Participating in a trial in a critical situation: a qualitative study in pregnancy - PubMed (original) (raw)
Participating in a trial in a critical situation: a qualitative study in pregnancy
S Kenyon et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Apr.
Abstract
Background: Randomised controlled trials of interventions in critical situations are necessary to establish safety and evaluate outcomes. Pregnant women have been identified as a potentially vulnerable population.
Objective: To explore women's experiences of being recruited to ORACLE, a randomised controlled trial of antibiotics in pre-term labour.
Methods: Twenty qualitative interviews were conducted with women who had participated in ORACLE. Analysis was based on the constant comparative method.
Results: Women gave prominence to the socioemotional aspects of their interactions with healthcare professionals in making decisions on trial participation. Comments on the quality of written and spoken information were generally favourable, but women's accounts suggest that the stressful nature of the situation affected their ability to absorb the information. Women generally had poor understanding of trial design and practices. The main motivation for trial participation was the possibility of an improved outcome for the baby. The second and less prominent motivation was the opportunity to help others, but this was conditional on there being no risks associated with trial participation. In judging the risks of participation, women seemed to draw on "common sense" understandings including a perception that antibiotics were risk free.
Discussion: Recruitment to trials in critical situations raises important questions. Future studies should explore how rigorous governance arrangements for trials, particularly in critical situations, can protect participants rather than relying on ideals of informed consent that may be impossible to achieve. Future research should include a focus on interactions between research candidates and professionals involved in recruitment.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: Sara Kenyon was an investigator on the ORACLE trial.
Similar articles
- Pregnant womens' concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study.
Oude Rengerink K, Logtenberg S, Hooft L, Bossuyt PM, Mol BW. Oude Rengerink K, et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 4;15:207. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0641-x. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015. PMID: 26341516 Free PMC article. - Deciding to join a perinatal randomised controlled trial: experiences and views of pregnant women enroled in the Magpie Trial.
Smyth RM, Jacoby A, Elbourne D. Smyth RM, et al. Midwifery. 2012 Aug;28(4):E478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Sep 22. Midwifery. 2012. PMID: 21944570 - Recruiting and consenting into a peripartum trial in an emergency setting: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of women and healthcare professionals.
Lawton J, Snowdon C, Morrow S, Norman JE, Denison FC, Hallowell N. Lawton J, et al. Trials. 2016 Apr 11;17:195. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1323-3. Trials. 2016. PMID: 27066777 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Recruitment difficulties in obstetric trials: a case study and review.
Madan A, Tracy S, Reid R, Henry A. Madan A, et al. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Dec;54(6):546-52. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12233. Epub 2014 Oct 28. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014. PMID: 25350684 Review. - A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials.
Townsend D, Mills N, Savović J, Donovan JL. Townsend D, et al. Trials. 2015 Sep 28;16:432. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0908-6. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26416143 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble.
Carter P, Laurie GT, Dixon-Woods M. Carter P, et al. J Med Ethics. 2015 May;41(5):404-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102374. Epub 2015 Jan 23. J Med Ethics. 2015. PMID: 25617016 Free PMC article. - The role of social media in recruiting for clinical trials in pregnancy.
Shere M, Zhao XY, Koren G. Shere M, et al. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 26;9(3):e92744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092744. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24671210 Free PMC article. - A qualitative study of the factors influencing recruitment to a pilot trial on the prevention of striae gravidarum.
Brennan M, Clarke M, Devane D, Dowling M. Brennan M, et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2781-x. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020. PMID: 32050916 Free PMC article. - You are how you recruit: a cohort and randomized controlled trial of recruitment strategies.
Maghera A, Kahlke P, Lau A, Zeng Y, Hoskins C, Corbett T, Manca D, Lacaze-Masmonteil T, Hemmings D, Mandhane P. Maghera A, et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Sep 27;14:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-111. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014. PMID: 25260762 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Why do pregnant women participate in research? A patient participation investigation using Q-Methodology.
Meshaka R, Jeffares S, Sadrudin F, Huisman N, Saravanan P. Meshaka R, et al. Health Expect. 2017 Apr;20(2):188-197. doi: 10.1111/hex.12446. Epub 2016 Feb 26. Health Expect. 2017. PMID: 26918613 Free PMC article.
References
- American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Hundley V, Cheyne H. The trials and tribulations of intrapartum studies. Midwifery 20042027–36. - PubMed
- Medical Research Council Clinical trials for tomorrow: an MRC review of randomised controlled trials. London: Medical Research Council, 2003
- Featherstone K, Donovan J L. ‘Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it?' The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial. Soc Sci Med 200255709–719. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources