A meta-analysis of time-series studies of ozone and mortality with comparison to the national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study - PubMed (original) (raw)

Meta-Analysis

A meta-analysis of time-series studies of ozone and mortality with comparison to the national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study

Michelle L Bell et al. Epidemiology. 2005 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Although many time-series studies of ozone and mortality have identified positive associations, others have yielded null or inconclusive results, making the results of these studies difficult to interpret.

Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of 144 effect estimates from 39 time-series studies, and estimated pooled effects by lags, age groups, cause-specific mortality, and concentration metrics. We compared results with pooled estimates from the National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study (NMMAPS), a time-series study of 95 large U.S. urban centers from 1987 to 2000.

Results: Both meta-analysis and NMMAPS results provided strong evidence of a short-term association between ozone and mortality, with larger effects for cardiovascular and respiratory mortality, the elderly, and current-day ozone exposure. In both analyses, results were insensitive to adjustment for particulate matter and model specifications. In the meta-analysis, a 10-ppb increase in daily ozone at single-day or 2-day average of lags 0, 1, or 2 days was associated with an 0.87% increase in total mortality (95% posterior interval = 0.55% to 1.18%), whereas the lag 0 NMMAPS estimate is 0.25% (0.12% to 0.39%). Several findings indicate possible publication bias: meta-analysis results were consistently larger than those from NMMAPS; meta-analysis pooled estimates at lags 0 or 1 were larger when only a single lag was reported than when estimates for multiple lags were reported; and heterogeneity of city-specific estimates in the meta-analysis were larger than with NMMAPS.

Conclusions: This study provides evidence of short-term associations between ozone and mortality as well as evidence of publication bias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

Posterior distributions of pooled log-relative rates of all-cause mortality associated with 10-ppb increase in ozone in NMMAPS (95 cities) and for the meta-analysis of the United States (11 estimates).

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2

City-specific posterior means and 95% posterior intervals of the log-relative rate of mortality associated with 10-ppb increase in ozone for the 8 cities included in NMMAPS and in the meta-analysis.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3

Marginal posterior distribution of the log of heterogeneity parameter (τ) for: 1) meta-analysis of 11 U.S estimates; 2) meta-analysis of 41 U.S. and non-U.S. estimates; and 3) for 95 NMMAPS cities in Bell et al.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. US Environmental Protection Agency. National ambient air quality standards for particulate matter, final rule 62. Federal Register. 1997:38651.
    1. The Ozone Report. EPA454/K-01-001. Research Triangle Park, NC: US EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; 2004. US Environmental Protection Agency.
    1. Anderson HR, Ponce de Leon A, Bland JM, et al. Air pollution and daily mortality in London: 1987–92. BMJ. 1996;321:665–669. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cifuentes LA, Vega J, Köpfer K, et al. Effect of the fine fraction of particulate matter versus the coarse mass and other pollutants on daily mortality in Santiago, Chile. J. Air Waste Manage Assoc. 2000;50:1287–1298. - PubMed
    1. Ha EH, Lee JT, Kim H, et al. Infant susceptibility of mortality to air pollution in Seoul, South Korea. Pediatrics. 2003;111:284–290. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources