Isolation and genetic diversity of endangered grey nurse shark (Carcharias taurus) populations - PubMed (original) (raw)

Isolation and genetic diversity of endangered grey nurse shark (Carcharias taurus) populations

Adam Stow et al. Biol Lett. 2006.

Abstract

Anthropogenic impacts are believed to be the primary threats to the eastern Australian population of grey nurse sharks (Carcharias taurus), which is listed as critically endangered, and the most threatened population globally. Analyses of 235 polymorphic amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) loci and 700 base pairs of mitochondrial DNA control region provide the first account of genetic variation and geographical partitioning (east and west coasts of Australia, South Africa) in C. taurus. Assignment tests, analysis of relatedness and Fst values all indicate that the Australian populations are isolated from South Africa, with negligible migration between the east and west Australian coasts. There are significant differences in levels of genetic variation among regions. Australian C. taurus, particularly the eastern population, has significantly less AFLP variation than the other sampling localities. Further, the eastern Australian sharks possess only a single mitochondrial haplotype, also suggesting a small number of founding individuals. Therefore, historical, rather than anthropogenic processes most likely account for their depauperate genetic variation. These findings have implications for the viability of the eastern Australian population of grey nurse sharks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Distribution of C. taurus (marked black), showing sampling locations (marked with star). Number of individuals sampled at each location from Australian and South African waters (table 1) are arranged in a north–south order.

Figure 2

Figure 2

A neighbourhood joining tree of genetic distance (1−r), clustering individuals sampled from east and west Australia (filled circles and filled squares, respectively) and South Africa (open circles). Note the longer branch lengths (i.e. greater genetic divergence) in the South African samples.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baum J.K, Myers R.A, Kehler D.G, Worm B, Harley S.J, Doherty P.A. Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the northwest Atlantic. Science. 2003;299:389–392. doi:10.1126/science.1079777 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cavanagh, R. D., Kyne, P. M., Fowler, S. L., Musick, J. A., & Bennett, M. B. 2003 The conservation status of Australian chondrichthyans: report of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group Australia and Oceania Regional Red List Workshop, University of Queensland, Brisbane, p. 170.
    1. Compagno, L. J. V. 1984 Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Part 1. Hexanchiformes to Lamniformes Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations Species Catalogue, vol. 5. Fisheries Synopsis 125, vol. 4, pp. 1–249. Rome, Italy: FAO.
    1. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 2005;14:74–75. - PubMed
    1. Fay J, Wu C. A human population bottleneck can account for the discordance between patterns of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA variation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999;16:1003–1005. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources