The mind's eye: functional MR imaging evaluation of golf motor imagery - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2003 Jun-Jul;24(6):1036-44.
Affiliations
- PMID: 12812924
- PMCID: PMC8149015
The mind's eye: functional MR imaging evaluation of golf motor imagery
Jeffrey S Ross et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 Jun-Jul.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Mental imagery involves rehearsing or practicing a task in the mind with no physical movement. The technique is commonly used, but the actual physical foundation of imagery has not been evaluated for the fast, complex, automatic motor movement of the golf swing. This study evaluated motor imagery of the golf swing, of golfers of various handicaps, by using functional MR imaging to assess whether areas of brain activation could be defined by this technique and to define any association between activated brain areas and golf skill.
Methods: Six golfers of various handicap levels were evaluated with functional MR imaging during a control condition and during mental imagery of their golf swing. Two control conditions were evaluated--"rest" and "wall"--and were then subtracted from the experimental condition to give the functional activation map. These control conditions were then tested against the golf imagery; the participants were told to mentally rehearse their golf swings from a first person perspective. The percentages of activated pixels in 137 defined regions of interest were calculated.
Results: The "rest-versus-golf" paradigm showed activation in motor cortex, parietal cortex, frontal lobe, cerebellum, vermis, and action planning areas (frontal and parietal cortices, supplementary motor area, cerebellum) and areas involved with error detection (cerebellum). Vermis, supplementary motor area, cerebellum, and motor regions generally showed the greatest activation. Little activation was seen in the cingulate gyrus, right temporal lobe, deep gray matter, and brain stem. A correlation existed between increased number of areas of activation and increased handicap.
Conclusion: This study showed the feasibility of defining areas of brain activation during imagery of a complex, coordinated motor task. Decreased brain activation occurred with increased golf skill level for the supplementary motor area and cerebellum with little activation of basal ganglia.
Figures
Fig 1.
Areas of brain activation for the participant with a handicap of 13, rest-versus-golf paradigm for 1.5 T (left) and 3.0 T (right), show a similar pattern for both field strengths. Areas of brain activation are shown overlaid on the axial view images of the brain.
Fig 2.
Areas of brain activation compared for the participants with handicaps (hcp) of 13 (upper panel) and 0 (lower panel), wall-versus-golf paradigm. Image of the participant with a handicap of 13 can also be compared with the other paradigm shown in Figure 1. The wall-versus-golf paradigm shows overall diminished brain activation, with much less activation in the better player.
Fig 3.
Schematic of regions of interest drawn for each participant. The brain regions are shown for each typical section of the functional MR imaging data set, proceeding as in Figures 1 and 2 from the top of the brain at top left to the base of the brain at bottom right. F, frontal lobe; M, motor; S, sensory; P, parietal; Sma, supplementary motor area; C, cingulated; B, basal ganglia; T, temporal lobe; O, occipital lobe; Ce, cerebellar hemisphere; Br, brain stem; V, vermis of cerebellum.
Fig 4.
Percent area of activation in the participant with a handicap of 13. Data shown represent an average of the percentage area of activation from five separate experiments of the rest-versus-golf paradigm and are sorted from the highest level of activation to the lowest. Vermis of cerebellum, supplementary motor area, motor areas, and cerebellar hemispheres show the greatest activation. R, right; L, left; SMA, supplementary motor area.
Fig 5.
All data from the rest-versus-golf paradigm are sorted by areas of activation using the data from the participant with a handicap of 13 from the rest-versus-golf paradigm as a template. R, right; L, left; SMA, supplementary motor area.
Fig 6.
Wall-versus-golf paradigm data sorted by areas of activation using the data from the participant with a handicap of 13 as a template, as in Figure 5. R, right; L, left; SMA, supplementary motor area.
Fig 7.
Activation of wall-versus-golf paradigm of ≥2%. The greatest activation in multiple areas occurred in the participant with the highest handicap. R, right; L, left; SMA, supplementary motor area.
Fig 8.
Fused functional and 3D T1 gradient-echo data for three participants spanning the handicap (HCP) range show increased activation along the motor cortex in the participant with the highest handicap.
Fig 9.
Fused functional and 3D T1 gradient-echo data show mesial surface of right hemisphere, with increasing supplementary motor area activation correlated with increasing handicap (HCP).
Comment in
- Unlocking the mental aspects of the golf swing: can functional MR imaging give us insights?
Quencer RM, Winters RK, Leadbetter D. Quencer RM, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 Jun-Jul;24(6):1033-4. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003. PMID: 12812921 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Neural representations involved in observed, imagined, and imitated actions are dissociable and hierarchically organized.
Macuga KL, Frey SH. Macuga KL, et al. Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2798-807. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.083. Epub 2011 Oct 8. Neuroimage. 2012. PMID: 22005592 Free PMC article. - Brain networks governing the golf swing in professional golfers.
Kim JH, Han JK, Kim BN, Han DH. Kim JH, et al. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(19):1980-7. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1022570. Epub 2015 Mar 12. J Sports Sci. 2015. PMID: 25761601 - Unlocking the mental aspects of the golf swing: can functional MR imaging give us insights?
Quencer RM, Winters RK, Leadbetter D. Quencer RM, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 Jun-Jul;24(6):1033-4. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003. PMID: 12812921 Free PMC article. No abstract available. - The "handwriting brain": a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of motor versus orthographic processes.
Planton S, Jucla M, Roux FE, Démonet JF. Planton S, et al. Cortex. 2013 Nov-Dec;49(10):2772-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Jun 12. Cortex. 2013. PMID: 23831432 Review. - Imaging motor imagery: methodological issues related to expertise.
Milton J, Small SL, Solodkin A. Milton J, et al. Methods. 2008 Aug;45(4):336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.05.002. Epub 2008 Jun 2. Methods. 2008. PMID: 18762138 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- Brain mechanisms discriminating enactive mental simulations of running and plogging.
Philips R, Baeken C, Billieux J, Harris JM, Maurage P, Muela I, Öz İT, Pabst A, Sescousse G, Vögele C, Brevers D. Philips R, et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Aug 15;45(12):e26807. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26807. Hum Brain Mapp. 2024. PMID: 39185739 Free PMC article. - Psychophysiological strategies for enhancing performance through imagery-skin conductance level analysis in guided vs. self-produced imagery.
Budnik-Przybylska D, Syty P, Kaźmierczak M, Przybylski J, Doliński Ł, Łabuda M, Jasik P, Kastrau A, di Fronso S, Bertollo M. Budnik-Przybylska D, et al. Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 2;14(1):5197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55743-w. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38431722 Free PMC article. - Limb Preference and Skill Level Dependence During the Imagery of a Whole-Body Movement: A Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy Study.
Wriessnegger SC, Unterhauser K, Bauernfeind G. Wriessnegger SC, et al. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jun 6;16:900834. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.900834. eCollection 2022. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35734351 Free PMC article. - Exercise Intensity and Brain Plasticity: What's the Difference of Brain Structural and Functional Plasticity Characteristics Between Elite Aerobic and Anaerobic Athletes?
Zhang K, Jan YK, Liu Y, Zhao T, Zhang L, Liu R, Liu J, Cao C. Zhang K, et al. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Feb 22;16:757522. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.757522. eCollection 2022. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35273485 Free PMC article. - Stabilometric Correlates of Motor and Motor Imagery Expertise.
Di Rienzo F, Joassy P, Ferreira Dias Kanthack T, Moncel F, Mercier Q, Collet C, Guillot A. Di Rienzo F, et al. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jan 13;15:741709. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.741709. eCollection 2021. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35095444 Free PMC article.
References
- Ogawa S, Lee TM, Nayak AS, Glynn P. Oxygenation-sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:68–78 - PubMed
- Thesen S, Heid O, Mueller E, Schad LR. Prospective acquisition correction for head motion with image-based tracking for real-time fMRI. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:457–465 - PubMed
- Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997;16:187–198 - PubMed
- Cabral B, Cam N, Foran J. Accelerated volume rendering and tomographic reconstruction using texture mapping hardware[conference proceeding]. Symposium on Volume Visualization 1994;91–98
- Fishman EK, Magid D, Ney DR, et al. Three-dimensional imaging. Radiology 1991;181:321–337 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical