Transepidermal water loss reflects permeability barrier status: validation in human and rodent in vivo and ex vivo models - PubMed (original) (raw)
Transepidermal water loss reflects permeability barrier status: validation in human and rodent in vivo and ex vivo models
Joachim W Fluhr et al. Exp Dermatol. 2006 Jul.
Abstract
Permeability barrier function is measured with instruments that assess transepidermal water loss (TEWL), either with closed- or open-loop systems. Yet, the validity of TEWL as a measure of barrier status has been questioned recently. Hence, we tested the validity of this measure by comparing TEWL across a wide range of perturbations, with a variety of methods, and in a variety of models. TEWL rates with two closed-chamber systems (VapoMeter and H4300) and one closed-loop system (MEECO) under different experimental in vivo conditions were compared with data from four open-loop instruments, i.e. TM 210, TM 300, DermaLab and EP 1. The instruments were compared in vivo both in humans and hairless mice skin subjected to different degrees of acute barrier disruption. The values obtained with bioengineering systems were correlated with absolute water loss rates, determined gravimetrically. Measurements with both closed and open systems correlated not only with each other, but each method detected different degrees of barrier dysfunction. Although all instruments differentiated among gradations in TEWL in the mid-range of barrier disruption in vivo, differences in very low and very high levels of disruption were less accurately measured with the H4300 and DermaLab systems. Nevertheless, a high Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was calculated for data from all instruments vs. gravimetrically assessed TEWL. Together, these results verify the utility of TEWL as a measure of permeability barrier status. Moreover, all tested instruments are reliable tools for the assessment of variations in permeability barrier function.
Similar articles
- Validation of the VapoMeter, a closed unventilated chamber system to assess transepidermal water loss vs. the open chamber Tewameter.
De Paepe K, Houben E, Adam R, Wiesemann F, Rogiers V. De Paepe K, et al. Skin Res Technol. 2005 Feb;11(1):61-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2005.00101.x. Skin Res Technol. 2005. PMID: 15691261 Clinical Trial. - A portable device using a closed chamber system for measuring transepidermal water loss: comparison with the conventional method.
Tagami H, Kobayashi H, Kikuchi K. Tagami H, et al. Skin Res Technol. 2002 Feb;8(1):7-12. Skin Res Technol. 2002. PMID: 12005122 Clinical Trial. - Measuring transepidermal water loss: a comparative in vivo study of condenser-chamber, unventilated-chamber and open-chamber systems.
Farahmand S, Tien L, Hui X, Maibach HI. Farahmand S, et al. Skin Res Technol. 2009 Nov;15(4):392-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2009.00376.x. Skin Res Technol. 2009. PMID: 19832948 Clinical Trial. - Transepidermal water loss and skin surface hydration in the non invasive assessment of stratum corneum function.
Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Berardesca E, et al. Derm Beruf Umwelt. 1990 Mar-Apr;38(2):50-3. Derm Beruf Umwelt. 1990. PMID: 2187664 Review. - The correlation between transepidermal water loss and percutaneous absorption: an overview.
Levin J, Maibach H. Levin J, et al. J Control Release. 2005 Mar 21;103(2):291-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.11.035. Epub 2005 Jan 19. J Control Release. 2005. PMID: 15763614 Review.
Cited by
- Staphylococcus aureus colonizing the skin microbiota of adults with severe atopic dermatitis exhibits genomic diversity and convergence in biofilm traits.
Sivori F, Cavallo I, Truglio M, De Maio F, Sanguinetti M, Fabrizio G, Licursi V, Francalancia M, Fraticelli F, La Greca I, Lucantoni F, Camera E, Mariano M, Ascenzioni F, Cristaudo A, Pimpinelli F, Di Domenico EG. Sivori F, et al. Biofilm. 2024 Sep 19;8:100222. doi: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2024.100222. eCollection 2024 Dec. Biofilm. 2024. PMID: 39381779 Free PMC article. - Skin Predictive Biomarkers for the Development of Atopic Dermatitis and Food Allergy in Infants.
Kim J, Kim BE, Ahn K, Leung DYM. Kim J, et al. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2024 Jul;16(4):323-337. doi: 10.4168/aair.2024.16.4.323. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2024. PMID: 39155734 Free PMC article. Review. - An exploratory study of structural and microvascular changes in the skin following electrical shaving using optical coherence topography.
Chaturvedi P, Kroon W, Zanelli G, Worsley PR. Chaturvedi P, et al. Skin Res Technol. 2024 Jul;30(7):e13830. doi: 10.1111/srt.13830. Skin Res Technol. 2024. PMID: 38951871 Free PMC article. - Skin Barrier Function Assessment: Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Is Less Influenced by Daily Routine Activities Than Transepidermal Water Loss.
Huygen L, Thys PM, Wollenberg A, Gutermuth J, Krohn IK. Huygen L, et al. Ann Dermatol. 2024 Apr;36(2):99-111. doi: 10.5021/ad.23.052. Ann Dermatol. 2024. PMID: 38576248 Free PMC article. - Evaluating the Irritant Factors of Silicone and Hydrocolloid Skin Contact Adhesives Using Trans-Epidermal Water Loss, Protein Stripping, Erythema, and Ease of Removal.
Dyson E, Sikkink S, Nocita D, Twigg P, Westgate G, Swift T. Dyson E, et al. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2024 Jan 15;7(1):284-296. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.3c00874. Epub 2023 Dec 27. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2024. PMID: 38150300 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources