Inhibition of acute graft-versus-host disease with retention of graft-versus-tumor effects by the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib - PubMed (original) (raw)

. 2004 May 25;101(21):8120-5.

doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401563101. Epub 2004 May 17.

Lisbeth A Welniak, Angela Panoskaltsis-Mortari, Matthew J O'Shaughnessy, Haiyan Liu, Isabel Barao, William Riordan, Raquel Sitcheran, Christian Wysocki, Jonathan S Serody, Bruce R Blazar, Thomas J Sayers, William J Murphy

Affiliations

Inhibition of acute graft-versus-host disease with retention of graft-versus-tumor effects by the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib

Kai Sun et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004.

Erratum in

Abstract

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) represents a major hurdle impeding the efficacy of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that was recently approved for treatment of myeloma. We found that bortezomib potently inhibited in vitro mixed lymphocyte responses and promoted the apoptosis of alloreactive T cells. Bortezomib given at the time of allogeneic BMT in mice resulted in significant protection from acute GVHD. Reductions in GVHD-associated parameters and biological evidence of proteasome inhibition were observed with this regimen but with no adverse effects on long-term donor reconstitution. Assessment of graft-versus-tumor responses in advanced leukemia-bearing mice demonstrated that only the combination of allogeneic BMT and T cells with bortezomib promoted significant increases in survival. Increased cytotoxic T cell killing of the tumor was also observed. Thus, the combination of proteasome inhibition with selective immune attack can markedly increase the efficacy of BMT in cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Proliferating, and not resting, T cells are highly sensitive to bortezomib-mediated cytotoxicity. Allogeneic T cell responses are inhibited by bortezomib in vitro. (A_–_C) Proliferation and induction of apoptosis of alloreactive T cells in a MLR. (A) Alloreactive T cell proliferation was significantly decreased at days 3 and 5 (P < 0.001) in the presence of 2 nM (▾) and 4 nM (♦) but not 1 nM (▴) bortezomib. (B) Proportionally greater increase in annexin V binding on proliferating (CFSElo) compared with nonalloreactive (CFSEhi) CD4+ T cells with exposure to 4 nM bortezomib. (C) Proportionally greater increase in cell surface expression of annexin V on proliferating (CFSElo) compared with nonalloreactive (CFSEhi) CD8+ T cells with exposure to 2 and 4 nM bortezomib. *, significant differences of annexin V binding on bortezomib-exposed T cells compared with vehicle control (P < 0.05). The combined results of two independent experiments presented in B and C.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Protection of mice from acute lethal GVHD with bortezomib administration. (A) Bortezomib administration delays GVHD mortality in an aggressive model of acute lethal GVHD. B6 (H-2b) recipients of 15 million BALB/c (H-2d) bone marrow and 40 million spleen cells were treated with 10 μg per dose of bortezomib or vehicle control (PBS) daily from day 0 through day +3 post-BMT. Significant increases in survival were observed in bortezomib-treated animals (▾) compared with PBS-treated mice (▪)(P < 0.0001). (B) Bortezomib administration protects mice from GVHD mortality in a moderately aggressive model of acute lethal GVHD. B6 (H-2b) recipients of 15 million BALB/c (H-2d) bone marrow and 25 million spleen cells were treated with 10 μg per dose of bortezomib or vehicle control (PBS) daily from day 0 through +2 post-BMT. Significant increases in survival were observed in bortezomib-treated animals (▾) compared with PBS-treated mice (▾) (P < 0.0001). Results from one of three independent experiments are presented for A and B. Each experiment consists of 8–10 mice per treatment group in GVHD induction arms and 3–4 mice in BMT control arms.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Bortezomib administration reduces donor-derived T cell expansion after BMT. B6 (H-2b) recipients of 15 million BALB/c (H-2d) T cell-depleted bone marrow and 15 million CFSE-labeled purified T cells were treated with bortezomib or vehicle control (PBS) daily on day 0 and day +2 post-BMT. Each treatment group consists of three mice per group. Representative data from one of two independent experiments are presented. (A) Significant reductions (Student's t test; P < 0.05) in donor-derived CD4+ and CD8+ splenocytes were observed on days +3 and +4 post-BMT of bortezomib-treated mice. (B) Significant increases in annexin V binding on proliferating (CFSElo) but not on nonalloreactive (CFSEhi) CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in spleens from bortezomib-treated mice on day +3 post-BMT. (C) B6 (H-2b) recipients of 15 million BALB/c (H-2d) bone marrow and 20 million spleen cells were treated with bortezomib or vehicle control (PBS) daily from day 0 through day +2 post-BMT. Mice were bled on days +7 and +30 after BMT. Serum was analyzed for TNF-α as described in Materials and Methods. Significant reductions (Student's t test; P < 0.05) in serum TNF-α were observed at both time points in bortezomib-treated mice. Representative data from one of two independent experiments are presented.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Proteasome inhibition and nuclear NF-κB activity after treatment with bortezomib in vivo. B6 mice were transplanted with BALB/c bone marrow and 25 million splenocytes as described in Materials and Methods and treated on days 0 and +2 with 20 μg of bortezomib or PBS. Spleens from two to three mice per treatment group were collected on days +3 and +4 for measurement of 20S proteasome inhibition and day +4 for nuclear NF-κB activity analysis. (A) Significant reductions in nuclear NF-κB activity in bortezomib-treated mice were measured by electromobility shift assay. (B) Inhibition of chymotrypic activity in splenic cell homogenates of bortezomib-treated mice was compared with samples from PBS-treated mice.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

GVT activity is preserved with bortezomib administration after BMT. (A_–_C) B6 (H-2b) mice received 2 × 105 syngeneic C1498 cells on day 0. Effects of bortezomib administration on tumor survival were determined in various models. Mice received 15 μg per dose bortezomib or vehicle control (PBS) daily on days +11 and +13 after tumor injection. Results from one of three independent experiments are presented. Each experiment consists of 8–11 mice per treatment group. (A) No difference in survival was observed in nontransplanted mice. (B) Some groups were irradiated on day +10 after tumor cell injection, followed by injection of 15 million BALB/c (H-2d) bone marrow cells on day +11. Allogeneic BMT provided significant protection in tumor survival (P < 0.005) that was not changed by bortezomib administration. (C) In the same representative experiment as B, some groups additionally received 35 million BALB/c spleen cells. Mice that received vehicle control (PBS) injections succumbed to GVHD-associated morbidity. Mice that received bortezomib (▴) survived significantly longer than either untreated tumor-bearing mice (•; P < 0.0001) or mice that received a BMT with spleen cell and vehicle control treatment (▪; P < 0.0001).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Bortezomib enhances CTL killing of allogeneic tumor cells. BALB/c (H2d) mice were primed with irradiated C1498 cells (H2b) as described in Materials and Methods. Spleen cells were then harvested and restimulated with irradiated C1498 cells in vitro at a ratio of 20:1 for 5 days. CTL were collected and cultured with C1498 (H2b) in the presence or absence of 4 nM bortezomib. Tumor cells were analyzed by flow cytometry and clonogeneic growth. (A and B) C1498 cells were gated on based on H2b expression and forward- and side-scatter properties; the gated cells were analyzed for annexin V binding and propidium iodide incorporation at the end of 36-h incubation. (A) Representative dot plots. (B) Decreased numbers of live C1498 tumor cells (annexin V and propidium iodide negative). (C) Clonogeneic C1498 growth was determined after treatment with CTL in the presence or absence of bortezomib for 45 h. Representative data from one of two independent experiments are presented.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ferrara, J. L., Deeg, H. & Burakoff, S. J. (1997) Graft-versus-Host Disease (Marcel Decker, New York).
    1. Graubert, T. A., Russell, J. H. & Ley, T. J. (1996) Blood 87, 1232–1237. - PubMed
    1. Murphy, G. F., Whitaker, D., Sprent, J. & Korngold, R. (1991) Am. J. Pathol. 138, 983–990. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nestel, F. P., Greene, R. N., Kichian, K., Ponka, P. & Lapp, W. S. (2000) Blood 96, 1836–1843. - PubMed
    1. Welniak, L. A., Blazar, B. R., Wiltrout, R. H., Anver, M. R. & Murphy, W. J. (2001) Transplant. Proc. 33, 1752–1753. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources