Distributed neural representation of expected value - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
Distributed neural representation of expected value
Brian Knutson et al. J Neurosci. 2005.
Abstract
Anticipated reward magnitude and probability comprise dual components of expected value (EV), a cornerstone of economic and psychological theory. However, the neural mechanisms that compute EV have not been characterized. Using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, we examined neural activation as subjects anticipated monetary gains and losses that varied in magnitude and probability. Group analyses indicated that, although the subcortical nucleus accumbens (NAcc) activated proportional to anticipated gain magnitude, the cortical mesial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) additionally activated according to anticipated gain probability. Individual difference analyses indicated that, although NAcc activation correlated with self-reported positive arousal, MPFC activation correlated with probability estimates. These findings suggest that mesolimbic brain regions support the computation of EV in an ascending and distributed manner: whereas subcortical regions represent an affective component, cortical regions also represent a probabilistic component, and, furthermore, may integrate the two.
Figures
Figure 1.
Probabilistic monetary-incentive delay-task trial structure.
Figure 2.
Group maps of regions whose activation correlates with the linear model of expected value. Warm colors signify activation, whereas cool colors signify deactivation (threshold, p < 10-5). A, Anterior; L, left.
Figure 3.
Group maps of contrasts related to distinct terms of expected value. Maps illustrate the interaction of VAL by MAG(V), the main effect of PRB (P), and the interaction of VAL by MAG by PRB (EV). Warm colors signify activation, whereas cool colors signify deactivation (threshold, p < 10-5). A, Anterior; R, right.
Figure 4.
Peak percentage signal change by gain trial type for right VOIs. Bars represent means ± SEM (n = 14). Trial alignment (left to right) reflects expected value (low to high). Symbols indicate significant difference from the low (+, >$0.00) and middle (++, >$1.00 and >$0.00) magnitude incentive conditions, matched for valence and probability (within-subject pairwise comparisons; p < 0.005, corrected for 9 comparisons). ACing, Anterior cingulate. Error bars represent SEM.
Figure 5.
VOI time courses and functional correlations. A, Activation time courses taken from the right MPFC VOI for +$5.00 gain trials of varying probabilities (*, 80 vs 20% probability of success; p < 0.05; two-tailed _t_ test). **_B_**, Correlation of percentage hit estimate for high- versus low-probability trials with percentage signal change in the right MPFC VOI for high- versus low-probability +$5.00 gain trials (lag, 4 s; _r_ = 0.51; _p_ < 0.05; one-tailed). **_C_**, Activation time courses taken from the right NAcc VOI for gain trials of varying magnitudes (**, +$5.00 vs +$1.00 and +$0.00; *, 1.00vs1.00 vs 1.00vs0.00; p < 0.05; two-tailed t test). D, Correlation of self-reported positive arousal in response to +$5.00 cues with percentage signal change in the right NAcc VOI in response to +$5.00 cues (lag, 4 s; r = 0.52; p < 0.05; one-tailed). ant, Anticipation; rsp, response; Prob, probability; MD, mean-deviated. Error bars represent SEM.
Similar articles
- Effort discounting in human nucleus accumbens.
Botvinick MM, Huffstetler S, McGuire JT. Botvinick MM, et al. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009 Mar;9(1):16-27. doi: 10.3758/CABN.9.1.16. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19246324 Free PMC article. - A region of mesial prefrontal cortex tracks monetarily rewarding outcomes: characterization with rapid event-related fMRI.
Knutson B, Fong GW, Bennett SM, Adams CM, Hommer D. Knutson B, et al. Neuroimage. 2003 Feb;18(2):263-72. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(02)00057-5. Neuroimage. 2003. PMID: 12595181 - Available alternative incentives modulate anticipatory nucleus accumbens activation.
Cooper JC, Hollon NG, Wimmer GE, Knutson B. Cooper JC, et al. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009 Dec;4(4):409-16. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsp031. Epub 2009 Oct 20. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19843618 Free PMC article. - Splitting the difference: how does the brain code reward episodes?
Knutson B, Wimmer GE. Knutson B, et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 May;1104:54-69. doi: 10.1196/annals.1390.020. Epub 2007 Apr 7. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007. PMID: 17416922 Review. - Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reward prediction.
Knutson B, Cooper JC. Knutson B, et al. Curr Opin Neurol. 2005 Aug;18(4):411-7. doi: 10.1097/01.wco.0000173463.24758.f6. Curr Opin Neurol. 2005. PMID: 16003117 Review.
Cited by
- High stakes slow responding, but do not help overcome Pavlovian biases in humans.
Algermissen J, den Ouden HEM. Algermissen J, et al. Learn Mem. 2024 Sep 16;31(8):a054017. doi: 10.1101/lm.054017.124. Print 2024 Aug. Learn Mem. 2024. PMID: 39284619 - The Mesocortical System Encodes the Strength of Subsequent Force Generation.
Sugawara SK, Nishimura Y. Sugawara SK, et al. Neurosci Insights. 2024 May 30;19:26331055241256948. doi: 10.1177/26331055241256948. eCollection 2024. Neurosci Insights. 2024. PMID: 38827248 Free PMC article. - Neural basis of reward expectancy inducing proactive aggression.
Gong X, Hu B, Liao S, Qi B, He Q, Xia LX. Gong X, et al. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Aug;24(4):694-706. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01192-x. Epub 2024 May 31. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38819625 - Annual Research Review: Neuroimmune network model of depression: a developmental perspective.
Nusslock R, Alloy LB, Brody GH, Miller GE. Nusslock R, et al. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2024 Apr;65(4):538-567. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13961. Epub 2024 Mar 1. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38426610 Review. - Enhanced motor network engagement during reward gain anticipation in fibromyalgia.
Park SH, Michael AM, Baker AK, Lei C, Martucci KT. Park SH, et al. Cortex. 2024 Apr;173:161-174. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.12.017. Epub 2024 Feb 7. Cortex. 2024. PMID: 38417389
References
- Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR (2000) Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 10: 295-307. - PubMed
- Breiter HC, Aharon I, Kahneman D, Dale A, Shizgal P (2001) Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses. Neuron 30: 619-639. - PubMed
- Camille N, Coricelli G, Sallet J, Pradat-Diehl P, Duhamel JR, Sirigu A (2004) The involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex inn the experience of regret. Science 304: 1167-1170. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources