Refinement of protein structures by iterative comparative modeling and CryoEM density fitting

. 2006 Apr 14;357(5):1655-68.

doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.01.062. Epub 2006 Feb 2.

Affiliations

PMID: 16490207
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.01.062

Maya Topf et al. J Mol Biol. 2006.

Abstract

We developed a method for structure characterization of assembly components by iterative comparative protein structure modeling and fitting into cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) density maps. Specifically, we calculate a comparative model of a given component by considering many alternative alignments between the target sequence and a related template structure while optimizing the fit of a model into the corresponding density map. The method relies on the previously developed Moulder protocol that iterates over alignment, model building, and model assessment. The protocol was benchmarked using 20 varied target-template pairs of known structures with less than 30% sequence identity and corresponding simulated density maps at resolutions from 5A to 25A. Relative to the models based on the best existing sequence profile alignment methods, the percentage of C(alpha) atoms that are within 5A of the corresponding C(alpha) atoms in the superposed native structure increases on average from 52% to 66%, which is half-way between the starting models and the models from the best possible alignments (82%). The test also reveals that despite the improvements in the accuracy of the fitness function, this function is still the bottleneck in reducing the remaining errors. To demonstrate the usefulness of the protocol, we applied it to the upper domain of the P8 capsid protein of rice dwarf virus that has been studied by cryoEM at 6.8A. The C(alpha) root-mean-square deviation of the model based on the remotely related template, bluetongue virus VP7, improved from 8.7A to 6.0A, while the best possible model has a C(alpha) RMSD value of 5.3A. Moreover, the resulting model fits better into the cryoEM density map than the initial template structure. The method is being implemented in our program MODELLER for protein structure modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints and will be applicable to the rapidly increasing number of cryoEM density maps of macromolecular assemblies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Cited by

Automated protein structure modeling with SWISS-MODEL Workspace and the Protein Model Portal.
Bordoli L, Schwede T. Bordoli L, et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;857:107-36. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-588-6_5. Methods Mol Biol. 2012. PMID: 22323219 Free PMC article.
Ab initio modeling of the herpesvirus VP26 core domain assessed by CryoEM density.
Baker ML, Jiang W, Wedemeyer WJ, Rixon FJ, Baker D, Chiu W. Baker ML, et al. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Oct 27;2(10):e146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020146. Epub 2006 Sep 27. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006. PMID: 17069457 Free PMC article.
Structure prediction for the helical skeletons detected from the low resolution protein density map.
Al Nasr K, Sun W, He J. Al Nasr K, et al. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 18;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S1-S44. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010. PMID: 20122218 Free PMC article.
From isotropic to anisotropic side chain representations: comparison of three models for residue contact estimation.
Sun W, He J. Sun W, et al. PLoS One. 2011 Apr 28;6(4):e19238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019238. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21552527 Free PMC article.
Analytical Approaches to Improve Accuracy in Solving the Protein Topology Problem.
Al Nasr K, Yousef F, Jebril R, Jones C. Al Nasr K, et al. Molecules. 2018 Jan 23;23(2):28. doi: 10.3390/molecules23020028. Molecules. 2018. PMID: 29360779 Free PMC article.

Refinement of protein structures by iterative comparative modeling and CryoEM density fitting - PubMed (original) (raw)