How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health
Catrine Tudor-Locke et al. Sports Med. 2004.
Abstract
Pedometers are simple and inexpensive body-worn motion sensors that are readily being used by researchers and practitioners to assess and motivate physical activity behaviours. Pedometer-determined physical activity indices are needed to guide their efforts. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to review the rationale and evidence for general pedometer-based indices for research and practice purposes. Specifically, we evaluate popular recommendations for steps/day and attempt to translate existing physical activity guidelines into steps/day equivalents. Also, we appraise the fragmented evidence currently available from associations derived from cross-sectional studies and a limited number of interventions that have documented improvements (primarily in body composition and/or blood pressure) with increased steps/day.A value of 10000 steps/day is gaining popularity with the media and in practice and can be traced to Japanese walking clubs and a business slogan 30+ years ago. 10000 steps/day appears to be a reasonable estimate of daily activity for apparently healthy adults and studies are emerging documenting the health benefits of attaining similar levels. Preliminary evidence suggests that a goal of 10000 steps/day may not be sustainable for some groups, including older adults and those living with chronic diseases. Another concern about using 10000 steps/day as a universal step goal is that it is probably too low for children, an important target population in the war against obesity. Other approaches to pedometer-determined physical activity recommendations that are showing promise of health benefit and individual sustainability have been based on incremental improvements relative to baseline values. Based on currently available evidence, we propose the following preliminary indices be used to classify pedometer-determined physical activity in healthy adults: (i). <5000 steps/day may be used as a 'sedentary lifestyle index'; (ii). 5000-7499 steps/day is typical of daily activity excluding sports/exercise and might be considered 'low active'; (iii). 7500-9999 likely includes some volitional activities (and/or elevated occupational activity demands) and might be considered 'somewhat active'; and (iv). >or=10000 steps/day indicates the point that should be used to classify individuals as 'active'. Individuals who take >12500 steps/day are likely to be classified as 'highly active'.
Similar articles
- Why do pedometers work?: a reflection upon the factors related to successfully increasing physical activity.
Tudor-Locke C, Lutes L. Tudor-Locke C, et al. Sports Med. 2009;39(12):981-93. doi: 10.2165/11319600-000000000-00000. Sports Med. 2009. PMID: 19902981 - How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations.
Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Aoyagi Y, Bell RC, Croteau KA, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Ewald B, Gardner AW, Hatano Y, Lutes LD, Matsudo SM, Ramirez-Marrero FA, Rogers LQ, Rowe DA, Schmidt MD, Tully MA, Blair SN. Tudor-Locke C, et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jul 28;8:80. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-80. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011. PMID: 21798044 Free PMC article. Review. - How many steps/day are enough? for children and adolescents.
Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Beets MW, Belton S, Cardon GM, Duncan S, Hatano Y, Lubans DR, Olds TS, Raustorp A, Rowe DA, Spence JC, Tanaka S, Blair SN. Tudor-Locke C, et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jul 28;8:78. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-78. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011. PMID: 21798014 Free PMC article. Review. - How many steps/day are enough? For adults.
Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Brown WJ, Clemes SA, De Cocker K, Giles-Corti B, Hatano Y, Inoue S, Matsudo SM, Mutrie N, Oppert JM, Rowe DA, Schmidt MD, Schofield GM, Spence JC, Teixeira PJ, Tully MA, Blair SN. Tudor-Locke C, et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jul 28;8:79. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-79. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011. PMID: 21798015 Free PMC article. Review. - Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity.
Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth BE, Thompson RW, Matthews CE. Tudor-Locke C, et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Dec;34(12):2045-51. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200212000-00027. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002. PMID: 12471314
Cited by
- Postoperative Kinesiophobia in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Chen Y, Peng Y, Huang X, Chen L, Lin Y. Chen Y, et al. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 22;25(8):304. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2508304. eCollection 2024 Aug. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39228507 Free PMC article. - Is public transport a promising strategy for increasing physical activity? Evidence from a study of objectively measured public transport use and physical activity.
Evans JT, Stanesby O, Blizzard L, Greaves S, Timperio A, Jose K, Sharman MJ, Palmer AJ, Cleland VJ. Evans JT, et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Aug 19;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01633-3. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024. PMID: 39160546 Free PMC article. - A social media game to increase physical activity among older adult women: protocol of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate CHALLENGE.
Robertson MC, Swartz MC, Basen-Engquist KM, Li Y, Jennings K, Thompson D, Baranowski T, Volpi E, Lyons EJ. Robertson MC, et al. BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 12;24(1):2172. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19662-9. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39135010 Free PMC article. - Amplify Gait to Improve Locomotor Engagement in Spinal Cord Injury (AGILE SCI) trial: study protocol for an assessor blinded randomized controlled trial.
Gordon KE, Dusane S, Kahn JH, Shafer A, Brazg G, Henderson H, Kim KA. Gordon KE, et al. BMC Neurol. 2024 Aug 3;24(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03757-2. BMC Neurol. 2024. PMID: 39097695 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Impact of physical activity on surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease in the haemodialysis population.
Hull KL, Abell L, Adenwalla SF, Billany RE, Burns S, Burton JO, Churchward D, Graham-Brown MPM, Gray LJ, Highton P, Lightfoot CJ, Said R, Smith AC, Young HML, March DS. Hull KL, et al. Clin Kidney J. 2024 Jun 28;17(7):sfae198. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae198. eCollection 2024 Jul. Clin Kidney J. 2024. PMID: 39050864 Free PMC article.
References
- Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Sep;32(9 Suppl):S442-9 - PubMed
- Science. 2003 Feb 7;299(5608):853-5 - PubMed
- Patient Educ Couns. 2002 May;47(1):23-8 - PubMed
- Am J Public Health. 1999 Jun;89(6):862-7 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2000 May 6;320(7244):1240-3 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources