Gender, cancer experience and internet use: a comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
. 2006 May;62(10):2577-90.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.016. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
Affiliations
- PMID: 16361029
- DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.016
Comparative Study
Gender, cancer experience and internet use: a comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups
Clive Seale et al. Soc Sci Med. 2006 May.
Abstract
A new method, comparative keyword analysis, is used to compare the language of men and women with cancer in 97 research interviews and two popular internet based support groups for people with cancer. The method is suited to the conjoint qualitative and quantitative analysis of differences between large bodies of text, an alternative to the 'code and retrieval' approach used in much thematic analysis of qualitative materials. Web forums are a rich source of data about illness experience and gender differences. Marked differences in the performance of gender are evident. These differences follow linguistic and other behavioural patterns (such as social network differences) established in other contexts. Men with prostate cancer indicate in research interviews that they are more likely to seek information on the internet; women with breast cancer that they are more likely to seek social and emotional support. Men's concerns cluster around treatment information, medical personnel and procedures. Their experience of disease is more localised on particular areas of the body, while women's experience is more holistic. Women's forum postings orientate much more towards the exchange of emotional support, including concern with the impact of illness on a wide range of other people. Women's use of superlatives as well as words referring to feelings indicate their enactment of greater emotional expressivity. Web forums are platforms for an intensification of men's knowledge gathering activities. Web forums, though actually quite publicly visible, appear to be subjectively experienced by both sexes as relatively private places for the exchange of intimate personal information. The 'privacy' of the breast cancer forum facilitated interactions found in other studies to be characteristic of women's friendship groups.
Similar articles
- Breast and prostate cancer online discussion boards: a thematic analysis of gender differences and similarities.
Gooden RJ, Winefield HR. Gooden RJ, et al. J Health Psychol. 2007 Jan;12(1):103-14. doi: 10.1177/1359105307071744. J Health Psychol. 2007. PMID: 17158844 - Interviews and internet forums: a comparison of two sources of qualitative data.
Seale C, Charteris-Black J, MacFarlane A, McPherson A. Seale C, et al. Qual Health Res. 2010 May;20(5):595-606. doi: 10.1177/1049732309354094. Epub 2009 Dec 15. Qual Health Res. 2010. PMID: 20008955 - Gender accommodation in online cancer support groups.
Seale C. Seale C. Health (London). 2006 Jul;10(3):345-60. doi: 10.1177/1363459306064495. Health (London). 2006. PMID: 16775019 - Illness and Internet empowerment: writing and reading breast cancer in cyberspace.
Pitts V. Pitts V. Health (London). 2004 Jan;8(1):33-59. doi: 10.1177/1363459304038794. Health (London). 2004. PMID: 15018717 Review. - Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: a systematic literature review of online health-related support groups.
Mo PK, Malik SH, Coulson NS. Mo PK, et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Apr;75(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.029. Epub 2009 Feb 23. Patient Educ Couns. 2009. PMID: 19233586 Review.
Cited by
- How user characteristics affect use patterns in web-based illness management support for patients with breast and prostate cancer.
Børøsund E, Cvancarova M, Ekstedt M, Moore SM, Ruland CM. Børøsund E, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Mar 1;15(3):e34. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2285. J Med Internet Res. 2013. PMID: 23454601 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Exploring men's and women's experiences of depression and engagement with health professionals: more similarities than differences? A qualitative interview study.
Emslie C, Ridge D, Ziebland S, Hunt K. Emslie C, et al. BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Jul 24;8:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-43. BMC Fam Pract. 2007. PMID: 17650340 Free PMC article. - What kills us and what moves us: A comparative discourse analysis of heart disease and breast cancer.
O'Hanlon CE. O'Hanlon CE. Digit Health. 2019 May 1;5:2055207619844865. doi: 10.1177/2055207619844865. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2019. PMID: 31069103 Free PMC article. - Bladder cancer discussed on the internet: a systematic analysis of gender differences of initial posters on an online discussion board.
Lippka Y, Patschan O, Todenhöfer T, Schwentner C, Gutzeit A, Merseburger AS, Horstmann M. Lippka Y, et al. Springerplus. 2013 Sep 8;2:445. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-445. eCollection 2013. Springerplus. 2013. PMID: 24102040 Free PMC article. - Male coping processes as demonstrated in the context of a cancer-related social support group.
Trapp SK, Woods JD, Grove A, Stern M. Trapp SK, et al. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Feb;21(2):619-27. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1565-x. Epub 2012 Aug 19. Support Care Cancer. 2013. PMID: 22903162
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical