Critical appraisal of neuroprotection trials in head injury: what have we learned? - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Critical appraisal of neuroprotection trials in head injury: what have we learned?

Christos M Tolias et al. NeuroRx. 2004 Jan.

Abstract

To date, despite very encouraging preclinical results, almost all phase II/III clinical neuroprotection trials in traumatic brain injury (TBI) have failed to show any consistent improvement in outcome for TBI patients. To understand the reasons behind such developments we need to review and evaluate the evolution of trial design as a result of our changing understanding of the pathophysiology of brain cell death and progress of translational research from the laboratory bench to the bedside. This paper attempts to critically appraise these neuroprotection trials, rationalize the paucity of effectiveness, review any recent developments in the field, and try to draw some conclusions on how to move forward.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kay A, Teasdale GM. Head injury in the United Kingdom. World J Surg 25: 1210–1220, 2001. - PubMed
    1. Narayan RK, Michael ME, The Clinical Trials in Head Injury Study Group. Clinical trials in head injury. J Neurotrauma 19: 503–557, 2002. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability and the contribution of the risk factors: global burden of disease study. Lancet 349: 1436–1442, 1997. - PubMed
    1. Bullock R, Lyeth BG, Muizelaar JP. Current status of neuroprotection trials for traumatic brain injury: lessons from animal models and clinical studies. Neurosurgery 45: 207–220, 1999. - PubMed
    1. Choi DW, Maulucci-Gedde M, Kriegstein AR. Glutamate neurotoxicity in cortical cell culture. J Neurosci 7: 357–368, 1987. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources