The national practice for patients receiving radiation therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: results of the 1996-1999 Patterns of Care Study - PubMed (original) (raw)
The national practice for patients receiving radiation therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: results of the 1996-1999 Patterns of Care Study
Mohan Suntharalingam et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003.
Abstract
Purpose: A Patterns of Care Study (PCS) was conducted to evaluate the standards of practice for patients receiving radiation therapy for esophageal cancer from 1996 to 1999. This study examined the evaluation and treatment schemes used during this time and compared these results to the PCS data obtained between 1992 and 1994 to identify any fundamental changes in national practice.
Methods: A national survey was conducted using a two-stage cluster sampling technique. Specific information was collected on 414 patients with esophageal cancer who received radiotherapy (RT) as part of definitive or adjuvant management at 59 institutions. Patients were staged according to the 1983 AJCC. Eligibility criteria for case review included RT between 1996 and 1999, no evidence of distant metastasis (including CT evidence of either supraclavicular or celiac nodes >1 cm), squamous cell or adenocarcinoma histology, Karnofsky performance status >60, tumors in the thoracic esophagus with <2 cm extension into the stomach, and no prior malignancies within the last 5 years. Statistical analysis was performed on the database using SUDAAN software to accurately reflect the type of sampling technique used by PCS. For the purpose of this analysis, institutions were stratified as either large or small based on the number of new cases seen each year. For the purposes of comparison, the 1992-1994 PCS esophageal survey results were subjected to the same statistical procedures and tests.
Results: The median age of patients was 64 years. Seventy-seven percent were male, and 23% were female. Karnofsky performance status was >or=80% in 85% of patients. The racial profile mirrors the previous survey with 75% Caucasian, 21% African-American, 3% Asian, and <1% Hispanic. A review of the histology revealed a nearly 50:50 split between squamous cell and adenocarcinoma. Sixteen percent were clinical Stage I, 39% clinical Stage II, and 33% clinical Stage III according to the 1983 AJCC system. Workup included endoscopy (96%), CT of the chest (87%), CT of the abdomen (75%), and esophagram (64%). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was used in 18% of cases as compared to <2% in the original survey (p < 0.0001). Patients treated at large centers were more likely to undergo EUS than those treated at small centers (23% vs. 12%, p = 0.047). Fifty-six percent of patients received concurrent chemoradiation as definitive treatment. There was a significant increase in the use of concurrent chemoradiation before planned surgical resection as compared to the original survey (27% vs. 10%, p = 0.007). Other schemes included RT alone (10%), postoperative RT (1%), and postoperative chemoradiation (5%). Forty-six percent of patients with adenocarcinoma underwent trimodality therapy as compared to 19% with squamous cell carcinomas (p = 0.0002). Patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation were more likely to have had an EUS. The median total dose of external RT was 50.4 Gy, and the median dose per fraction was 1.8 Gy. Brachytherapy was used in 6% of cases. The chemotherapy agents most commonly used included 5-fluorouracil (82%), cisplatin (67%), and paclitaxel (22%). Paclitaxel was more commonly employed as part of a preoperative chemoradiation regimen than in the setting of definitive chemoradiation (46% vs. 12%, p = 0.03). Compared to the original survey, paclitaxel use significantly increased between 1996 and 1999 (0.2% vs. 22%, p = 0.001).
Conclusions: The Patterns of Care Survey confirms the use of concurrent chemoradiation as part of the national standards of practice for the management of esophageal cancer patients. A comparison with the previous study documents the significant rise in the use of EUS, preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery, and the increasing use of paclitaxel as part of a combined modality regimen.
Similar articles
- The evaluation and treatment of patients receiving radiation therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care Study.
Coia LR, Minsky BD, John MJ, Haller DG, Landry J, Pisansky TM, Willett CG, Hoffman JP, Berkey BA, Owen JB, Hanks GE. Coia LR, et al. Cancer. 1999 Jun 15;85(12):2499-505. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990615)85:12<2499::aid-cncr2>3.0.co;2-t. Cancer. 1999. PMID: 10375094 - Outcome of patients receiving radiation for cancer of the esophagus: results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care Study.
Coia LR, Minsky BD, Berkey BA, John MJ, Haller D, Landry J, Pisansky TM, Willett CG, Hoffman JP, Owen JB, Hanks GE. Coia LR, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;18(3):455-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.3.455. J Clin Oncol. 2000. PMID: 10653860 - Esophagectomy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves locoregional control in clinical stage II or III esophageal cancer patients.
Liao Z, Zhang Z, Jin J, Ajani JA, Swisher SG, Stevens CW, Ho L, Smythe R, Vaporciyan AA, Putnam JB Jr, Walsh GL, Roth JA, Yao JC, Allen PK, Cox JD, Komaki R. Liao Z, et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Dec 1;60(5):1484-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.056. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004. PMID: 15590179 - Esophageal cancer.
Coia LR, Sauter ER. Coia LR, et al. Curr Probl Cancer. 1994 Jul-Aug;18(4):189-247. doi: 10.1016/0147-0272(94)90007-8. Curr Probl Cancer. 1994. PMID: 7533069 Review. - Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a review of meta-analyses.
Wijnhoven BP, van Lanschot JJ, Tilanus HW, Steyerberg EW, van der Gaast A. Wijnhoven BP, et al. World J Surg. 2009 Dec;33(12):2606-14. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0223-z. World J Surg. 2009. PMID: 19760309 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- Combined modality therapy of cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer: the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.
Kountourakis P, Correa AM, Hofstetter WL, Lee JH, Bhutani MS, Rice DC, Komaki R, Maru DM, Ross WA, Vaporciyan A, Swisher SG, Ajani JA. Kountourakis P, et al. Cancer. 2011 Mar 1;117(5):925-30. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25651. Epub 2010 Oct 19. Cancer. 2011. PMID: 20960497 Free PMC article. - The prognostic value of clinical and pathologic factors in esophageal adenocarcinoma: a mayo cohort of 796 patients with extended follow-up after surgical resection.
Yoon HH, Khan M, Shi Q, Cassivi SD, Wu TT, Quevedo JF, Burch PA, Sinicrope FA, Diasio RB. Yoon HH, et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Dec;85(12):1080-9. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0421. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010. PMID: 21123634 Free PMC article. - Prognostic impact of body mass index stratified by smoking status in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Yoon HH, Lewis MA, Shi Q, Khan M, Cassivi SD, Diasio RB, Sinicrope FA. Yoon HH, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 1;29(34):4561-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.1260. Epub 2011 Oct 11. J Clin Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21990414 Free PMC article. - Shifting practice in definitive chemoradiation for localized esophageal cancer.
Qu XM, Biagi JJ, Hopman WM, Mahmud A. Qu XM, et al. Curr Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(5):e379-e387. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3677. Epub 2017 Oct 25. Curr Oncol. 2017. PMID: 29089808 Free PMC article. - Association of HER2/ErbB2 expression and gene amplification with pathologic features and prognosis in esophageal adenocarcinomas.
Yoon HH, Shi Q, Sukov WR, Wiktor AE, Khan M, Sattler CA, Grothey A, Wu TT, Diasio RB, Jenkins RB, Sinicrope FA. Yoon HH, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jan 15;18(2):546-54. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2272. Clin Cancer Res. 2012. PMID: 22252257 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical