Teicoplanin therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill patients: a retrospective study emphasizing the importance of a loading dose - PubMed (original) (raw)
doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg147. Epub 2003 Feb 25.
Affiliations
- PMID: 12654757
- DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkg147
Teicoplanin therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill patients: a retrospective study emphasizing the importance of a loading dose
Federico Pea et al. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Apr.
Abstract
Data obtained as part of our routine drug monitoring of teicoplanin therapy (therapeutic drug monitoring, TDM) in adult critically ill patients being treated for suspected or documented Gram-positive multiresistant infections were assessed, retrospectively. Data were available for 202 patients (146 male, 56 female; age 58 +/- 16 years) with a total number of 829 teicoplanin trough plasma levels (C(min)) assessed. The percentage of patients with adequate teicoplanin concentrations (C(min) >/= 10 mg/L) during the treatment period substantially increased from 3.2% on day 2, to 35%, 70%, 90% and approximately 95% on days 4, 7, 11 and 15, respectively. The findings suggest that optimal teicoplanin therapy was achieved only after at least 4, and probably 7, days of therapy in most cases, mainly because of a failure to use an appropriate loading dose. Among the possible causes for the reluctance to use a loading dose, concern over the potential nephrotoxicity of teicoplanin was a major factor. We conclude that loading doses of teicoplanin (6 mg/kg every 12 h for at least three doses) must be considered mandatory in all patients, regardless of their renal function, to enable optimal drug concentrations to be achieved early in the treatment period. Subsequently, TDM is important to ensure that dose regimens are optimized to the individual requirements of the patients.
Similar articles
- Recommendations to achieve rapid therapeutic teicoplanin plasma concentrations in adult hospitalised patients treated for sepsis.
Brink AJ, Richards GA, Cummins RR, Lambson J; Gauteng Understanding Teicoplanin Serum levels (GUTS) study group. Brink AJ, et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008 Nov;32(5):455-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.05.012. Epub 2008 Aug 20. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008. PMID: 18718742 Clinical Trial. - The effect of multifactorial, multidisciplinary educational interventions on appropriate use of teicoplanin.
Pea F, Viale P, Pavan F, Tavio M, Poz D, Beltrame A, Furlanut M. Pea F, et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006 Apr;27(4):344-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.11.012. Epub 2006 Mar 22. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006. PMID: 16554146 - Loading dose required to achieve rapid therapeutic teicoplanin trough plasma concentration in patients with multidrug-resistant gram-positive infections.
Wang JT, Liao HI, Wu Lin FL, Chang SC. Wang JT, et al. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012 May;110(5):416-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2012.00862.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012. PMID: 22309355 Clinical Trial. - [Level of evidence for therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplatin].
Boulamery A, Venisse N, Le Guellec C; Groupe Suivi Therapeutique Pharmacologique de la Societe Francaise de Pharmacologie et de Therapeutique. Boulamery A, et al. Therapie. 2011 Jan-Feb;66(1):45-50. doi: 10.2515/therapie/2011003. Epub 2011 Apr 7. Therapie. 2011. PMID: 21466777 Review. French. - Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.
Wilson AP. Wilson AP. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000 Sep;39(3):167-83. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200039030-00001. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000. PMID: 11020133 Review.
Cited by
- Loading regimen required to rapidly achieve therapeutic trough plasma concentration of teicoplanin and evaluation of clinical features.
Seki M, Yabuno K, Miyawaki K, Miwa Y, Tomono K. Seki M, et al. Clin Pharmacol. 2012;4:71-5. doi: 10.2147/CPAA.S37528. Epub 2012 Nov 27. Clin Pharmacol. 2012. PMID: 23236257 Free PMC article. - Clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplanin: a consensus review by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.
Hanai Y, Takahashi Y, Niwa T, Mayumi T, Hamada Y, Kimura T, Matsumoto K, Fujii S, Takesue Y. Hanai Y, et al. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Mar 31;77(4):869-879. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab499. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022. PMID: 35022752 Free PMC article. - Optimal Teicoplanin Dosage Regimens in Critically Ill Patients: Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Simulations Based on Renal Function and Infection Type.
Wang Y, Yao F, Chen S, Ouyang X, Lan J, Wu Z, Wang Y, Chen J, Wang X, Chen C. Wang Y, et al. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2023 Aug 1;17:2259-2271. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S413662. eCollection 2023. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2023. PMID: 37546521 Free PMC article. - Necessity for higher teicoplanin doses in older adults: a multicenter prospective observational study in China.
Liu T, Wu J, Na P, Wu X, Yuan Y, Wang C, Ma X, Qi L, Chen X, Rao W, Duan Z, Fang X, Xie L, Li H. Liu T, et al. BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 4;24(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05091-1. BMC Geriatr. 2024. PMID: 38831261 Free PMC article. - Personalized Medicine for Antibiotics: The Role of Nanobiosensors in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.
Garzón V, Bustos RH, G Pinacho D. Garzón V, et al. J Pers Med. 2020 Sep 25;10(4):147. doi: 10.3390/jpm10040147. J Pers Med. 2020. PMID: 32993004 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical