Continuation of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia - PubMed (original) (raw)
Clinical Trial
Continuation of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia
Richard G Wunderink et al. Clin Ther. 2003 Mar.
Abstract
Background: The clinical efficacy and tolerability of linezolid were demonstrated in a previously published, randomized, double-blind, registration study comparing linezolid with vancomycin for the empiric treatment of 396 patients with nosocomial pneumonia.
Objectives: The aims of this study were to obtain additional experience with linezolid and vancomycin in patients with nosocomial pneumonia and to satisfy international regulatory requirements.
Methods: Patients with pneumonia acquired after 48 hours in an inpatient facility were randomly assigned to receive either IV linezolid 600 mg or IV vancomycin 1 g every 12 hours for 7 to 21 consecutive days. Patients also received IV aztreonam 1 to 2 g every 8 hours, which could be discontinued if gram-negative pathogens were not identified. The primary efficacy variables were clinical and microbiologic outcomes in evaluable patients at the follow-up visit 15 to 21 days after the end of therapy. Results from the continuation study were analyzed separately and did not include patients from the previously reported study.
Results: A total of 623 patients were enrolled: 321 in the linezolid group and 302 in the vancomycin group. Mean (SD) ages were 63.1 (19.1) years and 61.9 (19.3) years, respectively. Mean (SD) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores were 14.1 (5.8) and 14.1 (6.2), respectively. There were no significant differences between the linezolid and vancomycin groups at the follow-up visit in clinical cure rates (114/168 [67.9%] and 111/171 [64.9%]) or microbiologic success rates (47/76 [61.8%] and 42/79 [53.2%]) in evaluable patients (excluding those who had indeterminate or missing outcomes). There were also no significant differences in the rates of all drug-related adverse events (14.0% and 14.0%) or those that occurred in > 1% of patients, including diarrhea (3.7% and 3.0%), nausea (0.3% and 1.3%), and rash (0.6% and 1.7%) in the linezolid and vancomycin groups, respectively.
Conclusion: In the population studied, linezolid appeared to be as well tolerated and as effective as vancomycin, each in combination with aztreonam.
Similar articles
- Linezolid (PNU-100766) versus vancomycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study.
Rubinstein E, Cammarata S, Oliphant T, Wunderink R; Linezolid Nosocomial Pneumonia Study Group. Rubinstein E, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Feb 1;32(3):402-12. doi: 10.1086/318486. Epub 2001 Jan 26. Clin Infect Dis. 2001. PMID: 11170948 Clinical Trial. - Linezolid vs vancomycin: analysis of two double-blind studies of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia.
Wunderink RG, Rello J, Cammarata SK, Croos-Dabrera RV, Kollef MH. Wunderink RG, et al. Chest. 2003 Nov;124(5):1789-97. Chest. 2003. PMID: 14605050 - Clinical cure and survival in Gram-positive ventilator-associated pneumonia: retrospective analysis of two double-blind studies comparing linezolid with vancomycin.
Kollef MH, Rello J, Cammarata SK, Croos-Dabrera RV, Wunderink RG. Kollef MH, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Mar;30(3):388-94. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2088-1. Epub 2004 Jan 9. Intensive Care Med. 2004. PMID: 14714107 - Linezolid versus vancomycin or teicoplanin for nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kalil AC, Murthy MH, Hermsen ED, Neto FK, Sun J, Rupp ME. Kalil AC, et al. Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep;38(9):1802-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181eb3b96. Crit Care Med. 2010. PMID: 20639754 Review.
Cited by
- Epidemiology and economic impact of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: review and analysis of the literature.
Shorr AF. Shorr AF. Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(9):751-68. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725090-00004. Pharmacoeconomics. 2007. PMID: 17803334 Review. - Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of vancomycin for the treatment of patients with gram-positive infections: focus on the study design.
Vardakas KZ, Mavros MN, Roussos N, Falagas ME. Vardakas KZ, et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Apr;87(4):349-63. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.12.011. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012. PMID: 22469348 Free PMC article. - Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients.
Tsuji Y, Holford NHG, Kasai H, Ogami C, Heo YA, Higashi Y, Mizoguchi A, To H, Yamamoto Y. Tsuji Y, et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Aug;83(8):1758-1772. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13262. Epub 2017 Mar 31. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017. PMID: 28186644 Free PMC article. - Contrasting effects of linezolid on healthy and dysfunctional human neutrophils: reducing C5a-induced injury.
Evans SJ, Roberts AEL, Morris AC, Simpson AJ, Harris LG, Mack D, Jenkins RE, Wilkinson TS. Evans SJ, et al. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 2;10(1):16377. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72454-0. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 33009444 Free PMC article. - The efficacy and safety of linezolid and glycopeptides in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections.
Fu J, Ye X, Chen C, Chen S. Fu J, et al. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058240. Epub 2013 Mar 6. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23484002 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical