Population-based neuropathological studies of dementia: design, methods and areas of investigation--a systematic review - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Population-based neuropathological studies of dementia: design, methods and areas of investigation--a systematic review

Julia Zaccai et al. BMC Neurol. 2006.

Abstract

Background: Prospective population-based neuropathological studies have a special place in dementia research which is under emphasised.

Methods: A systematic review of the methods of population-based neuropathological studies of dementia was carried out. These studies were assessed in relation to their representativeness of underlying populations and the clinical, neuropsychological and neuropathological approaches adopted.

Results: Six studies were found to be true population-based neuropathological studies of dementia in the older people: the Hisayama study (Japan); Vantaa 85+ study (Finland); CC75C study (Cambridge, UK); CFAS (multicentre, UK); Cache County study (Utah, USA); HAAS (Hawaï, USA). These differ in the core characteristics of their populations. The studies used standardised neuropathological methods which facilitate analyses on: clinicopathological associations and confirmation of diagnosis, assessing the validity of hierarchical models of neuropathological lesion burden; investigating the associations between neuropathological burden and risk factors including genetic factors. Examples of findings are given although there is too little overlap in the areas investigated amongst these studies to form the basis of a systematic review of the results.

Conclusion: Clinicopathological studies based on true population samples can provide unique insights in dementia. Individually they are limited in power and scope; together they represent a powerful source to translate findings from laboratory to populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Pathways through which individuals may be filtered before becoming potential research respondents. Note: In systems such as in the UK, referral from secondary and tertiary services is almost always through primary care. This is not the case in all health care systems. N = true population. n = study

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hofman A, Rocca WA, Brayne C, Breteler MM, Clarke M, Cooper B, Copeland JR, Dartigues JF, da Silva Droux A, Hagnell O. The prevalence of dementia in Europe: a collaborative study of 1980–1990 findings. Eurodem Prevalence Research Group. Int J Epidemiol. 1991;20:736–748. - PubMed
    1. Nourhashemi F, Gillette-Guyonnet S, Andrieu S, Ghisolfi A, Ousset PJ, Grandjean H, Grand A, Pous J, Vellas B, Albarede JL. Alzheimer disease: protective factors. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:643S–649S. - PubMed
    1. Amaducci L. Italian Longitudinal Study on Ageing: incidence study of dementia. Neuroepidemiology. 1992;11:19–22. - PubMed
    1. Dartigues JF, Gagnon M, Michel P, Letenneur L, Commenges D, Barberger-Gateau P, Auriacombe S, Rigal B, Bedry R, Alperovitch A, et al. [The Paquid research program on the epidemiology of dementia. Methods and initial results] Rev Neurol (Paris) 1991;147:225–230. - PubMed
    1. de Leeuw FE, de Groot JC, Achten E, Oudkerk M, Ramos LM, Heijboer R, Hofman A, Jolles J, van Gijn J, Breteler MM. Prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly people: a population based magnetic resonance imaging study. The Rotterdam Scan Study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70:9–14. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.70.1.9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources