Evaluation of a commercial line probe assay for identification of mycobacterium species from liquid and solid culture - PubMed (original) (raw)

Comparative Study

. 2002 Nov;21(11):794-802.

doi: 10.1007/s10096-002-0825-y. Epub 2002 Nov 7.

K De Vreese, A Devos, H Pottel, A Valgaeren, C Evans, J Norton, D Parker, L Rigouts, F Portaels, U Reischl, S Watterson, G Pfyffer, R Rossau

Affiliations

• PMID: 12461589
• DOI: 10.1007/s10096-002-0825-y

Comparative Study

Evaluation of a commercial line probe assay for identification of mycobacterium species from liquid and solid culture

W Mijs et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002 Nov.

Abstract

The performance of a commercial line probe assay (LiPA) (Inno-LiPA Mycobacteria; Innogenetics, Belgium) for the detection and identification of Mycobacterium species from liquid and solid culture was evaluated at five routine clinical laboratories. The LiPA method is based on the reverse hybridization principle, in which the mycobacterial 16S-23S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) spacer region is amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Amplicons are subsequently hybridized with oligonucleotide probes arranged on a membrane strip and detected by a colorimetric system. The test detects the presence of Mycobacterium species and specifically identifies Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, Mycobacterium kansasii, Mycobacterium xenopi, Mycobacterium gordonae, Mycobacterium avium complex, Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, Mycobacterium scrofulaceum, and Mycobacterium chelonae - Mycobacterium abscessus complex. The results of LiPA were compared with the results obtained using traditional biochemical and molecular tests (DNA probe-based techniques, PCR restriction enzyme analysis of the 65 kDa heat-shock protein gene, and sequencing of the 16S rDNA). A total of 669 isolates, 642 of which were identified as Mycobacterium species and 27 as non- Mycobacterium species, were tested by LiPA. After analysis of 14 initially discordant results and exclusion of one isolate, concordant results were obtained for 636 of 641 Mycobacterium isolates (99.2% accuracy). All Mycobacterium species reacted with the MYC ( Mycobacterium species) probe (100% sensitivity), and all non- Mycobacterium species were identified as such (100% specificity).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• Rapid identification of Mycobacteria to the species level using INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria, a reverse hybridization assay.
  Suffys PN, da Silva Rocha A, de Oliveira M, Campos CE, Barreto AM, Portaels F, Rigouts L, Wouters G, Jannes G, van Reybroeck G, Mijs W, Vanderborght B. Suffys PN, et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Dec;39(12):4477-82. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.12.4477-4482.2001. J Clin Microbiol. 2001. PMID: 11724865 Free PMC article.
• Evaluation of the LiPA MYCOBACTERIA assay for identification of mycobacterial species from BACTEC 12B bottles.
  Miller N, Infante S, Cleary T. Miller N, et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2000 May;38(5):1915-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.5.1915-1919.2000. J Clin Microbiol. 2000. PMID: 10790121 Free PMC article.
• Evaluation of the Speed-oligo® Mycobacteria assay for identification of Mycobacterium spp. from fresh liquid and solid cultures of human clinical samples.
  Quezel-Guerraz NM, Arriaza MM, Avila JA, Sánchez-Yebra Romera WE, Martínez-Lirola MJ; Indal-TB Group. Quezel-Guerraz NM, et al. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Oct;68(2):123-31. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.06.006. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20846584
• [Molecular identification of mycobacteria and detection of antibiotic resistance].
  Cattoir V. Cattoir V. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2004 Jul-Aug;62(4):405-13. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2004. PMID: 15297234 Review. French.
• [Standardization of laboratory tests for tuberculosis and their proficiency testing].
  Abe C. Abe C. Kekkaku. 2003 Aug;78(8):541-51. Kekkaku. 2003. PMID: 14509226 Review. Japanese.

Cited by

• Solid and Suspension Microarrays for Microbial Diagnostics.
  Miller S, Karaoz U, Brodie E, Dunbar S. Miller S, et al. Methods Microbiol. 2015;42:395-431. doi: 10.1016/bs.mim.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 May 14. Methods Microbiol. 2015. PMID: 38620236 Free PMC article.
• Prevalence of Mycobacterium kansasii in clinical and environmental isolates, a systematic review and meta-analysis.
  Narimisa N, Bostanghadiri N, Goodarzi F, Razavi S, Jazi FM. Narimisa N, et al. Front Microbiol. 2024 Feb 19;15:1321273. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1321273. eCollection 2024. Front Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 38440139 Free PMC article.
• Misidentification of Mycobacterium smegmatis as Mycobacterium fortuitum by DNA line probe assay.
  Fida M, Beam E, Wengenack NL. Fida M, et al. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2021 Aug 26;25:100268. doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2021.100268. eCollection 2021 Dec. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2021. PMID: 34522793 Free PMC article.
• Whole-Genome Sequencing Analysis to Identify Infection with Multiple Species of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria.
  Khieu V, Ananta P, Kaewprasert O, Laohaviroj M, Namwat W, Faksri K. Khieu V, et al. Pathogens. 2021 Jul 11;10(7):879. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10070879. Pathogens. 2021. PMID: 34358029 Free PMC article.
• Rapid identification of mycobacteria from positive MGIT broths of primary cultures by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
  Huang TS, Lee CC, Tu HZ, Lee SS. Huang TS, et al. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 2;13(2):e0192291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192291. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29394275 Free PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Springer