Patient preferences in randomised controlled trials: conceptual framework and implications for research - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
Patient preferences in randomised controlled trials: conceptual framework and implications for research
Peter Bower et al. Soc Sci Med. 2005 Aug.
Abstract
Patient preferences have recently been highlighted as a potential threat to the validity of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Although there have been significant methodological and statistical developments in relation to these issues, comparatively little attention has been paid to the development of a conceptual model concerning preferences and their effects on decision-making. This article describes the development of such a model, which was undertaken in parallel with a systematic review of the empirical data concerning preference effects. The model describes the concept of preference in terms of theoretical concepts from the psychological and economics literature, and describes a preliminary model of the development and operation of preferences in the context of RCTs. The paper then examines the implications of the model for informed consent and recruitment procedures. Key issues for future research are also outlined.
Similar articles
- Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.
King M, Nazareth I, Lampe F, Bower P, Chandler M, Morou M, Sibbald B, Lai R. King M, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2005 Sep;9(35):1-186, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9350. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 16153352 Review. - Recruitment to a trial of self-care skills training in long-term health conditions: analysis of the impact of patient attitudes and preferences.
Bower P, Kennedy A, Reeves D, Gately C, Lee V, Rogers A. Bower P, et al. Contemp Clin Trials. 2006 Feb;27(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2005.09.007. Epub 2005 Nov 8. Contemp Clin Trials. 2006. PMID: 16278102 - Impact of participant and physician intervention preferences on randomized trials: a systematic review.
King M, Nazareth I, Lampe F, Bower P, Chandler M, Morou M, Sibbald B, Lai R. King M, et al. JAMA. 2005 Mar 2;293(9):1089-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.9.1089. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 15741531 Review. - Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J, Tappenden P, Rawdin A, Johnson M, Kaltenthaler E, Paisley S, Papaioannou D, Shippam A. Chilcott J, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250. Health Technol Assess. 2010. PMID: 20501062 Review. - What do our patients understand about their trial participation? Assessing patients' understanding of their informed consent consultation about randomised clinical trials.
Behrendt C, Gölz T, Roesler C, Bertz H, Wünsch A. Behrendt C, et al. J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):74-80. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.035485. Epub 2010 Nov 23. J Med Ethics. 2011. PMID: 21098797
Cited by
- Clinical and Research Implications of a Cochrane Systematic Review of Acupuncture for Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain.
Yang E, Lu W, Napadow V, Wayne PM. Yang E, et al. Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2024 Aug 1;13:27536130241261161. doi: 10.1177/27536130241261161. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2024. PMID: 39099638 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available. - Effects of an interactive web-based support system via mobile phone on preference-based patient participation in patients living with hypertension - a randomized controlled trial in primary care.
Vestala H, Bendtsen M, Midlöv P, Kjellgren K, Eldh AC. Vestala H, et al. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Mar;42(1):225-233. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2301567. Epub 2024 Feb 7. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024. PMID: 38214748 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Factors associated with recruitment to randomised controlled trials in general practice: a systematic mixed studies review.
Moffat KR, Shi W, Cannon P, Sullivan F. Moffat KR, et al. Trials. 2023 Feb 6;24(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06865-x. Trials. 2023. PMID: 36747260 Free PMC article. Review. - The healthcare buffet: preferences in the clinical decision-making process for patients with musculoskeletal pain.
Bialosky JE, Cleland JA, Mintken P, Beneciuk JM, Bishop MD. Bialosky JE, et al. J Man Manip Ther. 2022 Apr;30(2):68-77. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2021.1989754. Epub 2021 Oct 17. J Man Manip Ther. 2022. PMID: 34657575 Free PMC article. - The challenge of equipoise in trials with a surgical and non-surgical comparison: a qualitative synthesis using meta-ethnography.
Davies L, Beard D, Cook JA, Price A, Osbeck I, Toye F. Davies L, et al. Trials. 2021 Oct 7;22(1):678. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05403-5. Trials. 2021. PMID: 34620194 Free PMC article. Review.