Adaptive evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
. 2005 Oct 20;437(7062):1149-52.
doi: 10.1038/nature04107.
Affiliations
- PMID: 16237443
- DOI: 10.1038/nature04107
Comparative Study
Adaptive evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila
Peter Andolfatto. Nature. 2005.
Abstract
A large fraction of eukaryotic genomes consists of DNA that is not translated into protein sequence, and little is known about its functional significance. Here I show that several classes of non-coding DNA in Drosophila are evolving considerably slower than synonymous sites, and yet show an excess of between-species divergence relative to polymorphism when compared with synonymous sites. The former is a hallmark of selective constraint, but the latter is a signature of adaptive evolution, resembling general patterns of protein evolution in Drosophila. I estimate that about 40-70% of nucleotides in intergenic regions, untranslated portions of mature mRNAs (UTRs) and most intronic DNA are evolutionarily constrained relative to synonymous sites. However, I also use an extension to the McDonald-Kreitman test to show that a substantial fraction of the nucleotide divergence in these regions was driven to fixation by positive selection (about 20% for most intronic and intergenic DNA, and 60% for UTRs). On the basis of these observations, I suggest that a large fraction of the non-translated genome is functionally important and subject to both purifying selection and adaptive evolution. These results imply that, although positive selection is clearly an important facet of protein evolution, adaptive changes to non-coding DNA might have been considerably more common in the evolution of D. melanogaster.
Comment in
- Evolutionary biology: fruitfly genome is not junk.
Kondrashov AS. Kondrashov AS. Nature. 2005 Oct 20;437(7062):1106. doi: 10.1038/4371106a. Nature. 2005. PMID: 16237433 No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Mutation and selection at silent and replacement sites in the evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA.
Rand DM, Kann LM. Rand DM, et al. Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):393-407. Genetica. 1998. PMID: 9720291 - Patterns of evolutionary constraints in intronic and intergenic DNA of Drosophila.
Halligan DL, Eyre-Walker A, Andolfatto P, Keightley PD. Halligan DL, et al. Genome Res. 2004 Feb;14(2):273-9. doi: 10.1101/gr.1329204. Genome Res. 2004. PMID: 14762063 Free PMC article. - The influence of demography and weak selection on the McDonald-Kreitman test: an empirical study in Drosophila.
Parsch J, Zhang Z, Baines JF. Parsch J, et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Mar;26(3):691-8. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn297. Epub 2009 Jan 6. Mol Biol Evol. 2009. PMID: 19126864 - Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila.
Akashi H, Kliman RM, Eyre-Walker A. Akashi H, et al. Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):49-60. Genetica. 1998. PMID: 9720271 Review. - Patterns of polymorphism and divergence from noncoding sequences of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: evidence for nonequilibrium processes.
Kern AD, Begun DJ. Kern AD, et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Jan;22(1):51-62. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh269. Epub 2004 Sep 29. Mol Biol Evol. 2005. PMID: 15456897 Review.
Cited by
- Background Selection Does Not Mimic the Patterns of Genetic Diversity Produced by Selective Sweeps.
Schrider DR. Schrider DR. Genetics. 2020 Oct;216(2):499-519. doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.303469. Epub 2020 Aug 26. Genetics. 2020. PMID: 32847814 Free PMC article. - Heterogeneity in genetic diversity among non-coding loci fails to fit neutral coalescent models of population history.
Peters JL, Roberts TE, Winker K, McCracken KG. Peters JL, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031972. Epub 2012 Feb 22. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22384117 Free PMC article. - The Eukaryotic Microbiome: Origins and Implications for Fetal and Neonatal Life.
Miller WB Jr. Miller WB Jr. Front Pediatr. 2016 Sep 9;4:96. doi: 10.3389/fped.2016.00096. eCollection 2016. Front Pediatr. 2016. PMID: 27668211 Free PMC article. Review. - Elevated Linkage Disequilibrium and Signatures of Soft Sweeps Are Common in Drosophila melanogaster.
Garud NR, Petrov DA. Garud NR, et al. Genetics. 2016 Jun;203(2):863-80. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.184002. Epub 2016 Apr 20. Genetics. 2016. PMID: 27098909 Free PMC article. - Positive Selection Drives cis-regulatory Evolution Across the Threespine Stickleback Y Chromosome.
Shaw DE, Naftaly AS, White MA. Shaw DE, et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2024 Feb 1;41(2):msae020. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msae020. Mol Biol Evol. 2024. PMID: 38306314 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases