Variability in individual responsiveness to clopidogrel: clinical implications, management, and future perspectives - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
. 2007 Apr 10;49(14):1505-16.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.11.044. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
Affiliations
- PMID: 17418288
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.11.044
Free article
Review
Variability in individual responsiveness to clopidogrel: clinical implications, management, and future perspectives
Dominick J Angiolillo et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007.
Free article
Abstract
Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Clopidogrel, in combination with aspirin, is currently the antiplatelet treatment of choice for prevention of stent thrombosis, and clinical trials have shown that, in high-risk patients, prolonged dual antiplatelet treatment is more effective than aspirin alone in preventing major cardiovascular events. However, despite the use of clopidogrel, a considerable number of patients continue to have cardiovascular events. Numerous in vitro studies have shown that individual responsiveness to clopidogrel is not uniform in all patients and is subject to inter- and intraindividual variability. Notably, there is a growing degree of evidence that recurrence of ischemic complications may be attributed to poor response to clopidogrel. The mechanisms leading to poor clopidogrel effects are not fully elucidated and are likely multifactorial. Although the gold standard definition to assess antiplatelet drug response has not been fully established, there is sufficient evidence to support that persistence of enhanced platelet reactivity despite the use of clopidogrel is a clinically relevant entity. This paper reviews the impact of individual response variability to clopidogrel on clinical outcomes and current and future directions for its management.
Similar articles
- Assessment, mechanisms, and clinical implication of variability in platelet response to aspirin and clopidogrel therapy.
Ben-Dor I, Kleiman NS, Lev E. Ben-Dor I, et al. Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jul 15;104(2):227-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.022. Epub 2009 May 13. Am J Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19576352 Review. - Platelet reactivity and nonresponse to dual antiplatelet therapy: a review.
Vila PM, Zafar MU, Badimon JJ. Vila PM, et al. Platelets. 2009 Dec;20(8):531-8. doi: 10.3109/09537100903261379. Platelets. 2009. PMID: 19845440 Review. - Evaluation of clopidogrel responsiveness after drug-eluting stent implantation.
Price MJ. Price MJ. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2009 Oct;57(5):657-66. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2009. PMID: 19838155 - The future of platelet function testing to guide therapy in clopidogrel low and enhanced responders.
Bernlochner I, Byrne RA, Kastrati A, Sibbing D. Bernlochner I, et al. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2011 Aug;9(8):999-1014. doi: 10.1586/erc.11.80. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2011. PMID: 21878045 Review. - Antiplatelet drug response variability and the role of platelet function testing: a practical guide for interventional cardiologists.
Angiolillo DJ, Suryadevara S, Capranzano P, Zenni MZ, Guzman LA, Bass TA. Angiolillo DJ, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan 1;73(1):1-14. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21782. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. PMID: 19089929 Review.
Cited by
- Adjunctive cilostazol versus high maintenance dose of clopidogrel in patients with hyporesponsiveness to chronic clopidogrel therapy.
Lee GY, Hahn JY, Lee SY, Kim HJ, Kim JH, Lee SY, Song YB, Choi SH, Choi JH, Gwon HC. Lee GY, et al. Yonsei Med J. 2013 Jan 1;54(1):34-40. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.1.34. Yonsei Med J. 2013. PMID: 23225796 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Zhou X, Angiolillo DJ, Ortega-Paz L. Zhou X, et al. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Oct 6;9(10):340. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9100340. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022. PMID: 36286292 Free PMC article. Review. - Mean platelet volume as a predictor for long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Eisen A, Bental T, Assali A, Kornowski R, Lev EI. Eisen A, et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2013 Nov;36(4):469-74. doi: 10.1007/s11239-013-0876-1. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2013. PMID: 23345043 Clinical Trial. - The developmental journey of therapies targeting purine receptors: from basic science to clinical trials.
Han S, Suzuki-Kerr H, Vlajkovic SM, Thorne PR. Han S, et al. Purinergic Signal. 2022 Dec;18(4):435-450. doi: 10.1007/s11302-022-09896-w. Epub 2022 Sep 29. Purinergic Signal. 2022. PMID: 36173587 Free PMC article. Review. - Current Status and Future Direction of Antithrombotic Therapy for Patients with STEMI Undergoing Primary PCI.
Vogel RF, Delewi R, Badimon L, Angiolillo DJ, Vlachojannis GJ. Vogel RF, et al. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 5;23(9):297. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2309297. eCollection 2022 Sep. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 39077705 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical