The neural correlates of motor skill automaticity - PubMed (original) (raw)

The neural correlates of motor skill automaticity

Russell A Poldrack et al. J Neurosci. 2005.

Abstract

Acquisition of a new skill is generally associated with a decrease in the need for effortful control over performance, leading to the development of automaticity. Automaticity by definition has been achieved when performance of a primary task is minimally affected by other ongoing tasks. The neural basis of automaticity was examined by testing subjects in a serial reaction time (SRT) task under both single-task and dual-task conditions. The diminishing cost of dual-task performance was used as an index for automaticity. Subjects performed the SRT task during two functional magnetic imaging sessions separated by 3 h of behavioral training over multiple days. Behavioral data showed that, by the end of testing, subjects had automated performance of the SRT task. Before behavioral training, performance of the SRT task concurrently with the secondary task elicited activation in a wide network of frontal and striatal regions, as well as parietal lobe. After extensive behavioral training, dual-task performance showed comparatively less activity in bilateral ventral premotor regions, right middle frontal gyrus, and right caudate body; activity in other prefrontal and striatal regions decreased equally for single-task and dual-task conditions. These data suggest that lateral and dorsolateral prefrontal regions, and their corresponding striatal targets, subserve the executive processes involved in novice dual-task performance. The results also showed that supplementary motor area and putamen/globus pallidus regions showed training-related decreases for sequence conditions but not for random conditions, confirming the role of these regions in the representation of learned motor sequences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic of the task design. A, Blocked design used during fMRI scanning. ST, Single task; DT, dual task; SEQ, sequence; RAND, pseudorandom. The ordering of single-/dual-task blocks was constant for all subjects, whereas the order of sequence and random blocks was counterbalanced across runs and subjects. B, Structure of the training sessions, showing alternation of sequence/pseudorandom blocks and placement of early/late dual-task probe blocks.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Response time data from fMRI scans, with SE bars. ST, Single task; DT, dual task; Seq, sequence; Rand, pseudorandom.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Response time data from training, separated by single-/dual-task and sequence/random conditions. ST, Single task; DT, dual task; seq, sequence; rand, pseudorandom.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Thresholded statistical map for comparison of single-task condition (averaged over sequence and random blocks) versus rest (p < 0.05, cluster corrected for multiple comparisons). The top row presents results from pretraining session, and the bottom row presents posttraining results.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Thresholded statistical map for comparison of single-task versus dual-task conditions (averaged over sequence and random conditions) (p < 0.05, cluster corrected for multiple comparisons). The top row presents results from pretraining session, and the bottom row presents posttraining results.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Thresholded statistical map for interaction between pretraining/posttraining and single/dual task (p < 0.05, cluster corrected for multiple comparisons).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Bar graphs of signal extracted from regions of interest, with SE. Statistical analyses of these data and stereotactic locations for each region are presented in Table 3. L, Left; R, right; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; SEQ, sequence; RAND, pseudorandom.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA (2004) Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 8: 170-177. - PubMed
    1. Asaad WF, Rainer G, Miller EK (1998) Neural activity in the primate prefrontal cortex during associative learning. Neuron 21: 1399-1407. - PubMed
    1. Bunge SA, Kahn I, Wallis JD, Miller EK, Wagner AD (2003) Neural circuits subserving the retrieval and maintenance of abstract rules. J Neurophysiol 90: 3419-3428. - PubMed
    1. Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 201-215. - PubMed
    1. Curran T, Keele SW (1993) Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 19: 189-202.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources