How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study - PubMed (original) (raw)

How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study

Sue Ziebland et al. BMJ. 2004.

Abstract

Objective: To explore how men and women with cancer talk about using the internet.

Design: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews collected by maximum variation sampling.

Setting: Respondents recruited throughout the United Kingdom during 2001-2.

Participants: 175 men and women aged 19-83 years, with one of five cancers (prostate, testicular, breast, cervical, or bowel) diagnosed since 1992 and selected to include different stages of treatment and follow up.

Results: Internet use, either directly or via friend or family, was widespread and reported by patients at all stages of cancer care, from early investigations to follow up after treatment. Patients used the internet to find second opinions, seek support and experiential information from other patients, interpret symptoms, seek information about tests and treatments, help interpret consultations, identify questions for doctors, make anonymous private inquiries, and raise awareness of the cancer. Patients also used it to check their doctors' advice covertly and to develop an expertise in their cancer. This expertise, reflecting familiarity with computer technology and medical terms, enabled patients to present a new type of "social fitness."

Conclusion: Cancer patients used the internet for a wide range of information and support needs, many of which are unlikely to be met through conventional health care. Serious illness often undermines people's self image as a competent member of society. Cancer patients may use the internet to acquire expertise to display competence in the face of serious illness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eaton L. Europeans and Americans turn to internet for health information. BMJ 2002;325: 989.
    1. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Eunryoung S. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA 2002;287: 2691-700. - PubMed
    1. Eng TR, Maxfield A, Patrick K, Deering MJ, Ratzan SC, Gustafson DH. Access to health information and support: a public highway or a private road? JAMA 1998;280: 1371-5. - PubMed
    1. Coiera E. The internet's challenge to health care provision. BMJ 1996;312: 3-4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grol R. Foreword. In: Edwards A, Elwyn G, eds. Evidence based patient choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources