CT colonography: influence of 3D viewing and polyp candidate features on interpretation with computer-aided detection - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2006 Jun;239(3):768-76.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2393050418.
Pamela Schraedley-Desmond, Sandy Napel, Eric W Olcott, R Brooke Jeffrey Jr, Judy Yee, Michael E Zalis, Daniel Margolis, David S Paik, Anthony J Sherbondy, Padmavathi Sundaram, Christopher F Beaulieu
Affiliations
- PMID: 16714460
- DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2393050418
CT colonography: influence of 3D viewing and polyp candidate features on interpretation with computer-aided detection
Rong Shi et al. Radiology. 2006 Jun.
Abstract
Purpose: To retrospectively determine if three-dimensional (3D) viewing improves radiologists' accuracy in classifying true-positive (TP) and false-positive (FP) polyp candidates identified with computer-aided detection (CAD) and to determine candidate polyp features that are associated with classification accuracy, with known polyps serving as the reference standard.
Materials and methods: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained; this study was HIPAA compliant. Forty-seven computed tomographic (CT) colonography data sets were obtained in 26 men and 10 women (age range, 42-76 years). Four radiologists classified 705 polyp candidates (53 TP candidates, 652 FP candidates) identified with CAD; initially, only two-dimensional images were used, but these were later supplemented with 3D rendering. Another radiologist unblinded to colonoscopy findings characterized the features of each candidate, assessed colon distention and preparation, and defined the true nature of FP candidates. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare readers' performance, and repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to test features that affect interpretation.
Results: Use of 3D viewing improved classification accuracy for three readers and increased the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to 0.96-0.97 (P<.001). For TP candidates, maximum polyp width (P=.038), polyp height (P=.019), and preparation (P=.004) significantly affected accuracy. For FP candidates, colonic segment (P=.007), attenuation (P<.001), surface smoothness (P<.001), distention (P=.034), preparation (P<.001), and true nature of candidate lesions (P<.001) significantly affected accuracy.
Conclusion: Use of 3D viewing increases reader accuracy in the classification of polyp candidates identified with CAD. Polyp size and examination quality are significantly associated with accuracy.
Copyright (c) RSNA, 2006.
Similar articles
- Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
Taylor SA, Halligan S, Slater A, Goh V, Burling DN, Roddie ME, Honeyfield L, McQuillan J, Amin H, Dehmeshki J. Taylor SA, et al. Radiology. 2006 Jun;239(3):759-67. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2392050483. Epub 2006 Mar 16. Radiology. 2006. PMID: 16543593 - CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study.
Petrick N, Haider M, Summers RM, Yeshwant SC, Brown L, Iuliano EM, Louie A, Choi JR, Pickhardt PJ. Petrick N, et al. Radiology. 2008 Jan;246(1):148-56. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2453062161. Radiology. 2008. PMID: 18096536 - CT colonography and computer-aided detection: effect of false-positive results on reader specificity and reading efficiency in a low-prevalence screening population.
Taylor SA, Greenhalgh R, Ilangovan R, Tam E, Sahni VA, Burling D, Zhang J, Bassett P, Pickhardt PJ, Halligan S. Taylor SA, et al. Radiology. 2008 Apr;247(1):133-40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2471070816. Epub 2008 Feb 21. Radiology. 2008. PMID: 18292478 - CT colonography with computer-aided detection: recognizing the causes of false-positive reader results.
Trilisky I, Wroblewski K, Vannier MW, Horne JM, Dachman AH. Trilisky I, et al. Radiographics. 2014 Nov-Dec;34(7):1885-905. doi: 10.1148/rg.347130053. Radiographics. 2014. PMID: 25384290 Free PMC article. Review. - Computer-aided diagnosis for CT colonography.
Yoshida H, Dachman AH. Yoshida H, et al. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2004 Oct;25(5):419-31. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2004.07.002. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2004. PMID: 15559125 Review.
Cited by
- Biomedical imaging research: a fast-emerging area for interdisciplinary collaboration.
Sun Z, Ng KH, Ramli N. Sun Z, et al. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2011 Jul-Sep;7(3):e21. doi: 10.2349/biij.7.3.e21. Epub 2011 Jul 1. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2011. PMID: 22279498 Free PMC article. No abstract available. - Five levels of PACS modularity: integrating 3D and other advanced visualization tools.
Wang KC, Filice RW, Philbin JF, Siegel EL, Nagy PG. Wang KC, et al. J Digit Imaging. 2011 Dec;24(6):1096-102. doi: 10.1007/s10278-011-9366-1. J Digit Imaging. 2011. PMID: 21301923 Free PMC article. - Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial.
Dachman AH, Obuchowski NA, Hoffmeister JW, Hinshaw JL, Frew MI, Winter TC, Van Uitert RL, Periaswamy S, Summers RM, Hillman BJ. Dachman AH, et al. Radiology. 2010 Sep;256(3):827-35. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091890. Epub 2010 Jul 27. Radiology. 2010. PMID: 20663975 Free PMC article. - Improving the accuracy of CTC interpretation: computer-aided detection.
Summers RM. Summers RM. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010 Apr;20(2):245-57. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.02.004. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010. PMID: 20451814 Free PMC article. Review. - Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.
Giger ML, Chan HP, Boone J. Giger ML, et al. Med Phys. 2008 Dec;35(12):5799-820. doi: 10.1118/1.3013555. Med Phys. 2008. PMID: 19175137 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous