Late priming and variability of epitope-specific CD8+ T cell responses during a persistent virus infection - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
. 2005 Jun 15;174(12):7950-60.
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.12.7950.
Affiliations
- PMID: 15944301
- DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.12.7950
Comparative Study
Late priming and variability of epitope-specific CD8+ T cell responses during a persistent virus infection
Christopher C Kemball et al. J Immunol. 2005.
Abstract
Control of persistently infecting viruses requires that antiviral CD8(+) T cells sustain their numbers and effector function. In this study, we monitored epitope-specific CD8(+) T cells during acute and persistent phases of infection by polyoma virus, a mouse pathogen that is capable of potent oncogenicity. We identified several novel polyoma-specific CD8(+) T cell epitopes in C57BL/6 mice, a mouse strain highly resistant to polyoma virus-induced tumors. Each of these epitopes is derived from the viral T proteins, nonstructural proteins produced by both productively and nonproductively (and potentially transformed) infected cells. In contrast to CD8(+) T cell responses described in other microbial infection mouse models, we found substantial variability between epitope-specific CD8(+) T cell responses in their kinetics of expansion and contraction during acute infection, maintenance during persistent infection, as well as their expression of cytokine receptors and cytokine profiles. This epitope-dependent variability also extended to differences in maturation of functional avidity from acute to persistent infection, despite a narrowing in TCR repertoire across all three specificities. Using a novel minimal myeloablation-bone marrow chimera approach, we visualized priming of epitope-specific CD8(+) T cells during persistent virus infection. Interestingly, epitope-specific CD8(+) T cells differed in CD62L-selectin expression profiles when primed in acute or persistent phases of infection, indicating that the context of priming affects CD8(+) T cell heterogeneity. In summary, persistent polyoma virus infection both quantitatively and qualitatively shapes the antiviral CD8(+) T cell response.
Similar articles
- Cutting edge: rapid in vivo CTL activity by polyoma virus-specific effector and memory CD8+ T cells.
Byers AM, Kemball CC, Moser JM, Lukacher AE. Byers AM, et al. J Immunol. 2003 Jul 1;171(1):17-21. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.1.17. J Immunol. 2003. PMID: 12816977 - Early virus-associated bystander events affect the fitness of the CD8 T cell response to persistent virus infection.
Andrews NP, Pack CD, Vezys V, Barber GN, Lukacher AE. Andrews NP, et al. J Immunol. 2007 Jun 1;178(11):7267-75. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.7267. J Immunol. 2007. PMID: 17513776 - Costimulation requirements for antiviral CD8+ T cells differ for acute and persistent phases of polyoma virus infection.
Kemball CC, Lee ED, Szomolanyi-Tsuda E, Pearson TC, Larsen CP, Lukacher AE. Kemball CC, et al. J Immunol. 2006 Feb 1;176(3):1814-24. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1814. J Immunol. 2006. PMID: 16424212 - Immunity to polyoma virus infection and tumorigenesis.
Moser JM, Lukacher AE. Moser JM, et al. Viral Immunol. 2001;14(3):199-216. doi: 10.1089/088282401753266738. Viral Immunol. 2001. PMID: 11572632 Review. - Immunity to polyomavirus infection: the polyomavirus-mouse model.
Swanson PA 2nd, Lukacher AE, Szomolanyi-Tsuda E. Swanson PA 2nd, et al. Semin Cancer Biol. 2009 Aug;19(4):244-51. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 Feb 14. Semin Cancer Biol. 2009. PMID: 19505652 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- Heterogeneity among viral antigen-specific CD4+ T cells and their de novo recruitment during persistent polyomavirus infection.
Lin E, Kemball CC, Hadley A, Wilson JJ, Hofstetter AR, Pack CD, Lukacher AE. Lin E, et al. J Immunol. 2010 Aug 1;185(3):1692-700. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0904210. Epub 2010 Jul 9. J Immunol. 2010. PMID: 20622115 Free PMC article. - Gamma interferon controls mouse polyomavirus infection in vivo.
Wilson JJ, Lin E, Pack CD, Frost EL, Hadley A, Swimm AI, Wang J, Dong Y, Breeden CP, Kalman D, Newell KA, Lukacher AE. Wilson JJ, et al. J Virol. 2011 Oct;85(19):10126-34. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00761-11. Epub 2011 Jul 20. J Virol. 2011. PMID: 21775464 Free PMC article. - Buffered memory: a hypothesis for the maintenance of functional, virus-specific CD8(+) T cells during cytomegalovirus infection.
Snyder CM. Snyder CM. Immunol Res. 2011 Dec;51(2-3):195-204. doi: 10.1007/s12026-011-8251-9. Immunol Res. 2011. PMID: 22058020 Review. - Memory inflation during chronic viral infection is maintained by continuous production of short-lived, functional T cells.
Snyder CM, Cho KS, Bonnett EL, van Dommelen S, Shellam GR, Hill AB. Snyder CM, et al. Immunity. 2008 Oct 17;29(4):650-9. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.07.017. Immunity. 2008. PMID: 18957267 Free PMC article. - IL-21 from high-affinity CD4 T cells drives differentiation of brain-resident CD8 T cells during persistent viral infection.
Ren HM, Kolawole EM, Ren M, Jin G, Netherby-Winslow CS, Wade Q, Shwetank, Rahman ZSM, Evavold BD, Lukacher AE. Ren HM, et al. Sci Immunol. 2020 Sep 18;5(51):eabb5590. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abb5590. Sci Immunol. 2020. PMID: 32948671 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials