Mechanical response analysis and power generation by single-cell stretching - PubMed (original) (raw)
Mechanical response analysis and power generation by single-cell stretching
Alexandre Micoulet et al. Chemphyschem. 2005 Apr.
Abstract
To harvest useful information about cell response due to mechanical perturbations under physiological conditions, a cantilever-based technique was designed, which allowed precise application of arbitrary forces or deformation histories on a single cell in vitro. Essential requirements for these investigations are a mechanism for applying an automated cell force and an induced-deformation detection system based on fiber-optical force sensing and closed loop control. The required mechanical stability of the setup can persist for several hours since mechanical drifts due to thermal gradients can be eliminated sufficiently (these gradients are caused by local heating of the cell observation chamber to 37 degrees C). During mechanical characterization, the cell is visualized with an optical microscope, which enables the simultaneous observation of cell shape and intracellular morphological changes. Either the cell elongation is observed as a reaction against a constant load or the cell force is measured as a response to constant deformation. Passive viscoelastic deformation and active cell response can be discriminated. The active power generated during contraction is in the range of Pmax= 10(-16) Watts, which corresponds to 2500 ATP molecules s(-1) at 10 k(B)T/molecule. The ratio of contractive to dissipative power is estimated to be in the range of 10(-2). The highest forces supported by the cell suggest that about 10(4) molecular motors must be involved in contraction. This indicates an energy-conversion efficiency of approximately 0.5. Our findings propose that, in addition to the recruitment of cell-contractile elements upon mechanical stimulation, the cell cytoskeleton becomes increasingly crosslinked in response to a mechanical pull. Quantitative stress-strain data, such as those presented here, may be employed to test physical models that describe cellular responses to mechanical stimuli.
Similar articles
- Viscoelastic properties of single poly(ethylene glycol) molecules.
Kawakami M, Byrne K, Khatri BS, McLeish TC, Smith DA. Kawakami M, et al. Chemphyschem. 2006 Aug 11;7(8):1710-6. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200600116. Chemphyschem. 2006. PMID: 16865759 - Measurement of local strain on cell membrane at initiation point of calcium signaling response to applied mechanical stimulus in osteoblastic cells.
Sato K, Adachi T, Ueda D, Hojo M, Tomita Y. Sato K, et al. J Biomech. 2007;40(6):1246-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.05.028. Epub 2006 Aug 2. J Biomech. 2007. PMID: 16887125 - Cellular stiffness response to external deformation: tensional homeostasis in a single fibroblast.
Mizutani T, Haga H, Kawabata K. Mizutani T, et al. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2004 Dec;59(4):242-8. doi: 10.1002/cm.20037. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2004. PMID: 15493061 - The sarcomeric control of energy conversion.
Levy C, Ter Keurs HE, Yaniv Y, Landesberg A. Levy C, et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Jun;1047:219-31. doi: 10.1196/annals.1341.020. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005. PMID: 16093499 Review. - Strategies and results of atomic force microscopy in the study of cellular adhesion.
Simon A, Durrieu MC. Simon A, et al. Micron. 2006;37(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2005.06.006. Epub 2005 Jul 27. Micron. 2006. PMID: 16171998 Review.
Cited by
- SEM2: Introducing mechanics in cell and tissue modeling using coarse-grained homogeneous particle dynamics.
Chattaraj S, Torre M, Kalcher C, Stukowski A, Morganti S, Reali A, Pasqualini FS. Chattaraj S, et al. APL Bioeng. 2023 Dec 5;7(4):046118. doi: 10.1063/5.0166829. eCollection 2023 Dec. APL Bioeng. 2023. PMID: 38075209 Free PMC article. - Cell adhesion strength is controlled by intermolecular spacing of adhesion receptors.
Selhuber-Unkel C, Erdmann T, López-García M, Kessler H, Schwarz US, Spatz JP. Selhuber-Unkel C, et al. Biophys J. 2010 Feb 17;98(4):543-51. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.11.001. Biophys J. 2010. PMID: 20159150 Free PMC article. - Quantifying force transmission through fibroblasts: changes of traction forces under external shearing.
Huth S, Blumberg JW, Probst D, Lammerding J, Schwarz US, Selhuber-Unkel C. Huth S, et al. Eur Biophys J. 2022 Mar;51(2):157-169. doi: 10.1007/s00249-021-01576-8. Epub 2021 Oct 28. Eur Biophys J. 2022. PMID: 34713316 Free PMC article. - Mechanosensitive shivering of model tissues under controlled aspiration.
Guevorkian K, Gonzalez-Rodriguez D, Carlier C, Dufour S, Brochard-Wyart F. Guevorkian K, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13387-92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105741108. Epub 2011 Jul 15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011. PMID: 21771735 Free PMC article. - Scanning probe recognition microscopy investigation of tissue scaffold properties.
Fan Y, Chen Q, Ayres VM, Baczewski AD, Udpa L, Kumar S. Fan Y, et al. Int J Nanomedicine. 2007;2(4):651-61. Int J Nanomedicine. 2007. PMID: 18203431 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources