Robotic mitral valve surgery: a United States multicenter trial - PubMed (original) (raw)
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Jun;129(6):1395-404.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.07.050.
Affiliations
- PMID: 15942584
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.07.050
Free article
Clinical Trial
Robotic mitral valve surgery: a United States multicenter trial
L Wiley Nifong et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Jun.
Free article
Abstract
Objective: In a prospective phase II Food and Drug Administration trial, robotic mitral valve repairs were performed in 112 patients at 10 centers by using the da Vinci surgical system. The safety of performing valve repairs with computerized telemanipulation was studied.
Methods: After institutional review board approval, informed consent was obtained. Patients had moderate to severe mitral regurgitation. Operative technique included peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass, a 4- to 5-cm right minithoracotomy, a transthoracic aortic crossclamp, and antegrade cardioplegia. The successful study end point was grade 0 or 1 mitral regurgitation by transthoracic echocardiography at 1 month after surgery.
Results: Valve repairs included quadrangular resections, sliding plasties, edge-to-edge approximations, and both chordal transfers and replacements. The average age was 56.4 +/- 0.09 years (mean +/- SEM). There were 77 (68.8%) men and 35 (31.2%) women. Valve pathology was myxomatous degeneration in 105 (91.1%), and 103 (92.0%) had type II leaflet prolapse. Leaflet repair times averaged 36.7 +/- 0.2 minutes, with annuloplasty times of 39.6 +/- 0.1 minutes. Total robot, aortic crossclamp, and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 77.9 +/- 0.3 minutes, 2.1 +/- 0.1 hours, and 2.8 +/- 0.1 hours, respectively. On 1-month transthoracic echocardiography, 9 (8.0%) had grade 2 mitral regurgitation, and 6 (5.4%) of these had reoperations (5 replacements and 1 repair). There were no deaths, strokes, or device-related complications.
Conclusions: Multiple surgical teams performed robotic mitral valve repairs safely early in development of this procedure, with a reoperation rate of 5.4%. Advancements in robotic design and adjunctive technologies may help in the evolution of this minimally invasive technique by decreasing operative times.
Similar articles
- Robotic mitral valve repair: experience with the da Vinci system.
Nifong LW, Chu VF, Bailey BM, Maziarz DM, Sorrell VL, Holbert D, Chitwood WR Jr. Nifong LW, et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Feb;75(2):438-42; discussion 443. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04554-x. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003. PMID: 12607651 - Three hundred robotic-assisted mitral valve repairs: the Cedars-Sinai experience.
Ramzy D, Trento A, Cheng W, De Robertis MA, Mirocha J, Ruzza A, Kass RM. Ramzy D, et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.035. Epub 2013 Nov 4. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014. PMID: 24199760 - Robotic mitral valve repairs in 300 patients: a single-center experience.
Chitwood WR Jr, Rodriguez E, Chu MW, Hassan A, Ferguson TB, Vos PW, Nifong LW. Chitwood WR Jr, et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Aug;136(2):436-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.03.053. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 18692654 - Robotic mitral surgery at East Carolina University: a 6 year experience.
RodrÃguez E, Kypson AP, Moten SC, Nifong LW, Chitwood WR Jr. RodrÃguez E, et al. Int J Med Robot. 2006 Sep;2(3):211-5. doi: 10.1002/rcs.80. Int J Med Robot. 2006. PMID: 17520634 Review. - Robotic mitral valve repair.
Grodanz E. Grodanz E. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 Jul-Aug;30(4):325-31. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000157. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015. PMID: 24763355 Review.
Cited by
- The most influential papers in mitral valve surgery; a bibliometric analysis.
Allen N, O'Sullivan K, Jones JM. Allen N, et al. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jul 20;15(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01214-y. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020. PMID: 32690042 Free PMC article. - Robot-assisted cardiac surgery.
Ishikawa N, Watanabe G. Ishikawa N, et al. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;21(4):322-8. doi: 10.5761/atcs.ra.15-00145. Epub 2015 Jul 2. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015. PMID: 26134073 Free PMC article. Review. - Comparison of robotic- and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer: updated short- and long-term results.
Gao Y, Xi H, Qiao Z, Li J, Zhang K, Xie T, Shen W, Cui J, Wei B, Chen L. Gao Y, et al. Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):528-534. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6327-5. Epub 2018 Jul 16. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30014325 - The 100 most influential manuscripts in robotic surgery: a bibliometric analysis.
Connelly TM, Malik Z, Sehgal R, Byrnes G, Coffey JC, Peirce C. Connelly TM, et al. J Robot Surg. 2020 Feb;14(1):155-165. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00956-9. Epub 2019 Apr 4. J Robot Surg. 2020. PMID: 30949890 - Clinical outcomes of left main coronary artery disease patients undergoing three different revascularization approaches.
Su CS, Chen YW, Shen CH, Liu TJ, Chang Y, Lee WL. Su CS, et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(7):e9778. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009778. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 29443740 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources