Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives

Richard P T M Grol et al. Milbank Q. 2007.

Abstract

A consistent finding in articles on quality improvement in health care is that change is difficult to achieve. According to the research literature, the majority of interventions are targeted at health care professionals. But success in achieving change may be influenced by factors other than those relating to individual professionals, and theories may help explain whether change is possible. This article argues for a more systematic use of theories in planning and evaluating quality-improvement interventions in clinical practice. It demonstrates how different theories can be used to generate testable hypotheses regarding factors that influence the implementation of change, and it shows how different theoretical assumptions lead to different quality-improvement strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ajzen I. Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour. Milton Keynes, U.K.: Open University Press; 1988.
    1. Ajzen I. The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50:179–211.
    1. Allen P, Croxson B, Roberts JA, Archibald K, Crawshaw S, Taylor L. The Use of Contracts in the Management of Infectious Disease Related Risk in the NHS Internal Market. Health Policy. 2002;59:257–81. - PubMed
    1. Argyris C, Schön D. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley; 1978.
    1. Armour BS, Pitts MM, Maclean R, Cangialose C, Kishel M, Imai H, Etchason J. The Effect of Explicit Financial Incentives on Physician Behavior. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2001;161(10):1261–66. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources