Lytic versus stimulatory synapse in cytotoxic T lymphocyte/target cell interaction: manifestation of a dual activation threshold - PubMed (original) (raw)

Lytic versus stimulatory synapse in cytotoxic T lymphocyte/target cell interaction: manifestation of a dual activation threshold

Mustapha Faroudi et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003.

Abstract

Activation of biological functions in T lymphocytes is determined by the molecular dynamics occurring at the T cell/opposing cell interface. In the present study, a central question of cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) biology was studied at the single-cell level: can two distinct activation thresholds for cytotoxicity and cytokine production be explained by intercellular molecular dynamics between CTLs and targets? In this study, we combine morphological approaches with numerical analysis, which allows us to associate specific patterns of calcium mobilization with different biological responses. We show that CTLs selectively activated to cytotoxicity lack a mature immunological synapse while exhibiting a low threshold polarized secretion of lytic granules and spike-like patterns of calcium mobilization. This finding is contrasted by fully activated CTLs, which exhibit a mature immunological synapse and smooth and sustained calcium mobilization. Our results indicate that intercellular molecular dynamics and signaling characteristics allow the definition of two activation thresholds in individual CTLs: one for polarized granule secretion (lytic synapse formation) and the other for cytokine production (stimulatory synapse formation).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Spiky signaling in CTLs stimulated with low antigen concentration. (A and B) Typical calcium mobilization patterns are depicted: high concentration patterns (A) and low concentration patterns (B). (C) The ensemble average of the calcium flux over time is shown. (D) The correlation of spikiness and mean calcium flux is shown. (E) An examplatory fitting of a smooth curve to a time series is given. (F) The temporal evolution of the ensemble average of the signal pattern spikiness is depicted for both specific peptide concentrations.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

IFN-γ production and TCR down-regulation require a higher antigen concentration than cytotoxicity. CTLs were conjugated with target cells in the presence of different concentrations of pp65. Cytotoxicity (□), IFN-γ production (▵), and CD3 down-regulation (•) were measured after 4 h at 37°C. The effector-to-target cell ratio (E/T ratio) was 2:1 in the presented experiments. Similar results were obtained by using other E/T ratios (6:1, 0.6:1, 0.2:1). Data are from three independent experiments performed in duplicate for each assay. Results are expressed as means ± SD of the three experiments.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

IS formation is not required for CTL polarization toward target cells. CTLs were conjugated with EBV-B cells (red). After 10 min at 37°C cells were stained with the following antibodies. (A) Antiphosphotyrosine mAb (blue) and anti-CD2 mAb (green). (B) Antiperforin mAb (blue) and antitubulin mAb (green). APCs were either unpulsed (a–c) or pulsed with either 10 μM(d–f)or 1 nM (g–i) pp65. a, d, and g are three-color images. In b, e, and h the green color has been removed. In c, f, and i the blue color has been removed. Data are from one representative experiment of six. (Bars = 5 μM.)

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Reorientation of CTL lytic machinery in the absence of CD2 enrichment at the cell–cell contact site. T cells were pretreated with LTR before conjugation with target cells unpulsed (a–c) or pulsed with either 10 μM(d–f) or1nM(g–l) pp65. After 10 min at 37°C cells were stained with either anti-CD2 mAbs (green) and antiperforin mAbs (blue) (a–i) or antitubulin mAbs (green) and anti-perforin mAbs (blue) (j–l). a, d, g, and j are three-color images. In b, e, h, and k the green color has been removed. In c, f, i, and l the blue color has been removed. Data are from one representative experiment of three. (Bar = 5 μM.)

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Antigen dose-dependent decrease of perforin intracellular content in CTLs. (A) Staining for perforin in CTLs that have been conjugated for 2 h with EBV-B cell unpulsed or pulsed with either 10 μM or 1 nM pp65. (B) Levels of perforin staining as a function of antigen concentration. Data are from three independent experiments performed in duplicate. Results are expressed as means ± SD of the three experiments.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kagi, D., Vignaux, F., Ledermann, B., Burki, K., Depraetere, V., Nagata, S., Hengartner, H. & Golstein, P. (1994) Science 265, 528–530. - PubMed
    1. Lowin, B., Hahne, M., Mattmann, C. & Tschopp, J. (1994) Nature 370, 650–652. - PubMed
    1. Sykulev, Y., Joo, M., Vturina, I., Tsomides, T. J. & Eisen, H. N. (1996) Immunity 4, 565–571. - PubMed
    1. Sanderson, C. J. (1976) Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 192, 241–255. - PubMed
    1. Isaaz, S., Baetz, K., Olsen, K., Podack, E. & Griffiths, G. M. (1995) Eur. J. Immunol. 25, 1071–1079. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources