Teicoplanin in patients with acute leukaemia and febrile neutropenia: a special population benefiting from higher dosages - PubMed (original) (raw)
Clinical Trial
Teicoplanin in patients with acute leukaemia and febrile neutropenia: a special population benefiting from higher dosages
Federico Pea et al. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004.
Abstract
Objective: To define the optimal dosage regimen of teicoplanin that ensures early therapeutically relevant trough concentrations (C(min)) [>10 mg/L at 24 hours and possibly close to 20 mg/L at 48 hours] in patients with acute leukaemia who develop febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy.
Design: Prospective observational pharmacokinetic study.
Participants: Adult patients (n = 33) with normal renal function previously treated with antineoplastic chemotherapy because of acute lymphocytic or acute nonlymphocytic leukaemia, and subsequently developing febrile neutropenia treated with empirical antimicrobial therapy.
Design: First, the standard dosage group (n = 11) was administered standard loading and maintenance doses of teicoplanin (400 mg every 12 hours for three doses followed by 400 mg once daily). Blood samples were collected at defined times as part of routine monitoring and assessed for teicoplanin plasma concentration by fluorescence polarisation immunoassay. Secondly, the high dosage group (n = 22) received a high loading regimen (800 + 400 mg 12 hours apart on day 1, 600 + 400mg 12 hours apart on day 2) followed by a high maintenance regimen (400 mg every 12 hours) from day 3 on.
Results: In the standard dosage group, no patient had the recommended teicoplanin C(min) of >or=10 mg/L within the first 72 hours, and only five of the 11 patients (45%) had a C(min) of >or=10 mg/L after 120 hours. No patient had a C(min) of >or=20 mg/L. In the high dosage group, teicoplanin C(min) averaged >or=10 mg/L within 24 hours, and this value was achieved within 48 hours in all but one patient. Of note, C(min) at 72 hours exceeded 20 mg/L in ten of the 22 patients (45%). No patient experienced significant impairment of renal function.
Conclusions: In this patient group, therapeutically relevant C(min) may be achieved very early in the treatment period with loading doses of 12 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg 12 hours apart on day 1, and 9 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg 12 hours apart on day 2, regardless of renal function. Subsequently, in patients with normal renal function a maintenance dosage of 6 mg/kg every 12 hours may be helpful in ensuring C(min) close to 20 mg/L. Assessment of C(min) after 48-72 hours may be useful to individualise teicoplanin therapy. Factors increasing volume of distribution and/or renal clearance of teicoplanin (fluid load, hypoalbuminaemia, leukaemic status) may explain the need for higher dosages.
Similar articles
- Loading dose required to achieve rapid therapeutic teicoplanin trough plasma concentration in patients with multidrug-resistant gram-positive infections.
Wang JT, Liao HI, Wu Lin FL, Chang SC. Wang JT, et al. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012 May;110(5):416-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2012.00862.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012. PMID: 22309355 Clinical Trial. - Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.
Wilson AP. Wilson AP. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000 Sep;39(3):167-83. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200039030-00001. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000. PMID: 11020133 Review. - Recommendations to achieve rapid therapeutic teicoplanin plasma concentrations in adult hospitalised patients treated for sepsis.
Brink AJ, Richards GA, Cummins RR, Lambson J; Gauteng Understanding Teicoplanin Serum levels (GUTS) study group. Brink AJ, et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008 Nov;32(5):455-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.05.012. Epub 2008 Aug 20. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008. PMID: 18718742 Clinical Trial. - Simplified dosing regimens of teicoplanin for patient groups stratified by renal function and weight using Monte Carlo simulation.
Yamada T, Nonaka T, Yano T, Kubota T, Egashira N, Kawashiri T, Oishi R. Yamada T, et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012 Oct;40(4):344-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.05.025. Epub 2012 Jul 19. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012. PMID: 22818770 - Teicoplanin versus vancomycin in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.
Chow AW, Jewesson PJ, Kureishi A, Phillips GL. Chow AW, et al. Eur J Haematol Suppl. 1993;54:18-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1993.tb01901.x. Eur J Haematol Suppl. 1993. PMID: 8365461 Review.
Cited by
- Proposal of a pharmacokinetically optimized dosage regimen of antibiotics in patients receiving continuous hemodiafiltration.
Yamamoto T, Yasuno N, Katada S, Hisaka A, Hanafusa N, Noiri E, Yahagi N, Fujita T, Suzuki H. Yamamoto T, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Dec;55(12):5804-12. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01758-10. Epub 2011 Sep 12. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011. PMID: 21911561 Free PMC article. - Antimicrobial treatment of febrile neutropenia: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations.
Goulenok T, Fantin B. Goulenok T, et al. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013 Oct;52(10):869-83. doi: 10.1007/s40262-013-0086-1. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013. PMID: 23807657 Review. - Augmented renal clearance in pediatric intensive care: are we undertreating our sickest patients?
Dhont E, Van Der Heggen T, De Jaeger A, Vande Walle J, De Paepe P, De Cock PA. Dhont E, et al. Pediatr Nephrol. 2020 Jan;35(1):25-39. doi: 10.1007/s00467-018-4120-2. Epub 2018 Oct 29. Pediatr Nephrol. 2020. PMID: 30374606 Review. - Teicoplanin dosing strategy for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus in Korean patients with neutropenic fever.
Ahn BJ, Yim DS, Lee DG, Kwon JC, Kim SH, Choi SM. Ahn BJ, et al. Yonsei Med J. 2011 Jul;52(4):616-23. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.4.616. Yonsei Med J. 2011. PMID: 21623604 Free PMC article. - Loading regimen required to rapidly achieve therapeutic trough plasma concentration of teicoplanin and evaluation of clinical features.
Seki M, Yabuno K, Miyawaki K, Miwa Y, Tomono K. Seki M, et al. Clin Pharmacol. 2012;4:71-5. doi: 10.2147/CPAA.S37528. Epub 2012 Nov 27. Clin Pharmacol. 2012. PMID: 23236257 Free PMC article.
References
- Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Aug;33(8):1406-8 - PubMed
- Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 May;40(5):1242-7 - PubMed
- J Chemother. 2000 Nov;12 Suppl 5:26-33 - PubMed
- Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Sep;37(9):1924-6 - PubMed
- Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998 Oct;22(8):795-800 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical