Energetics of the strand separation transition in superhelical DNA - PubMed (original) (raw)
Energetics of the strand separation transition in superhelical DNA
C J Benham. J Mol Biol. 1992.
Abstract
In this paper the values of three free energy parameters governing the superhelical strand separation transition are determined by analysis of available experimental data. These are the free energy, a, needed to initiate a run of separation, the torsional stiffness, C, associated with interstrand winding of the two single strands comprising a separated site and the coefficient, K, of the quadratic free energy associated to residual linking. The experimental data used in this analysis are the locations and relative amounts of strand separation occurring in the pBR322 DNA molecule and the measured residual linking, both evaluated over a range of negative linking differences. The analytic method used treats strand separation as a heteropolymeric, co-operative, two-state transition to a torsionally deformable alternative conformation, which takes place in a circular DNA molecule constrained by the constancy of its linking number. The values determined for these parameters under the experimental conditions (T = 310 K, pH = 7.0, monovalent cation concentration = 0.01 M) are a = 10.84(+/- 0.2) kcal/mol, C = 2.5(+/- 0.3) x 10(-13) erg/rad2 and K = 2350(+/- 80) RT/N, where N is the molecular length in base-pairs. In order to assess the accuracy of the author's theoretical methods, these free energy parameters are incorporated into the analysis of superhelical strand separation in different molecules and under other conditions than those used in their evaluation. First, the temperature dependence of transition is treated, then superhelical strand separation is analyzed in a series of DNA molecules having systematic sequence modifications, and the results of these theoretical analyses are compared with those from experiments. In all molecules, transition is predicted in the range of linking differences where it is seen experimentally. Moreover, it occurs at the specific sequence locations that the analysis predicts, and with approximately the predicted relative amounts of transition at each location. The known sensitivities of this transition to changes of temperature and to small sequence modifications are predicted in a quantitatively precise manner by the theoretical results. The demonstrated high-level precision of these theoretical methods provides a tool for the screening of DNA sequences for sites susceptible to superhelical strand separation, some of which may have regulatory or other biological significance.
Similar articles
- Brownian dynamics simulations of sequence-dependent duplex denaturation in dynamically superhelical DNA.
Mielke SP, Grønbech-Jensen N, Krishnan VV, Fink WH, Benham CJ. Mielke SP, et al. J Chem Phys. 2005 Sep 22;123(12):124911. doi: 10.1063/1.2038767. J Chem Phys. 2005. PMID: 16392531 - Energetics of superhelicity and of B-Z transitions in superhelical DNA.
Benham CJ. Benham CJ. Cell Biophys. 1987 Oct;10(3):193-204. doi: 10.1007/BF02797340. Cell Biophys. 1987. PMID: 2446766 - Theoretical analysis of competing conformational transitions in superhelical DNA.
Zhabinskaya D, Benham CJ. Zhabinskaya D, et al. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(4):e1002484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002484. Epub 2012 Apr 26. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012. PMID: 22570598 Free PMC article. - The influence of tertiary structural restraints on conformational transitions in superhelical DNA.
Benham CJ. Benham CJ. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Dec 10;15(23):9985-95. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.23.9985. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987. PMID: 3320960 Free PMC article. Review. - DNA mechanics.
Benham CJ, Mielke SP. Benham CJ, et al. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2005;7:21-53. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.062403.132016. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2005. PMID: 16004565 Review.
Cited by
- Correlating fluorescence microscopy, optical and magnetic tweezers to study single chiral biopolymers such as DNA.
Shepherd JW, Guilbaud S, Zhou Z, Howard JAL, Burman M, Schaefer C, Kerrigan A, Steele-King C, Noy A, Leake MC. Shepherd JW, et al. Nat Commun. 2024 Mar 29;15(1):2748. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47126-6. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 38553446 Free PMC article. - DNA superhelicity.
Benham CJ. Benham CJ. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 11;52(1):22-48. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad1092. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024. PMID: 37994702 Free PMC article. - Stabilization of DNA fork junctions by Smc5/6 complexes revealed by single-molecule imaging.
Tanasie NL, Gutiérrez-Escribano P, Jaklin S, Aragon L, Stigler J. Tanasie NL, et al. Cell Rep. 2022 Dec 6;41(10):111778. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111778. Cell Rep. 2022. PMID: 36476856 Free PMC article. - Energetics of twisted DNA topologies.
Xu W, Dunlap D, Finzi L. Xu W, et al. Biophys J. 2021 Aug 17;120(16):3242-3252. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 May 8. Biophys J. 2021. PMID: 33974883 Free PMC article. Review. - How global DNA unwinding causes non-uniform stress distribution and melting of DNA.
Liebl K, Zacharias M. Liebl K, et al. PLoS One. 2020 May 15;15(5):e0232976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232976. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32413048 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous