Geographic variation in the prescription of schedule II opioid analgesics among outpatients in the United States - PubMed (original) (raw)

Comparative Study

Geographic variation in the prescription of schedule II opioid analgesics among outpatients in the United States

Lesley H Curtis et al. Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun.

Erratum in

Abstract

Objective: To measure geographic variation in opioid use in a large, commercially insured, outpatient population in the United States.

Data sources: Outpatient prescription drug claims database of a national pharmaceutical benefit manager for 7,873,337 subjects with at least one prescription drug claim in 2000.

Study design: We measured the period prevalence of claims for opioid analgesics and controlled-release oxycodone at the state level. We measured geographic variation using the weighted coefficient of variation and systematic component of variation. In county-level multivariable regression, we explored associations between potential explanatory variables and claims for opioid analgesics and controlled-release oxycodone.

Principal findings: A total of 567,778 (64.2 per 1,000 total claims) were for oral opioid analgesics. Claim rates by state ranged from <20 to >100 claims per 1,000 total claims. States with long-standing prescription monitoring programs had among the lowest rates. In the county-level data, presence of a statewide prescription monitoring program and proportions of the population aged 15-24 and 65 years and older were independently and negatively associated with claim rates for all opioid analgesics. Surgeons per 1,000, proportion of the population reporting illicit drug use, and proportion who were female were independently and positively associated with claim rates for all opioid analgesics. Only the proportion of the population aged 25-34 and number of surgeons per 1,000 were independently and positively associated with claim rates for oxycodone.

Conclusions: Claim rates for opioid analgesics vary significantly by state. Presence of a statewide prescription monitoring program is associated with lower claim rates at the county level. Future research should use individual-level data to assess whether these findings reflect a reduction in abuse and diversion or suboptimal treatment of pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Claim Rates by State for All Opioid Analgesics and Controlled-Release Oxycodone The figure also displays the year in which state-based Schedule II prescription monitoring programs were first enacted in the states that have such a program.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Pain Society. Principles of Analgesic Use in the Treatment of Acute Pain and Cancer Pain. 4. Glenview, IL: American Pain Society; 1999.
    1. American Pain Society. Guideline for the Management of Pain in Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Juvenile Chronic Arthritis. Clinical Practice Guideline Number 2. Glenview, IL: American Pain Society; 2002.
    1. American Pain Society. Guideline for the Management of Cancer Pain in Adults and Children. Glenview, IL: American Pain Society; 2004.
    1. Clancy MA. “Down East High; Washington County Pill Addicts Have Health Officials Worried.”. Bangor Daily News. 2000 May 13.
    1. Clark DO, Von Korff M, Saunders K, Baluch WM, Simon GE. “A Chronic Disease Score with Empirically Derived Weights.”. Medical Care. 1995;33(8):783–95. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources