A synbiotic combination of resistant starch and Bifidobacterium lactis facilitates apoptotic deletion of carcinogen-damaged cells in rat colon - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2005 May;135(5):996-1001.
doi: 10.1093/jn/135.5.996.
Affiliations
- PMID: 15867271
- DOI: 10.1093/jn/135.5.996
Free article
A synbiotic combination of resistant starch and Bifidobacterium lactis facilitates apoptotic deletion of carcinogen-damaged cells in rat colon
Richard K Le Leu et al. J Nutr. 2005 May.
Free article
Abstract
Recent reports suggest that combinations of prebiotics and probiotics may be protective against colorectal cancer. We examined in rats the effects of probiotic bacteria, resistant starch (RS), and their interaction on luminal and epithelial events of relevance to the development of colorectal cancer. Lyophilized cultures (1 x 10(10) cfu/g) of Lactobacillus acidophilus and/or Bifidobacterium lactis were added at a concentration of 1% by weight to a semipurified diet containing either low-RS (no supplemented RS) or moderate-RS (10% Hi-maize) and fed to male Sprague-Dawley rats for 4 wk. Experimental end-points included cecal bacterial enumeration, fecal and cecal pH, SCFA levels, cell proliferation, and the acute apoptotic response to a genotoxic carcinogen (AARGC; measured 6 h after a single azoxymethane injection). A significant interaction between dietary RS and supplemental bacteria was observed for the AARGC in the colon and fecal pH (P < 0.01). Rats fed the moderate-RS diet in combination with B. lactis had a significantly greater AARGC in the colon than those fed that diet without B. lactis. Fecal pH was elevated in the moderate-RS fed rats supplemented with bacteria. The moderate-RS diet increased cell proliferation and crypt column height (P < 0.001) compared with the low-RS diet. SCFA levels and numbers of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli species were also increased (P < 0.001) by the moderate-RS diet, whereas pH levels and total coliforms were lowered (P < 0.001). The synbiotic combination of RS and B. lactis significantly facilitated the apoptotic response to a genotoxic carcinogen in the distal colon of rats. It appears likely that ingested RS acts as a metabolic substrate, thus creating the right conditions for B. lactis to exert its proapoptotic action. Because the synbiotic combination of these agents facilitates the apoptotic response to DNA damage by a cancer initiator in the colon of rats, it warrants further study for its capacity to protect against colorectal cancer.
Similar articles
- Synbiotic intervention of Bifidobacterium lactis and resistant starch protects against colorectal cancer development in rats.
Le Leu RK, Hu Y, Brown IL, Woodman RJ, Young GP. Le Leu RK, et al. Carcinogenesis. 2010 Feb;31(2):246-51. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp197. Epub 2009 Aug 20. Carcinogenesis. 2010. PMID: 19696163 - Effect of resistant starch on genotoxin-induced apoptosis, colonic epithelium, and lumenal contents in rats.
Le Leu RK, Brown IL, Hu Y, Young GP. Le Leu RK, et al. Carcinogenesis. 2003 Aug;24(8):1347-52. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgg098. Epub 2003 Jun 5. Carcinogenesis. 2003. PMID: 12807738 - Antitumorigenic activity of the prebiotic inulin enriched with oligofructose in combination with the probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium lactis on azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis in rats.
Femia AP, Luceri C, Dolara P, Giannini A, Biggeri A, Salvadori M, Clune Y, Collins KJ, Paglierani M, Caderni G. Femia AP, et al. Carcinogenesis. 2002 Nov;23(11):1953-60. doi: 10.1093/carcin/23.11.1953. Carcinogenesis. 2002. PMID: 12419846 - Possible mechanisms by which pro- and prebiotics influence colon carcinogenesis and tumor growth.
Reddy BS. Reddy BS. J Nutr. 1999 Jul;129(7 Suppl):1478S-82S. doi: 10.1093/jn/129.7.1478S. J Nutr. 1999. PMID: 10395625 Review. - Protective role of probiotics and prebiotics in colon cancer.
Wollowski I, Rechkemmer G, Pool-Zobel BL. Wollowski I, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Feb;73(2 Suppl):451S-455S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.451s. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001. PMID: 11157356 Review.
Cited by
- Metabolomic applications to decipher gut microbial metabolic influence in health and disease.
Martin FP, Collino S, Rezzi S, Kochhar S. Martin FP, et al. Front Physiol. 2012 Apr 26;3:113. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00113. eCollection 2012. Front Physiol. 2012. PMID: 22557976 Free PMC article. - The impact of Lactobacillus acidophilus on hepatic and colonic fibrosis induced by ethephon in a rat model.
Bahr HI, Hamad R, Ismail SA. Bahr HI, et al. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2019 Aug;22(8):956-962. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2019.32936.7866. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 31579453 Free PMC article. - Potential of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics for management of colorectal cancer.
Raman M, Ambalam P, Kondepudi KK, Pithva S, Kothari C, Patel AT, Purama RK, Dave JM, Vyas BR. Raman M, et al. Gut Microbes. 2013 May-Jun;4(3):181-92. doi: 10.4161/gmic.23919. Epub 2013 Mar 19. Gut Microbes. 2013. PMID: 23511582 Free PMC article. Review. - Potential role of probiotics on colorectal cancer prevention.
Uccello M, Malaguarnera G, Basile F, D'agata V, Malaguarnera M, Bertino G, Vacante M, Drago F, Biondi A. Uccello M, et al. BMC Surg. 2012;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-12-S1-S35. Epub 2012 Nov 15. BMC Surg. 2012. PMID: 23173670 Free PMC article. Review. - Human gut commensal bacterium Ruminococcus species FMB-CY1 completely degrades the granules of resistant starch.
Hong YS, Jung DH, Chung WH, Nam YD, Kim YJ, Seo DH, Park CS. Hong YS, et al. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2022 Jan 10;31(2):231-241. doi: 10.1007/s10068-021-01027-2. eCollection 2022 Feb. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 35186353 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources