Attitudes towards clinical research among cancer trial participants and non-participants: an interview study using a Grounded Theory approach - PubMed (original) (raw)
Attitudes towards clinical research among cancer trial participants and non-participants: an interview study using a Grounded Theory approach
S M Madsen et al. J Med Ethics. 2007 Apr.
Abstract
The attitudes of women patients with cancer were explored when they were invited to participate in one of three randomised trials that included chemotherapy at two university centres and a satellite centre. Fourteen patients participating in and 15 patients declining trials were interviewed. Analysis was based on the constant comparative method. Most patients voiced positive attitudes towards clinical research, believing that trials are necessary for further medical development, and most spontaneously argued that participation is a moral obligation. Most trial decliners, however, described a radical change in focus as they faced the actual personal choice. Almost no one got an impression of clinical equipoise between treatments in the trials, and most patients expressed discomfort with randomisation. A patient's choice to participate was mainly determined by whether the primary focus was on treatment effect or on adverse effects. Both knowledge about and feelings towards trials originated mostly from the media, although paradoxically the media were largely seen as untrustworthy. Mistrust was shown towards the pharmaceutical industry, and although most patients originally trusted that doctors primarily pursued the interest of patients, they did not trust the adequacy of doctors or industry in maintaining self-regulation. Thus, public control measures were judged to be essential.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None.
Similar articles
- Participants' perceptions of motivation, randomisation and withdrawal in a randomised controlled trial of interventions for prevention of depression.
Grant JB, Mackinnon AJ, Christensen H, Walker J. Grant JB, et al. J Med Ethics. 2009 Dec;35(12):768-73. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.028035. J Med Ethics. 2009. PMID: 19948934 - [An index of understanding randomised clinical trials in oncology].
Leroy T, Christophe V, Penel N, Antoine P, Vanlemmens L, Reich M, Clisant S. Leroy T, et al. Bull Cancer. 2009 Jun;96(6):741-50. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2009.0888. Bull Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19467958 French. - Attitudes towards clinical research amongst participants and nonparticipants.
Madsen SM, Mirza MR, Holm S, Hilsted KL, Kampmann K, Riis P. Madsen SM, et al. J Intern Med. 2002 Feb;251(2):156-68. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.00949.x. J Intern Med. 2002. PMID: 11905591 - Attitudes toward research participation and investigator conflicts of interest among advanced cancer patients participating in early phase clinical trials.
Gray SW, Hlubocky FJ, Ratain MJ, Daugherty CK. Gray SW, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 10;25(23):3488-94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.7283. J Clin Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17687154 - Public attitudes regarding willingness to participate in medical research studies.
Trauth JM, Musa D, Siminoff L, Jewell IK, Ricci E. Trauth JM, et al. J Health Soc Policy. 2000;12(2):23-43. doi: 10.1300/J045v12n02_02. J Health Soc Policy. 2000. PMID: 11184441
Cited by
- A comparison of patient knowledge of clinical trials and trialist priorities.
Cameron P, Pond GR, Xu RY, Ellis PM, Goffin JR. Cameron P, et al. Curr Oncol. 2013 Jun;20(3):e193-205. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1323. Curr Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23737689 Free PMC article. - Exploring Willingness of Elder Chinese in Houston to Participate in Clinical Research.
Thornton LR, Amorrortu RP, Smith DW, Mainous AG 3rd, Vernon SW, Tilley BC. Thornton LR, et al. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Dec 15;4:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 24. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016. PMID: 27458608 Free PMC article. - The relationships among knowledge, self-efficacy, preparedness, decisional conflict, and decisions to participate in a cancer clinical trial.
Miller SM, Hudson SV, Egleston BL, Manne S, Buzaglo JS, Devarajan K, Fleisher L, Millard J, Solarino N, Trinastic J, Meropol NJ. Miller SM, et al. Psychooncology. 2013 Mar;22(3):481-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.3043. Epub 2012 Feb 14. Psychooncology. 2013. PMID: 22331643 Free PMC article. - Knowledge, attitude, and perception of public about participation in COVID-19 clinical trials: a study from Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
Elshammaa K, Hamza N, Elkholy E, Mahrous A, Elnaem M, Elrggal M. Elshammaa K, et al. Saudi Pharm J. 2022 Jan 19;30(3):283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2022.01.008. Online ahead of print. Saudi Pharm J. 2022. PMID: 35103043 Free PMC article. - The face of equipoise--delivering a structured education programme within a randomized controlled trial: qualitative study.
Eborall HC, Dallosso HM, Daly H, Martin-Stacey L, Heller SR. Eborall HC, et al. Trials. 2014 Jan 9;15:15. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-15. Trials. 2014. PMID: 24405854 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
- Madsen S M, Holm S, Riis P. Ethical aspects of clinical trials: the attitudes of the public and out‐patients. J Intern Med 1999245571–579. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources