Patient initiated outpatient follow up in rheumatoid arthritis: six year randomised controlled trial - PubMed (original) (raw)

Clinical Trial

Patient initiated outpatient follow up in rheumatoid arthritis: six year randomised controlled trial

Sarah Hewlett et al. BMJ. 2005.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether direct access to hospital review initiated by patients with rheumatoid arthritis would result in improved clinical and psychological outcome, reduced overall use of healthcare resources, and greater satisfaction with care than seen in patients receiving regular review initiated by a rheumatologist.

Design: Two year randomised controlled trial extended to six years.

Setting: Rheumatology outpatient department in teaching hospital.

Participants: 209 consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis for over two years; 68 (65%) in the direct access group and 52 (50%) in the control group completed the study (P = 0.04).

Clinical outcome: pain, disease activity, early morning stiffness, inflammatory indices, disability, grip strength, range of movement in joints, and bone erosion. Psychological status: anxiety, depression, helplessness, self efficacy, satisfaction, and confidence in the system. Number of visits to hospital physician and general practitioner for arthritis.

Results: Participants were well matched at baseline. After six years there was only one significant difference between the two groups for the 14 clinical outcomes measured (deterioration in range of movement in elbow was less in direct access patients). There were no significant differences between groups for median change in psychological status. Satisfaction and confidence in the system were significantly higher in the direct access group at two, four, and six years: confidence 9.8 v 8.4, 9.4 v 8.0, 8.7 v 6.9; satisfaction 9.3 v 8.3, 9.3 v 7.7, 8.9 v 7.1 (all P < 0.02). Patients in the direct access group had 38% fewer hospital appointments (median 8 v 13, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Over six years, patients with rheumatoid arthritis who initiated their reviews through direct access were clinically and psychologically at least as well as patients having traditional reviews initiated by a physician. They requested fewer appointments, found direct access more acceptable, and had more than a third fewer medical appointments. This radical responsive management could be tested in other chronic diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1

Fig 1

Study flowchart

Fig 2

Fig 2

Patients' confidence and satisfaction in the system

Fig 3

Fig 3

Hospital rheumatologist appointments over six years

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hehir M, Hewlett S, Mitchell K, Kirwan J, Memel D, Pollock J, et al. What happens in RA outpatient clinics? Rheumatology 2001;40: S146.
    1. Dickson DJ. What do general practitioners expect from rheumatology clinics? Br J Rheumatol 1996;35: 920. - PubMed
    1. Reeve H, Baxter K, Newton P, Burkey Y, Black M, Roland M. Long-term follow-up in outpatient clinics. 1: The view from general practice. Fam Pract 1997;14: 24-8. - PubMed
    1. Schulpen GJC, Vierhout SPM, Van Der Heijde DM, Landewe RB, Winkens RAG, Winkens AMK, et al. Patients at the outpatient rheumatology clinic: do they really need to be there? Eur J Intern Med 2003;14: 158-61. - PubMed
    1. Damme R van, Drummond N, Beattie J, Douglas G. Integrated care of patients with asthma: views of general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract 1994;44: 9-13. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources