Genetic reclassification of histologic grade delineates new clinical subtypes of breast cancer - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2006 Nov 1;66(21):10292-301.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4414.
Joshy George, Oleg Senko, Benjamin Mow, Thomas C Putti, Johanna Smeds, Thomas Lindahl, Yudi Pawitan, Per Hall, Hans Nordgren, John E L Wong, Edison T Liu, Jonas Bergh, Vladimir A Kuznetsov, Lance D Miller
Affiliations
- PMID: 17079448
- DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4414
Free article
Genetic reclassification of histologic grade delineates new clinical subtypes of breast cancer
Anna V Ivshina et al. Cancer Res. 2006.
Free article
Abstract
Histologic grading of breast cancer defines morphologic subtypes informative of metastatic potential, although not without considerable interobserver disagreement and clinical heterogeneity particularly among the moderately differentiated grade 2 (G2) tumors. We posited that a gene expression signature capable of discerning tumors of grade 1 (G1) and grade 3 (G3) histology might provide a more objective measure of grade with prognostic benefit for patients with G2 disease. To this end, we studied the expression profiles of 347 primary invasive breast tumors analyzed on Affymetrix microarrays. Using class prediction algorithms, we identified 264 robust grade-associated markers, six of which could accurately classify G1 and G3 tumors, and separate G2 tumors into two highly discriminant classes (termed G2a and G2b genetic grades) with patient survival outcomes highly similar to those with G1 and G3 histology, respectively. Statistical analysis of conventional clinical variables further distinguished G2a and G2b subtypes from each other, but also from histologic G1 and G3 tumors. In multivariate analyses, genetic grade was consistently found to be an independent prognostic indicator of disease recurrence comparable with that of lymph node status and tumor size. When incorporated into the Nottingham prognostic index, genetic grade enhanced detection of patients with less harmful tumors, likely to benefit little from adjuvant therapy. Our findings show that a genetic grade signature can improve prognosis and therapeutic planning for breast cancer patients, and support the view that low- and high-grade disease, as defined genetically, reflect independent pathobiological entities rather than a continuum of cancer progression.
Similar articles
- Histological grade provides significant prognostic information in addition to breast cancer subtypes defined according to St Gallen 2013.
Ehinger A, Malmström P, Bendahl PO, Elston CW, Falck AK, Forsare C, Grabau D, Rydén L, Stål O, Fernö M; South and South-East Swedish Breast Cancer Groups. Ehinger A, et al. Acta Oncol. 2017 Jan;56(1):68-74. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1237778. Epub 2016 Oct 20. Acta Oncol. 2017. PMID: 27762648 Clinical Trial. - Predictive factors associated with axillary lymph node metastases in T1a and T1b breast carcinomas: analysis in more than 900 patients.
Rivadeneira DE, Simmons RM, Christos PJ, Hanna K, Daly JM, Osborne MP. Rivadeneira DE, et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Jul;191(1):1-6; discussion 6-8. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00310-0. J Am Coll Surg. 2000. PMID: 10898177 - Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis.
Sotiriou C, Wirapati P, Loi S, Harris A, Fox S, Smeds J, Nordgren H, Farmer P, Praz V, Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Larsimont D, Cardoso F, Peterse H, Nuyten D, Buyse M, Van de Vijver MJ, Bergh J, Piccart M, Delorenzi M. Sotiriou C, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Feb 15;98(4):262-72. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj052. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006. PMID: 16478745 - Breast Cancer Tissue Markers, Genomic Profiling, and Other Prognostic Factors: A Primer for Radiologists.
Tirada N, Aujero M, Khorjekar G, Richards S, Chopra J, Dromi S, Ioffe O. Tirada N, et al. Radiographics. 2018 Nov-Dec;38(7):1902-1920. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180047. Epub 2018 Oct 12. Radiographics. 2018. PMID: 30312139 Review. - Overview of resistance to systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer.
Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Morales-Vasquez F, Hortobagyi GN. Gonzalez-Angulo AM, et al. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;608:1-22. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-74039-3_1. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007. PMID: 17993229 Review.
Cited by
- The lncRNA landscape of breast cancer reveals a role for DSCAM-AS1 in breast cancer progression.
Niknafs YS, Han S, Ma T, Speers C, Zhang C, Wilder-Romans K, Iyer MK, Pitchiaya S, Malik R, Hosono Y, Prensner JR, Poliakov A, Singhal U, Xiao L, Kregel S, Siebenaler RF, Zhao SG, Uhl M, Gawronski A, Hayes DF, Pierce LJ, Cao X, Collins C, Backofen R, Sahinalp CS, Rae JM, Chinnaiyan AM, Feng FY. Niknafs YS, et al. Nat Commun. 2016 Sep 26;7:12791. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12791. Nat Commun. 2016. PMID: 27666543 Free PMC article. - Identification of Breast Cancer Prognosis Markers via Integrative Analysis.
Ma S, Dai Y, Huang J, Xie Y. Ma S, et al. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2012 Sep 1;56(9):2718-2728. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.02.017. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2012. PMID: 22773869 Free PMC article. - A measure of the signal-to-noise ratio of microarray samples and studies using gene correlations.
Venet D, Detours V, Bersini H. Venet D, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051013. Epub 2012 Dec 12. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23251415 Free PMC article. - Crk adaptor proteins act as key signaling integrators for breast tumorigenesis.
Fathers KE, Bell ES, Rajadurai CV, Cory S, Zhao H, Mourskaia A, Zuo D, Madore J, Monast A, Mes-Masson AM, Grosset AA, Gaboury L, Hallet M, Siegel P, Park M. Fathers KE, et al. Breast Cancer Res. 2012 May 8;14(3):R74. doi: 10.1186/bcr3183. Breast Cancer Res. 2012. PMID: 22569336 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases