The misuse of statistics: concepts, tools, and a research agenda - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2002 Apr-Jun;9(2):65-74.
doi: 10.1080/08989620212968.
Affiliations
- PMID: 12625352
- DOI: 10.1080/08989620212968
The misuse of statistics: concepts, tools, and a research agenda
John S Gardenier et al. Account Res. 2002 Apr-Jun.
Abstract
This paper presents concerns regarding misuse of statistics in scientific work, especially in biomedical research. The paper discusses what is meant by "misuse." It appears that misuse arises from various sources: degrees of competence in statistical theory and methods, honest error in the application of methods, egregious negligence, and deliberate deception (misconduct.) The incidence of error is partly due to a perceived need to meet artificial statistical criteria for acceptance of research reports for publication by journals. There has been no systematic research into the prevalence of misuse or its breakdown by type. Nonetheless, there are ways to encourage, or even to enforce, good statistical practice. These can be greatly supported by use of available statistical ethics documents. This article suggests lines of further research that could define the problem more explicitly and that might lead to additional corrective measures.
Similar articles
- Research integrity and publication ethics.
Beisiegel U. Beisiegel U. Atherosclerosis. 2010 Oct;212(2):383-5. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.01.050. Epub 2010 Feb 18. Atherosclerosis. 2010. PMID: 20692660 - Publish or be damned.
Vines G. Vines G. New Sci. 1997 Sep 13;155(2099):53. New Sci. 1997. PMID: 16127834 No abstract available. - Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK. Woolf PK. Jurimetrics. 1988 Fall;29(1):67-95. Jurimetrics. 1988. PMID: 11654908 Review. No abstract available. - [Ethics in articles published in medical journals].
Reyes H, Palma J, Andresen M. Reyes H, et al. Rev Med Chil. 2007 Apr;135(4):529-33. Epub 2007 May 16. Rev Med Chil. 2007. PMID: 17554464 Review. Spanish. - [Misconduct in clinical scientific investigations].
De Broe ME. De Broe ME. Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2004;66(5-6):335-41. Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2004. PMID: 15641564 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
- Basics, common errors and essentials of statistical tools and techniques in anesthesiology research.
Bajwa SJ. Bajwa SJ. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Oct-Dec;31(4):547-53. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.169087. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015. PMID: 26702217 Free PMC article. - Rejoinder to McNeish and Mislevy: What Does Psychological Measurement Require?
Sijtsma K, Ellis JL, Borsboom D. Sijtsma K, et al. Psychometrika. 2024 Dec;89(4):1175-1185. doi: 10.1007/s11336-024-10004-7. Epub 2024 Oct 30. Psychometrika. 2024. PMID: 39472365 Free PMC article. - Statistical errors in articles published in radiology journals.
Günel Karadeniz P, Uzabacı E, Atış Kuyuk S, Kaskır Kesin F, Can FE, Seçil M, Ercan İ. Günel Karadeniz P, et al. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019 Mar;25(2):102-108. doi: 10.5152/dir.2018.18148. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30582574 Free PMC article. - Bias in research.
Simundić AM. Simundić AM. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2013;23(1):12-5. doi: 10.11613/bm.2013.003. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2013. PMID: 23457761 Free PMC article. - Is it time to revise the definition of research misconduct?
Resnik DB. Resnik DB. Account Res. 2019 Feb;26(2):123-137. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1570156. Epub 2019 Feb 1. Account Res. 2019. PMID: 30649967 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical