Treatment of infections with ESBL-producing organisms: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
Treatment of infections with ESBL-producing organisms: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations
D Andes et al. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Nov.
Free article
Abstract
Susceptibility surveillance investigations have demonstrated an increased incidence of ESBL-producing Gram-negative bacilli. Case cohort studies have suggested clinical relevance associated with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaciae infection. Yet, current laboratory reporting guidelines classify a large percentage of these organisms in the susceptible category. The regulatory agencies Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (formly NCCLS) and EUCAST, which oversee these guidelines are in the process of re-evaluating the appropriateness of the current classification system. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies examine the relationship between drug exposure (pharmacokinetics), antibiotic potency (MIC), and treatment efficacy. PK/PD studies and analyses have been useful in demonstrating the relevance of increasingly less susceptible pathogens and specific emerging resistance mechanisms. Recent investigations have examined the impact of ESBL-producing Gram-negative bacilli relative to advanced generation cephalosporin pharmacokinetics. Animal model studies suggest that the pharmacodynamic target associated with efficacy in treatment of ESBL-producing organisms is the same as that in therapy against non-ESBL-producing bacteria (50% T>MIC). Simulation of human pharmacokinetics can predict the likelihood of achieving this PD target with specific cephalosporin dosing regimens. In general, the exposure from usual regimens of the advanced generation cephalosporins would not be anticipated to achieve the PD target for many of the organisms currently classified as susceptible. PK/PD analyses should be useful in re-evaluating current susceptibility breakpoints for ESBL-producing organisms and for optimising drug and regimen choice in treatment of these infections.
Similar articles
- Reevaluation of Enterobacteriaceae MIC/disk diffusion zone diameter regression scattergrams for 9 beta-lactams: adjustments of breakpoints for strains producing extended spectrum beta-lactamases.
Jones RN, Craig WA, Ambrose PG, Dudley MN, Pottumarthy S. Jones RN, et al. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005 Jul;52(3):235-46. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.02.006. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005. PMID: 16105568 - Breakpoints for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriacae: pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic considerations.
MacGowan A. MacGowan A. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Jan;14 Suppl 1:166-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01859.x. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008. PMID: 18154541 Review. - Cefepime pharmacodynamics in patients with extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and non-ESBL infections.
Lee SY, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. Lee SY, et al. J Infect. 2007 May;54(5):463-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Oct 24. J Infect. 2007. PMID: 17067681 - Reevaluation of current susceptibility breakpoints for Gram-negative rods based on pharmacodynamic assessment.
DeRyke CA, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. DeRyke CA, et al. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Jul;58(3):337-44. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.01.004. Epub 2007 Mar 9. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007. PMID: 17350206 - Resistance in gram-negative bacteria: enterobacteriaceae.
Paterson DL. Paterson DL. Am J Med. 2006 Jun;119(6 Suppl 1):S20-8; discussion S62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.03.013. Am J Med. 2006. PMID: 16735147 Review.
Cited by
- Sulbactam-durlobactam susceptibility test method development and quality control ranges for MIC and disk diffusion tests.
McLeod SM, Carter NM, Huband MD, Traczewski MM, Bradford PA, Miller AA. McLeod SM, et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Jan 17;62(1):e0122823. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01228-23. Epub 2023 Dec 14. J Clin Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 38095417 Free PMC article. - Phase I Study Assessing the Pharmacokinetic Profile, Safety, and Tolerability of a Single Dose of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients.
Bradley JS, Armstrong J, Arrieta A, Bishai R, Das S, Delair S, Edeki T, Holmes WC, Li J, Moffett KS, Mukundan D, Perez N, Romero JR, Speicher D, Sullivan JE, Zhou D. Bradley JS, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Sep 23;60(10):6252-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00862-16. Print 2016 Oct. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016. PMID: 27503642 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Advancing pediatric antimicrobial stewardship: Has pharmacodynamic dosing for gram-negative infections taken effect?
Puckett LM, Newland JG, Girotto JE. Puckett LM, et al. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2021 Dec 10;1(1):e61. doi: 10.1017/ash.2021.199. eCollection 2021. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2021. PMID: 36168509 Free PMC article. - Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam: Second-generation β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations.
van Duin D, Bonomo RA. van Duin D, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 15;63(2):234-41. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw243. Epub 2016 Apr 20. Clin Infect Dis. 2016. PMID: 27098166 Free PMC article. Review. - Simulating moxalactam dosage for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae using blood antimicrobial surveillance network data.
Huang C, Shi Q, Zheng B, Ji J, Ying C, Yu X, Wang H, Xiao Y. Huang C, et al. Infect Drug Resist. 2019 May 8;12:1199-1208. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S193712. eCollection 2019. Infect Drug Resist. 2019. PMID: 31190908 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical