Benefits and obstacles of health status assessment in ambulatory settings. The clinician's point of view. The Dartmouth Primary Care COOP Project - PubMed (original) (raw)
Benefits and obstacles of health status assessment in ambulatory settings. The clinician's point of view. The Dartmouth Primary Care COOP Project
J Wasson et al. Med Care. 1992 May.
Abstract
In the past decade physicians have identified the need to expand patient assessment to include global function and quality of life. During the same period, the busy clinic has evolved into the location where this assessment seems most appropriate. Integrating functional health assessment into a busy clinical practice is difficult because the necessary steps require time, thought, recording, and follow-up. Attention to the office ecosystem is very important before any patient care management method is introduced. The clinician must transform the results of health status screening into a specific functional diagnosis. The clinician has to understand the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the measure for a preliminary diagnosis to be made. Often, additional measurements must be taken to establish a specific diagnosis. These steps encompass assessment linkage. Once the specific cause for the dysfunction is recognized, the clinician then has to determine the need for special resources. This is called the resource linkage. By following the steps outlined in this paper, the clinician should be able to overcome many obstacles for functional health status assessment in busy ambulatory settings.
Similar articles
- Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings.
Greenfield S, Nelson EC. Greenfield S, et al. Med Care. 1992 May;30(5 Suppl):MS23-41. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00003. Med Care. 1992. PMID: 1583935 Review. - Strategies for improving and expanding the application of health status measures in clinical settings. A researcher-developer viewpoint.
Deyo RA, Carter WB. Deyo RA, et al. Med Care. 1992 May;30(5 Suppl):MS176-86; discussion MS196-209. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00015. Med Care. 1992. PMID: 1583932 Review. - Benefits and obstacles for development of health status assessment measures in clinical settings.
Feinstein AR. Feinstein AR. Med Care. 1992 May;30(5 Suppl):MS50-6. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00005. Med Care. 1992. PMID: 1583941 - The functional status of patients. How can it be measured in physicians' offices?
Nelson EC, Landgraf JM, Hays RD, Wasson JH, Kirk JW. Nelson EC, et al. Med Care. 1990 Dec;28(12):1111-26. Med Care. 1990. PMID: 2250496
Cited by
- Do the pictures influence scores on the Dartmouth COOP Charts?
Larson CO, Hays RD, Nelson EC. Larson CO, et al. Qual Life Res. 1992 Aug;1(4):247-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00435633. Qual Life Res. 1992. PMID: 1299455 Clinical Trial. - Development of the Short Form Endometriosis Health Profile Questionnaire: the EHP-5.
Jones G, Jenkinson C, Kennedy S. Jones G, et al. Qual Life Res. 2004 Apr;13(3):695-704. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000021321.48041.0e. Qual Life Res. 2004. PMID: 15130031 - Mobility difficulties are not only a problem of old age.
Iezzoni LI, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Siebens H. Iezzoni LI, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Apr;16(4):235-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016004235.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2001. PMID: 11318924 Free PMC article. - An overview of generic health-related quality of life measures for HIV research.
Hays RD, Shapiro MF. Hays RD, et al. Qual Life Res. 1992 Apr;1(2):91-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00439716. Qual Life Res. 1992. PMID: 1301123 - Validation of the care notebook for measuring physical, mental and life well-being of patients with cancer.
Kobayashi K, Green J, Shimonagayoshi M, Kanemoto N, Kasai R, Itoh Y, Fujiki Y, Ohashi Y, Gotay C, Kudoh S. Kobayashi K, et al. Qual Life Res. 2005 May;14(4):1035-43. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-2958-1. Qual Life Res. 2005. PMID: 16041899
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous