Effects of mGlu1 receptor blockade on anxiety-related behaviour in the rat lick suppression test - PubMed (original) (raw)

. 2005 Apr;179(1):198-206.

doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-2056-7. Epub 2004 Dec 4.

Affiliations

Thomas Steckler et al. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Apr.

Abstract

Rationale: Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists, which block both the mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptors, have been shown to have anxiolytic effects in the lick suppression test in rats.

Objective: The anxiolytic potential of the selective mGlu1 antagonist 3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3]beta-quinolin-7-yl)(cis-4-methoxycyclohexyl)methanone (JNJ16259685) was investigated and compared with the mGlu5 antagonist MPEP.

Methods: Anxiety-related behaviour was assessed in lick suppression and in the elevated zero maze in rats. Non-specific effects on pain threshold, water intake and locomotor activity were also measured.

Results: Acute administration of JNJ16259685 or MPEP increased the number of licks (lowest active dose 2.5 mg/kg IP for each compound). JNJ16259685 did not increase water intake or reduce acute pain threshold, suggesting that the anxiolytic-like properties are specific. However, acute administration decreased locomotor activity. The effects of chronic administration of JNJ16259685 over 14 days (5 mg/kg bid) on lick suppression were comparable to those seen after acute administration, arguing against development of behavioural tolerance or sensitisation. Yet, there was a tendency for an increase in locomotor activity after cessation of chronic treatment. Acute co-administration of both JNJ16259685 and MPEP had additive effects on the number of licks. No anxiolytic-like properties of JNJ16259685 were observed in the elevated zero maze.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that the anxiolytic-like effects induced by group I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists are mediated through both mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptors. Rather than producing a general anxiolytic-like effect, the effects seen following mGlu1 antagonism seem task-dependent, as prominent effects were seen in a conflict procedure, but not in a task based on spontaneous exploration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neuropharmacology. 2002 Aug;43(2):119-30 - PubMed
    1. Mol Pharmacol. 2002 May;61(5):1244-54 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002 Jan;300(1):149-56 - PubMed
    1. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001 Jul;22(7):331-7 - PubMed
    1. Neuropharmacology. 1999 Oct;38(10 ):1493-503 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources