The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature - PubMed (original) (raw)

The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature

René Fejer et al. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of neck pain (NP) in the world population and to identify areas of methodological variation between studies. A systematic search was conducted in five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, OSH-ROM, and PsycINFO), followed by a screening of reference lists of relevant papers. Included papers were extracted for information and each paper was given a quality score. Mean prevalence estimates were calculated for six prevalence periods (point, week, month, 6 months, year, and lifetime), and considered separately for age, gender, quality score, response rate, sample size, anatomical definition, geography, and publication year. Fifty-six papers were included. The six most commonly reported types of prevalence were point, week, month, 6 months, year, and lifetime. Except for lifetime prevalence, women reported more NP than men. For 1-year prevalence, Scandinavian countries reported more NP than the rest of Europe and Asia. Prevalence estimates were not affected by age, quality score, sample size, response rate, and different anatomical definitions of NP. NP is a common symptom in the population. As expected, the prevalence increases with longer prevalence periods and generally women have more NP than men. At least for 1-year prevalence Scandinavian countries report higher mean estimates than the rest of Europe and Asia. The quality of studies varies greatly but is not correlated with the prevalence estimates. Design varies considerably and standardisation is needed in future studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

The prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals of all studies for the six most commonly reported prevalence periods. The 95% confidence intervals were calculated when not provided. One study is not included [33] in the figure, as it was impossible to estimate the total prevalence for the population. The mean prevalence estimates are calculated from homogeneous study samples based on adult populations (i.e. the total number of subjects with neck pain divided by the total number of participants)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andersson HI, Ejlertsson G, Leden I, Rosenberg C. Chronic pain in a geographically defined general population: studies of differences in age, gender, social class, and pain localization. Clin J Pain. 1993;9:174–182. - PubMed
    1. Aoyagi K, Ross PD, Huang C, Wasnich RD, Hayashi T, Takemoto T. Prevalence of joint pain is higher among women in rural Japan than urban Japanese-American women in Hawaii. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999;58:315–319. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ariëns GAM, Borghouts JAJ, Koes BW. Neck pain. In: Crombie IK, Croft PR, Linton SJ, LeResche L, Korff M, editors. Epidemiology of pain. Seattle: IASP Press; 1999. pp. 235–256.
    1. Badley EM, Tennant A. Changing profile of joint disorders with age: findings from a postal survey of the population of Calderdale, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992;51:366–371. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bassols A, Bosch F, Banos JE. How does the general population treat their pain? A survey in Catalonia, Spain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002;23:318–328. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources