Placebo response in clinical trials of depression and its implications for research on chronic neuropathic pain - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
Placebo response in clinical trials of depression and its implications for research on chronic neuropathic pain
Robert H Dworkin et al. Neurology. 2005.
Abstract
This article reviews studies of the placebo response in antidepressant clinical trials, describes methods that have been attempted to decrease it, and discusses implications of the placebo response in depression for research on treatments for neuropathic pain. Literature reviews and research studies examining the placebo response in clinical trials of treatments for depression were reviewed. Existing data suggest that the placebo response in antidepressant clinical trials is substantial and that a high placebo response in a clinical trial is associated with a reduced likelihood of demonstrating the statistical superiority of antidepressant treatment vs. placebo. Attempts to decrease the placebo response in antidepressant clinical trials have generally not been effective. In addition, there is little evidence that decreasing the placebo response rate makes it more likely that superiority of active vs. placebo treatment will be demonstrated. Analyses of neuropathic pain clinical trial databases should be conducted to examine factors associated with trial outcomes. Aspects of neuropathic pain clinical trials that require further consideration or investigation include the following: (a) exclusion of patients with mild pain severity; (b) exclusion of patients with short episode duration; (c) maximizing reliability, validity, and responsiveness of outcome measures; (d) minimizing extraneous contact with investigative staff and other sources of nonspecific therapeutic effects; (e) trial duration; (f) minimizing the number of treatment groups; (g) flexible vs. fixed dose designs; (h) strategies for identifying patients and accelerating enrollment; (i) identification of run-in periods that reduce the placebo response rate; and (j) registration of clinical trials and publication of negative studies.
Similar articles
- Clinical trial outcome in neuropathic pain: relationship to study characteristics.
Katz J, Finnerup NB, Dworkin RH. Katz J, et al. Neurology. 2008 Jan 22;70(4):263-72. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000275528.01263.6c. Neurology. 2008. PMID: 17914067 - What can we learn from failed neuropathic pain trials?
Polydefkis M, Raja SN. Polydefkis M, et al. Neurology. 2008 Jan 22;70(4):250-1. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000298088.76718.18. Neurology. 2008. PMID: 18209199 No abstract available. - Mechanisms of neuropathic pain and their implications for the design of clinical trials.
Rowbotham MC. Rowbotham MC. Neurology. 2005 Dec 29;65(12 Suppl 4):S66-73. doi: 10.1212/wnl.65.12_suppl_4.s66. Neurology. 2005. PMID: 16385106 Review. - ECNP consensus meeting. Bipolar depression. Nice, March 2007.
Goodwin GM, Anderson I, Arango C, Bowden CL, Henry C, Mitchell PB, Nolen WA, Vieta E, Wittchen HU. Goodwin GM, et al. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008 Jul;18(7):535-49. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 May 23. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008. PMID: 18501566 Review. - Study designs and outcomes in antidepressant clinical trials.
Khan A, Schwartz K. Khan A, et al. Essent Psychopharmacol. 2005;6(4):221-6. Essent Psychopharmacol. 2005. PMID: 16041918 Review.
Cited by
- Recommendations for the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain: an overview and literature update.
Dworkin RH, O'Connor AB, Audette J, Baron R, Gourlay GK, Haanpää ML, Kent JL, Krane EJ, Lebel AA, Levy RM, Mackey SC, Mayer J, Miaskowski C, Raja SN, Rice AS, Schmader KE, Stacey B, Stanos S, Treede RD, Turk DC, Walco GA, Wells CD. Dworkin RH, et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Mar;85(3 Suppl):S3-14. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0649. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010. PMID: 20194146 Free PMC article. Review. - Pregabalin for painful HIV neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Simpson DM, Schifitto G, Clifford DB, Murphy TK, Durso-De Cruz E, Glue P, Whalen E, Emir B, Scott GN, Freeman R; 1066 HIV Neuropathy Study Group. Simpson DM, et al. Neurology. 2010 Feb 2;74(5):413-20. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ccc6ef. Neurology. 2010. PMID: 20124207 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Pharmacological treatment of painful HIV-associated sensory neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Phillips TJ, Cherry CL, Cox S, Marshall SJ, Rice AS. Phillips TJ, et al. PLoS One. 2010 Dec 28;5(12):e14433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014433. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 21203440 Free PMC article. Review. - Differences in opioid prescribing in low back pain patients with and without depression: a cross-sectional study of a national sample from the United States.
Smith JA, Fuino RL, Pesis-Katz I, Cai X, Powers B, Frazer M, Markman JD. Smith JA, et al. Pain Rep. 2017 Jun 22;2(4):e606. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000606. eCollection 2017 Jul. Pain Rep. 2017. PMID: 29392221 Free PMC article. - Anticipation of pain enhances the nociceptive transmission and functional connectivity within pain network in rats.
Wang JY, Zhang HT, Chang JY, Woodward DJ, Baccalá LA, Luo F. Wang JY, et al. Mol Pain. 2008 Aug 26;4:34. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-4-34. Mol Pain. 2008. PMID: 18724875 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical