Clinical team functioning and IT innovation: a study of the diffusion of a point-of-care online evidence system - PubMed (original) (raw)

. 2003 May-Jun;10(3):244-51.

doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1285. Epub 2003 Jan 28.

Affiliations

Clinical team functioning and IT innovation: a study of the diffusion of a point-of-care online evidence system

A Sophie Gosling et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the association between clinical team functioning and diffusion (awareness, use, and impact) of a 24-hour online evidence retrieval system. To examine the relationships between clinical team characteristics and the adoption of the online evidence system.

Design: 18 clinical teams, consisting of 180 clinicians from three Australian hospitals, were identified and studied. Teams were categorized as small (<or= 15 members) or large (> 15).

Measurements: Clinical team functioning was assessed using the Team Climate Inventory (TCI). Awareness, use, and impact of an online evidence retrieval system were measured using a self-administered questionnaire. The relationships between TCI scores and awareness, use, and impact were examined using t-tests and one-way ANOVAs. Chi square analyses were used to examine differences between small and large teams. RESULTS were interpreted within a diffusion of innovations framework.

Results: Clinical team functioning was not related to awareness or use of the online evidence retrieval system. However, clinical team functioning was significantly associated with the impact of online evidence in terms of reported experience of improved patient care following system use. Clinicians in small teams (<or= 15 members) had higher levels of system awareness compared to large (> 15) teams.

Conclusions: Team functioning had the greatest impact on the fourth stage of innovation diffusion, the effective use of online evidence for clinical care. This supports Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory, to the effect that different types of communication about an innovation are important at different stages in the diffusion process. Members of small teams were more aware of the system than members of large teams. Team functioning is amenable to improvement through interventions. The findings suggest that the role of team climate in the diffusion of information systems is a promising area for future research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Borrill C, West M, Shapiro D, Rees A. Team working and effectiveness in health care. Br J Health Care Manage 2000; 6(8):364–371.
    1. Jones R. Team working in primary care: How do we know about it? J Interprof Care 1992;6:25–9.
    1. Sommers L, Marton K, Barbaccia J, Randolph J. Physician, nurse, and social worker collaboration in primary care for chronically ill seniors. Arch Intern Med 2000;160(12): 1825–1833. - PubMed
    1. Zimmer J, Eggert G, Chiverton P. Individual versus team case management in optimizing community care for chronically ill patients with dementia. J Aging Health 1990;2:357–372. - PubMed
    1. Hearn J, Higgingson I. Do specialist palliative care teams improve outcomes for cancer patients: A systematic literature review. Palliat Med 1998;12(5):317–332. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources