Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study (CLASS) and the Vioxx Gastrointestinal Outcomes Research (VIGOR) study remains a major concern. The increased morbidity associated with the COX-2 selective NSAIDs may be a manifestation of the COX-2 selectivity of rofecoxib and celecoxib or the supramaximal doses of these drugs used in the trials. Proof that the increased harm was not caused by the COX-2 selectivity of the drugs depends on demonstration in a randomized controlled trial that COX-2 selective NSAIDs at usual doses are as effective as nonselective NSAIDs and cause fewer gastrointestinal serious adverse events without increasing the incidence of total nongastrointestinal serious adverse events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None

Fig. 1: Meta-analysis of relative risk of total mortality with cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) compared with nonselective NSAIDs in the Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study (CLASS) , and the Vioxx Gastrointestinal Outcomes Research (VIGOR) study., CI = confidence interval, FDA = US Food and Drug Administration. *Group that received COX-2 selective NSAIDs: number of participants who were affected/total number of participants. †Group that received nonselective NSAIDs: number of participants who were affected/total number of participants.

None

Fig. 2: Meta-analysis of relative risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) (including death, admission to hospital, and any life- threatening event or event leading to serious disability) with COX-2 selective NSAIDs compared with nonselective NSAIDs in the CLASS , and the VIGOR study.,

None

Fig. 3: Meta-analysis of relative risk of complicated ulcers with COX-2 selective NSAIDs compared with nonselective NSAIDs in the CLASS , and the VIGOR study.,

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lipsky PE. Progress toward a new class of therapeutics: selective COX-2 inhibition. J Rheumatol 1997;24(Suppl 49):1-8. - PubMed
    1. Lane NE. Pain management in osteoarthritis: the role of COX-2 inhibitors. J Rheumatol 1997;24(Suppl 49):20-4. - PubMed
    1. Celecoxib (Celebrex): Is it a breakthrough drug? Ther Lett 1999;31:1-2. Available: www.ti.ubc.ca/pages/letter31.htm (accessed 2002 Sept 12)
    1. Juni P, Rutjes AWS, Dieppe PA. Are selective COX-2 inhibitors superior to traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs? Adequate analysis of the CLASS trial indicates that this may not be the case. BMJ 2002;324:1287-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silverstein FE, Faich G, Goldstein JL, Simon LS, Pincus T, Whelton A, et al. Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2000;284:1247-55. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources