Participating in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS): a qualitative study of patients' experiences - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2003 May;53(490):394-8.
Affiliations
- PMID: 12830569
- PMCID: PMC1314601
Participating in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS): a qualitative study of patients' experiences
Julia Lawton et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2003 May.
Abstract
The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) is one of the longest and largest clinical trials ever conducted. It explored the effects of intensive blood glucose and blood pressure control on the development of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients took part in this trial for up to 20 years and the drop-out rate was extremely low. The aim of this discussion paper is to explore patients' motivations for joining the UKPDS and for remaining in the trial, and to examine the implications of findings for good practice before, during, and after clinical trials. A qualitative, exploratory study was undertaken, involving former UKPDS patients (n = 10) at Northampton General Hospital, England. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were undertaken and the data analysed using grounded theory approaches. The results showed that patients were motivated to join the UKPDS because they believed this would give them the best clinical care and reduce the threat of the disease. However, all of the patients identified unanticipated benefits of trial participation, to which they attributed their strong commitment to the UKPDS. These included the reassurance provided by regular clinical examinations, the personal nature of clinical care, and the welcome discipline imposed by UKPDS professionals. Transition back to primary care at trial closure could be a lonely experience, despite follow-up being seen as competent. Practitioners involved in recruiting patients for clinical trials should be aware that participants may be motivated by the desire for better clinical care, irrespective of randomisation consequences. Those taking back the clinical care of trial participants with chronic disease may wish to consider a 're-entry' interview, to minimise trial bereavement.
Comment in
- Are we better than we can say? Altruism in general practice.
Murray TH. Murray TH. Br J Gen Pract. 2003 May;53(490):355-7. Br J Gen Pract. 2003. PMID: 12830561 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Education and self-management for people newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study of patients' views.
Ockleford E, Shaw RL, Willars J, Dixon-Woods M. Ockleford E, et al. Chronic Illn. 2008 Mar;4(1):28-37. doi: 10.1177/1742395307086673. Chronic Illn. 2008. PMID: 18322027 Clinical Trial. - Personal experiences of taking part in clinical trials - a qualitative study.
Locock L, Smith L. Locock L, et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Sep;84(3):303-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Jul 6. Patient Educ Couns. 2011. PMID: 21737226 - Long-term follow-up after tight control of blood pressure in type 2 diabetes.
Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Neil HA, Matthews DR. Holman RR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1565-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806359. Epub 2008 Sep 10. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18784091 Clinical Trial. - The UKPDS and its global impact.
Genuth S. Genuth S. Diabet Med. 2008 Aug;25 Suppl 2:57-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02504.x. Diabet Med. 2008. PMID: 18717981 Review. - Implications of the UK prospective diabetes study: questions answered and issues remaining.
Mooradian AD, Chehade J. Mooradian AD, et al. Drugs Aging. 2000 Mar;16(3):159-64. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200016030-00001. Drugs Aging. 2000. PMID: 10803856 Review.
Cited by
- "I Can Remember Sort of Vivid People…but to Me They Were Plasticine." Delusions on the Intensive Care Unit: What Do Patients Think Is Going On?
Darbyshire JL, Greig PR, Vollam S, Young JD, Hinton L. Darbyshire JL, et al. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 20;11(4):e0153775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153775. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27096605 Free PMC article. - Challenges of maintaining research protocol fidelity in a clinical care setting: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of patients and staff participating in a randomized controlled trial.
Lawton J, Jenkins N, Darbyshire JL, Holman RR, Farmer AJ, Hallowell N. Lawton J, et al. Trials. 2011 May 4;12:108. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-108. Trials. 2011. PMID: 21542916 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study.
Au CP, Fardell N, Williams M, Fraser-Bell S, Campain A, Gillies M. Au CP, et al. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul 23;15:80. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0071-6. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015. PMID: 26202164 Free PMC article. - Disseminating results to clinical trial participants: a qualitative review of patient understanding in a post-trial population.
Darbyshire JL, Price HC. Darbyshire JL, et al. BMJ Open. 2012 Sep 24;2(5):e001252. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001252. Print 2012. BMJ Open. 2012. PMID: 23012330 Free PMC article. - Reasons for and reservations about research participation in acutely injured adults.
Irani E, Richmond TS. Irani E, et al. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015 Mar;47(2):161-9. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12120. Epub 2015 Jan 19. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015. PMID: 25599886 Free PMC article.
References
- Patient Educ Couns. 1999 May;37(1):65-79 - PubMed
- Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Sep;49(446):692-4 - PubMed
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000541 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2000 Oct 7;321(7265):867-71 - PubMed
- Ann Oncol. 2000 Aug;11(8):939-45 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical