A prospective multi-center cohort study of acute non-displaced fractures of the scaphoid: operative versus non-operative treatment [NCT00205985] - PubMed (original) (raw)

Comparative Study

A prospective multi-center cohort study of acute non-displaced fractures of the scaphoid: operative versus non-operative treatment [NCT00205985]

Boris M Pfeiffer et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006.

Abstract

Background: Acute scaphoid fractures are common in active adults and do lead to reasonable time lost to work. One important goal of treatment is early return to work or sport. On this background, the adequate treatment of non-displaced acute scaphoid fractures is still under discussion. The aim of this study is to compare time to return to previous activity level comparing surgical versus non-surgical treatment of non-displaced acute scaphoid fractures.

Methods/design: The study is designed as a non-randomized multiple center cohort study including 12 sites in Germany and Austria. The inclusion period is planned to be 12 months with a follow up of 6 months. Allocation to operative or non-operative treatment is chosen by the patient together with his treating surgeon. The primary outcome is time to return to previous activity level adapted for loading of the wrist in daily life as measured by a newly developed questionnaire (PLDL-wrist). Factors identified a priori to be associated with the outcome, e.g., poverty status, age, education, smoking status, gender, and occupation, are measured to ensure adequate control for their potential confounding effects.

Discussion: The rationale and the design of a multiple center cohort study are presented. As it is not considered feasible to randomize patients in this study, potential confounding effects need to be controlled adequately.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00205985.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Number of publications of studies with RTW as outcome parameter. Pubmed-search from 1966 – 12/2003 using the search strategies: (1) [('return' OR 'day* lost' OR 'disability') AND 'work'] OR 'sick leave'; Limit: 'Clinical Trial' (2) {[('return' OR 'day* lost' OR 'disability') AND 'work'] OR 'sick leave'} AND 'Orthopaedic Procedures [mh]'. The abstracts of the retrieved publications were scanned to identify clinical studies using either 'return to work' or 'time of sick leave' as primary or secondary outcome. The found studies were categorised into one of the following 6 groups: 'Hand', 'Spine', 'Long Bone', 'Foot and Ankle', 'Knee' or 'Neck and Shoulder'.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Follow up procedures. At 6-weeks, 3-months and 6-months, the determination of the outcomes is done during in-house visits of the patients in the clinic. At 3-weeks, 9-weeks and 15-weeks, the QAS and PLDL-wrist questionnaires are retrieved via telephone interview.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dias JJ, Taylor M, Thompson J, Brenkel IJ, Gregg PJ. Radiographic signs of union of scaphoid fractures. An analysis of inter-observer agreement and reproducibility. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:299–301. - PubMed
    1. Duppe H, Johnell O, Lundborg G, Karlsson M, Redlund-Johnell I. Long-term results of fracture of the scaphoid. A follow-up study of more than thirty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:249–252. - PubMed
    1. Gelberman RH, Wolock BS, Siegel DB. Fractures and non-unions of the carpal scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:1560–1565. - PubMed
    1. Schädel-Höpfner M, Böhringer G, Gotzen L. [Percutaneous osteosynthesis of scaphoid fracture with the Herbert-Whipple screw – technique and results] Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2000;32:271–276. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-10935. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herbert TJ, Fisher WE. Management of the fractured scaphoid using a new bone screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66:114–123. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources