Protein roadblocks and helix discontinuities are barriers to the initiation of mismatch repair - PubMed (original) (raw)
Protein roadblocks and helix discontinuities are barriers to the initiation of mismatch repair
Anna Pluciennik et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007.
Abstract
The hemimethylated d(GATC) sequence that directs Escherichia coli mismatch repair can reside on either side of a mismatch at a separation distance of 1,000 bp or more. Initiation of repair involves the mismatch-, MutS-, and MutL-dependent activation of MutH endonuclease, which incises the unmethylated strand at the d(GATC) sequence, with the ensuing strand break serving as the loading site for the appropriate 3'-to-5' or 5'-to-3' excision system. However, the mechanism responsible for the coordinated recognition of the mismatch and a hemimodified d(GATC) site is uncertain. We show that a protein roadblock (EcoRI(E111Q), a hydrolytically defective form of EcoRI endonuclease) placed on the helix between the two DNA sites inhibits MutH activation by 70-80% and that events that escape inhibition are attributable, at least in part, to diffusion of EcoRI(E111Q) away from its recognition site. We also demonstrate that a double-strand break located within the shorter path linking the mismatch and a d(GATC) site in a circular heteroduplex abolishes MutH activation, whereas a double-strand break within the longer path is without effect. These findings support the idea that initiation of mismatch repair involves signaling along the helix contour.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement: P.M. serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of Codon Devices; however, this paper is completely unrelated to his role in the company.
Figures
Fig. 1.
Experimental system. (A) Heteroduplex DNAs contained a G·T mismatch, a single hemimodified d(GATC) site 1,024 bp from the mismatch, and EcoRI recognition sites at either, both, or neither of the positions indicated (see Fig. 3). One EcoRI site was located 309 bp from the mismatch, between the mispair and d(GATC) site (shorter path), and the second was located 145 bp to the other side of the mispair. Heteroduplexes also contained an NheI site 5 bp from the mismatch, which is rendered resistant to cleavage when MutS is bound to the mispair (12). Because the efficiency of MutH activation by MutS and MutL can be affected by superhelical density (9), circular substrates were linearized with ClaI before use to avoid experimental variability caused by possible differences in this parameter with different heteroduplex preparations. (B) ClaI linearized G·T heteroduplex (2.4 nM; two EcoRI sites) prebound with EcoRIE111Q (12 nM) was challenged with 120 nM WT EcoRI endonuclease, and the reaction was sampled to score the remaining intact DNA (circles) (see Materials and Methods). Error bars are ±1 SD (three determinations). The curve shown was determined by nonlinear least-squares fit to a single exponential (amplitude, 2.36 nM; k = 0.0311 min−1; _R_2 = 0.991). Because the heteroduplex contained two EcoRI sites, the rate of cleavage per site is half of that shown. (No preferential cleavage of either site was observed.) The two-EcoRI-site heteroduplex also was challenged with 120 nM EcoRI in the absence of EcoRIE111Q; the intact heteroduplex was not detectable after 30 s of reaction, but low levels of molecules that cleaved at just one site or the other were observed (squares). (C) Reactions containing 2.4 nM G·T heteroduplex with two EcoRI sites (prebound as indicated with 24 nM EcoRIE111Q) were supplemented with 0, 12.5, 25, 50, or 100 nM MutS as the monomer. After 15 min at 37°C, samples of the reactions were challenged with NheI for 1 min. The challenge of samples from the same reaction with WT EcoRI demonstrated that >95% of EcoRI sites were occupied by EcoRIE111Q (data not shown).
Fig. 2.
EcoRIE111Q inhibits MutH activation on a linear G·T substrate. (A) Covalently closed circular 5′ G·T heteroduplex or A·T homoduplex DNAs containing two EcoRI sites were linearized with ClaI (Fig. 1_A_), prebound with EcoRIE111Q as indicated, and then incubated with MutH, MuL, MutS, and ATP (see Materials and Methods). Reactions were sampled as a function of time and were quenched, and products were resolved by electrophoresis through alkaline agarose and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The substrate and product were visualized by hybridization with an excess of the 32P-5′-end-labeled oligonucleotide V2505 (see schematic at right), which hybridizes to the unmethylated strand. The 2,313-nucleotide segment resulting from d(GATC) incision was quantitated by using a phosphorimager. Filled circles, G·T heteroduplex in the absence of EcoRIE111Q (mock prebound); open circles, G·T heteroduplex prebound with EcoRIE111Q; squares, A·T homoduplex prebound with EcoRIE111Q. Error bars are ±1 SD (three determinations). (B) Experimental procedure and symbols are as in A, but DNA substrates were 3′ G·T heteroduplex or A·T homoduplex DNAs. Incision at the d(GATC) site was scored by hybridization with 32P-5′-end-labeled oligonucleotide C2527, which hybridizes to the unmethylated strand.
Fig. 3.
EcoRIE111Q inhibition of MutH activation depends on EcoRI site location. (A) MutHLS reactions on 3′ G·T heteroduplex DNAs. The descriptions of the symbols are the same as for those in Fig. 2_B_, except that DNAs contained one or no EcoRI site, as indicated. The individual EcoRI sites present in the molecules shown in A and B correspond to the two sites present in the DNAs shown in Fig. 2. The error bars indicate the SD for three independent experiments (A) or the range of values observed in two independent experiments (B and C).
Fig. 4.
Effects of a helix discontinuity on MutH activation. (A) Closed circular 3′ G·T heteroduplexes were linearized with individual endonucleases as indicated and then subjected to treatment with MutH, MutL, and MutS as described in Fig. 2. d(GATC) incision was scored after digestion with ClaI by hybridization with 32P-5′-end-labeled oligonucleotide C2527 (oligonucleotide C2552 for the BspHI-linearized heteroduplex). The region encompassing the shorter path between the mismatch and the d(GATC) site in the circular heteroduplex is shown in bold. (B) The analysis of d(GATC) incision after restriction enzyme linearization was as in A, except that 5′ heteroduplexes were used.
Comment in
- Coupling distant sites in DNA during DNA mismatch repair.
Kolodner RD, Mendillo ML, Putnam CD. Kolodner RD, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 7;104(32):12953-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705698104. Epub 2007 Jul 30. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007. PMID: 17664420 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
- The unstructured linker arms of MutL enable GATC site incision beyond roadblocks during initiation of DNA mismatch repair.
Mardenborough YSN, Nitsenko K, Laffeber C, Duboc C, Sahin E, Quessada-Vial A, Winterwerp HHK, Sixma TK, Kanaar R, Friedhoff P, Strick TR, Lebbink JHG. Mardenborough YSN, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Dec 16;47(22):11667-11680. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz834. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019. PMID: 31598722 Free PMC article. - Initiation of methyl-directed mismatch repair.
Au KG, Welsh K, Modrich P. Au KG, et al. J Biol Chem. 1992 Jun 15;267(17):12142-8. J Biol Chem. 1992. PMID: 1601880 - Methyl-directed mismatch repair is bidirectional.
Cooper DL, Lahue RS, Modrich P. Cooper DL, et al. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jun 5;268(16):11823-9. J Biol Chem. 1993. PMID: 8389365 - The functions of MutL in mismatch repair: the power of multitasking.
Guarné A. Guarné A. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2012;110:41-70. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387665-2.00003-1. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2012. PMID: 22749142 Review. - How the EcoRI endonuclease recognizes and cleaves DNA.
Heitman J. Heitman J. Bioessays. 1992 Jul;14(7):445-54. doi: 10.1002/bies.950140704. Bioessays. 1992. PMID: 1445286 Review.
Cited by
- A programmable DNA roadblock system using dCas9 and multivalent target sites.
Matozel EK, Parziale S, Price AC. Matozel EK, et al. PLoS One. 2022 May 6;17(5):e0268099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268099. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35522691 Free PMC article. - Mismatch Repair: From Preserving Genome Stability to Enabling Mutation Studies in Real-Time Single Cells.
Elez M. Elez M. Cells. 2021 Jun 18;10(6):1535. doi: 10.3390/cells10061535. Cells. 2021. PMID: 34207040 Free PMC article. Review. - The unstructured linker arms of MutL enable GATC site incision beyond roadblocks during initiation of DNA mismatch repair.
Mardenborough YSN, Nitsenko K, Laffeber C, Duboc C, Sahin E, Quessada-Vial A, Winterwerp HHK, Sixma TK, Kanaar R, Friedhoff P, Strick TR, Lebbink JHG. Mardenborough YSN, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Dec 16;47(22):11667-11680. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz834. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019. PMID: 31598722 Free PMC article. - Single-molecule visualization reveals the damage search mechanism for the human NER protein XPC-RAD23B.
Cheon NY, Kim HS, Yeo JE, Schärer OD, Lee JY. Cheon NY, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Sep 19;47(16):8337-8347. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz629. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019. PMID: 31372632 Free PMC article. - Coordinating Multi-Protein Mismatch Repair by Managing Diffusion Mechanics on the DNA.
Kim D, Fishel R, Lee JB. Kim D, et al. J Mol Biol. 2018 Oct 26;430(22):4469-4480. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.05.032. Epub 2018 May 21. J Mol Biol. 2018. PMID: 29792877 Free PMC article. Review.
References
- Lahue RS, Au KG, Modrich P. Science. 1989;245:160–164. - PubMed
- Cooper DL, Lahue RS, Modrich P. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:11823–11829. - PubMed
- Viswanathan M, Burdett V, Baitinger C, Modrich P, Lovett ST. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:31053–31058. - PubMed
- Meselson M. In: Recombination of the Genetic Material. Low KB, editor. San Diego: Academic; 1988. pp. 91–113.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases