CMV antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell IFNgamma expression and proliferation responses in healthy CMV-seropositive individuals - PubMed (original) (raw)
CMV antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell IFNgamma expression and proliferation responses in healthy CMV-seropositive individuals
Elizabeth Sinclair et al. Viral Immunol. 2004.
Abstract
CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell IFNgamma expression and proliferation were measured in healthy volunteers by flow cytometry after CMV lysate or CMV pp65 or IE peptide pool stimulation. Cutoff values were set to maximize specificity (i.e., no false positive CMV-seronegatives). Sensitivity (defined as a positive response in CMV-seropositives to at least one of the 3 antigen preparations used) was 100% for CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell IFN expression and CD4+ T cell proliferation and 95.4% for CMV-specific CD8+ T cell proliferation. All 22 CMV-seropositive individuals had positive responses by at least three of these four measurements. These findings support the concept that a multiplicity of antigen-specific functional immune responses and persistence of robust virus-specific CD4+T cells are important components of protective immunity in this chronic viral infection.
Figures
FIG. 1
Flow cytometric measurement of antigen-specific proliferation. In the gating strategy to quantify the percentage of proliferating T cells (A), monocytes are excluded (upper left) before a lymphocyte/blast gate is drawn (upper right), and then CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD4− gates are drawn (lower left). Proliferating cells are CFSElo with high forward scatter (lower right). (B) Typical antigen-specific proliferation patterns in a CMV-seropositive donor are shown. CD4+ T cell responses are shown on the right and CD8 (CD3+ CD4−) are shown on the right in response to stimulation with pp65 peptide pool (i), IE peptide pool (ii), CMV lysate (iii), and unstimulated (iv).
FIG. 2
CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses of CMV-seropositive and CMV-seronegative donors to stimulation with CMV lysate (i), pp65 peptide pool (ii), and IE peptide pool (iii). CD4+ and CD8+ T cell proliferation (A) was significantly higher in the CMV-seropositive donors, compared with the CMV-seronegatives for all three antigens (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons except CD8+ IE response, p = 0.0005). Likewise CD4+ and CD8+ T cell IFNγ expression, measured in the CFC assay (B), was significantly higher in the CMV-seropositives (p < 0.0001). IFNγ expression and proliferation were quantified as a percentage of the total CD4+ (gated on CD3+CD4+) or CD8+ (gated on CD3+CD4−) T cell population.
Similar articles
- Antigen-specific T cell responses induced by Towne cytomegalovirus (CMV) vaccine in CMV-seronegative vaccine recipients.
Jacobson MA, Sinclair E, Bredt B, Agrillo L, Black D, Epling CL, Carvidi A, Ho T, Bains R, Adler SP. Jacobson MA, et al. J Clin Virol. 2006 Mar;35(3):332-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2005.09.019. Epub 2006 Jan 18. J Clin Virol. 2006. PMID: 16387547 - Kinetics of cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 and IE-1-specific IFNgamma CD8+ and CD4+ T cells during episodes of viral DNAemia in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients: potential implications for the management of active CMV infection.
Tormo N, Solano C, Benet I, Nieto J, de la Cámara R, Garcia-Noblejas A, Clari MA, Chilet M, López J, Hernández-Boluda JC, Remigia MJ, Navarro D. Tormo N, et al. J Med Virol. 2010 Jul;82(7):1208-15. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21799. J Med Virol. 2010. PMID: 20513086 - [Monitoring of cytomegalovirus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses by cytokine flow cytometry in renal transplant recipients].
Kılınçkaya Doğan H, Mutlu E, Köksoy S, Yılmaz VT, Koçak H, Çolak D, Mutlu D, Günseren F, Dinçkan A, Aliosmanoğlu İ, Süleymanlar G, Gültekin M. Kılınçkaya Doğan H, et al. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2016 Apr;50(2):224-35. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2016. PMID: 27175495 Turkish. - Analyzing T-cell responses to cytomegalovirus by cytokine flow cytometry.
Maecker HT, Maino VC. Maecker HT, et al. Hum Immunol. 2004 May;65(5):493-9. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2004.02.004. Hum Immunol. 2004. PMID: 15172449 Review. - Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific cellular immune responses.
Harari A, Zimmerli SC, Pantaleo G. Harari A, et al. Hum Immunol. 2004 May;65(5):500-6. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2004.02.012. Hum Immunol. 2004. PMID: 15172450 Review.
Cited by
- Humoral and cellular CMV responses in healthy donors; identification of a frequent population of CMV-specific, CD4+ T cells in seronegative donors.
Loeth N, Assing K, Madsen HO, Vindeløv L, Buus S, Stryhn A. Loeth N, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031420. Epub 2012 Feb 7. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22347475 Free PMC article. - Assessing Anti-HCMV Cell Mediated Immune Responses in Transplant Recipients and Healthy Controls Using a Novel Functional Assay.
Houldcroft CJ, Jackson SE, Lim EY, Sedikides GX, Davies EL, Atkinson C, McIntosh M, Remmerswaal EBM, Okecha G, Bemelman FJ, Stanton RJ, Reeves M, Wills MR. Houldcroft CJ, et al. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Jun 26;10:275. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00275. eCollection 2020. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 32670891 Free PMC article. - A fusion protein of HCMV IE1 exon4 and IE2 exon5 stimulates potent cellular immunity in an MVA vaccine vector.
Wang Z, Zhou W, Srivastava T, La Rosa C, Mandarino A, Forman SJ, Zaia JA, Britt WJ, Diamond DJ. Wang Z, et al. Virology. 2008 Aug 1;377(2):379-90. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.04.034. Epub 2008 Jun 5. Virology. 2008. PMID: 18538366 Free PMC article. - Kinetics of immune cell reconstitution predict survival in allogeneic bone marrow and G-CSF-mobilized stem cell transplantation.
Waller EK, Logan BR, Fei M, Lee SJ, Confer D, Howard A, Chandrakasan S, Anasetti C, Fernando SM, Giver CR. Waller EK, et al. Blood Adv. 2019 Aug 13;3(15):2250-2263. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018029892. Blood Adv. 2019. PMID: 31345792 Free PMC article. - Extracellular Lactate: A Novel Measure of T Cell Proliferation.
Grist JT, Jarvis LB, Georgieva Z, Thompson S, Kaur Sandhu H, Burling K, Clarke A, Jackson S, Wills M, Gallagher FA, Jones JL. Grist JT, et al. J Immunol. 2018 Feb 1;200(3):1220-1226. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700886. Epub 2017 Dec 29. J Immunol. 2018. PMID: 29288205 Free PMC article.
References
- Crumpacker, C.S. Cytomegalovirus, pp. 1586–1599. In: Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 5th ed. G.L. Mandell, J.E. Bennett, and R. Dolin (eds.), Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia.
- Dunn HS, Haney DJ, et al. Dynamics of CD4 and CD8 T cell responses to cytomegalovirus in healthy human donors. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:15–22. - PubMed
- Larsson S, Soderberg-Naucler C, Wang FZ, et al. Cytomegalovirus DNA can be detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from all seropositive and most seronegative healthy blood donors over time. Transfusion. 1998;38:271– 278. - PubMed
- Adler SP, Starr SE, et al. Immunity induced by primary human cytomegalovirus infection protects against secondary infection among women of childbearing age. J Infect Dis. 1995;171:26–32. - PubMed
- Komanduri KV, Viswanathan MN, Weider ED, et al. Restoration of cytomegalovirus-specific CD4+ T-lymphocyte responses after ganciclovir and highly active antiretroviral therapy in individuals infected with HIV-1. Nat Med. 1998;4:953–956. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- R01 AI049538-01A1/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AI049538/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AI049538-03/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- R01AI47062/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- R0-1 AI49538/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- M01 RR00083/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- P30 AI027763/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- M01 RR000083/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AI047062/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- P30 AI27763/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AI049538-02/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials