Responsible oversight of human stem cell research: the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine's medical and ethical standards - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Responsible oversight of human stem cell research: the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine's medical and ethical standards

Geoffrey P Lomax et al. PLoS Med. 2007 May.

Abstract

California voters recently approved $3 billion over 10 years for public funding of stem cell research through the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM). Geoffrey Lomax and colleagues discuss the principles that guided the CIRM regulations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: BL chairs the Stem Cell Research Oversight Committee at the University of California San Francisco.

Figures

None

CIRM developed comprehensive medical and ethical standards for stem cell research through a process involving extensive expert and public consultation.

(Credit: The Burnham Institute & CIRM)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Academy of Sciences. Ethical considerations for research on housing-related health hazards involving children. Washington (D. C.): National Academy Press; 2005.
    1. Dawson L, Bateman-House AS, Mueller Agnew D, Bok H, Brock DW, et al. Safety issues in cell-based intervention trials. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:1077–1085. - PubMed
    1. Lo B, Chou V, Cedars M, Gates E, Taylor R, et al. Consent from donors for embryo and stem cell research. Science. 2003;301:921. - PubMed
    1. Greene M, Schill K, Takahashi S, Bateman-House A, Beauchamp T, et al. Ethics: Moral issues of human-non-human primate neural grafting. Science. 2005;309:385–386. - PubMed
    1. Magnus D, Cho MK. Issues in oocyte donation for stem cell research. Science. 2005;308:1747–1748. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources