The immortal strand hypothesis: segregation and reconstruction - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
. 2007 Jun 29;129(7):1239-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.019.
Affiliations
- PMID: 17604710
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.019
Free article
Review
The immortal strand hypothesis: segregation and reconstruction
Thomas A Rando. Cell. 2007.
Free article
Abstract
The immortal strand hypothesis posits that the propensity of stem cell compartments to give rise to cancer in later life can be minimized if stem cells, during the process of self-renewal, retain those DNA strands with the fewest mutations acquired during DNA replication. In this Essay, I explore evidence in support of the hypothesis, the biological implications, and the key questions that remain to be answered experimentally to address the fundamental tenets of the hypothesis.
Similar articles
- Immortal strands? Give me a break.
Lansdorp PM. Lansdorp PM. Cell. 2007 Jun 29;129(7):1244-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.017. Cell. 2007. PMID: 17604711 Review. - Evolutionary dynamics of adult stem cells: comparison of random and immortal-strand segregation mechanisms.
Tannenbaum E, Sherley JL, Shakhnovich EI. Tannenbaum E, et al. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005 Apr;71(4 Pt 1):041914. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.041914. Epub 2005 Apr 27. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005. PMID: 15903708 - Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands.
Potten CS, Owen G, Booth D. Potten CS, et al. J Cell Sci. 2002 Jun 1;115(Pt 11):2381-8. doi: 10.1242/jcs.115.11.2381. J Cell Sci. 2002. PMID: 12006622 - [Immortal DNA or epigenetic signature ?].
Rocheteau P, Tajbakhsh S. Rocheteau P, et al. Med Sci (Paris). 2008 Oct;24(10):847-52. doi: 10.1051/medsci/20082410847. Med Sci (Paris). 2008. PMID: 18950581 Review. French. - Immortal DNA strand cosegregation requires p53/IMPDH-dependent asymmetric self-renewal associated with adult stem cells.
Rambhatla L, Ram-Mohan S, Cheng JJ, Sherley JL. Rambhatla L, et al. Cancer Res. 2005 Apr 15;65(8):3155-61. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3161. Cancer Res. 2005. PMID: 15833845
Cited by
- Chromatin remodeling in tissue stem cell fate determination.
Li X, Zhu G, Zhao B. Li X, et al. Cell Regen. 2024 Sep 30;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13619-024-00203-z. Cell Regen. 2024. PMID: 39348027 Free PMC article. Review. - Asymmetric division of stem cells and its cancer relevance.
Chao S, Yan H, Bu P. Chao S, et al. Cell Regen. 2024 Feb 27;13(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13619-024-00188-9. Cell Regen. 2024. PMID: 38411768 Free PMC article. Review. - Nonrandom sister chromatid segregation mediates rDNA copy number maintenance in Drosophila.
Watase GJ, Nelson JO, Yamashita YM. Watase GJ, et al. Sci Adv. 2022 Jul 29;8(30):eabo4443. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo4443. Epub 2022 Jul 27. Sci Adv. 2022. PMID: 35895823 Free PMC article. - Mitotic drive in asymmetric epigenetic inheritance.
Ranjan R, Chen X. Ranjan R, et al. Biochem Soc Trans. 2022 Apr 29;50(2):675-688. doi: 10.1042/BST20200267. Biochem Soc Trans. 2022. PMID: 35437581 Free PMC article. - Implication of the Strand-Specific Imprinting and Segregation Model: Integrating in utero Hormone Exposure, Stem Cell and Lateral Asymmetry Hypotheses in Breast Cancer Aetiology.
Harbinder S, Lazzara CA, Klar AJ. Harbinder S, et al. Hereditary Genet. 2013;2013(Suppl 2):005. doi: 10.4172/2161-1041.s2-005. Epub 2013 Aug 13. Hereditary Genet. 2013. PMID: 34589269 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical