Comparison of "silent" clustered and sparse temporal fMRI acquisitions in tonal and speech perception tasks - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
. 2007 Oct 1;37(4):1195-204.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.073. Epub 2007 Jun 7.
Affiliations
- PMID: 17644001
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.073
Comparative Study
Comparison of "silent" clustered and sparse temporal fMRI acquisitions in tonal and speech perception tasks
Tino Zaehle et al. Neuroimage. 2007.
Abstract
In the functional imaging of auditory cortical functions, long silent periods between the data acquisitions prevent interferences between scanner noise and the auditory stimulus processing. Recent fMRI studies have shown that sparse temporal acquisition designs are advantageous over continuous scanning protocols on physiological, perceptual, and cognitive levels. Sparse temporal acquisition schemes (STA) which use a single volume acquisition after each trial imply the advantage of auditory stimulation devoid of ambient scanner noise but have the drawback of a reduced statistical power. To alleviate this effect, STA schemes have been extended to clustered-sparse temporal acquisition (CTA) designs which record several subsequent BOLD contrast images in rapid succession. In the present study, we collected data from 13 healthy volunteers performing a speech and a tonal discrimination task using both a CTA and STA scheme to carry out a systematic evaluation of these acquisition protocols. By statistical modeling of the fMRI data sets, we revealed stronger effect sizes for the STA protocol regardless of the task, reflecting the better signal-to-noise-ratio of MR images acquired with this scheme. In contrast, we demonstrate higher statistical power for the use of a CTA protocol. Accordingly, in the context of standard fMRI analysis, the CTA protocol clearly outperformed the STA scheme at the level of single-subject analysis and fixed-effects group analysis. Our results clearly suggest that it is advantageous to acquire several sample points per trial if one wants to use the benefit of "silent" fMRI. Furthermore, our data demonstrate the feasibility of the clustered acquisition of subsequent imaging volumes along the T1-decay.
Similar articles
- Evidence for rapid auditory perception as the foundation of speech processing: a sparse temporal sampling fMRI study.
Zaehle T, Wüstenberg T, Meyer M, Jäncke L. Zaehle T, et al. Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Nov;20(9):2447-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03687.x. Eur J Neurosci. 2004. PMID: 15525285 - Reducing the interval between volume acquisitions improves "sparse" scanning protocols in event-related auditory fMRI.
Liem F, Lutz K, Luechinger R, Jäncke L, Meyer M. Liem F, et al. Brain Topogr. 2012 Apr;25(2):182-93. doi: 10.1007/s10548-011-0206-x. Epub 2011 Oct 21. Brain Topogr. 2012. PMID: 22015572 - Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task.
Schmidt CF, Zaehle T, Meyer M, Geiser E, Boesiger P, Jancke L. Schmidt CF, et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Jan;29(1):46-56. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20372. Hum Brain Mapp. 2008. PMID: 17318832 Free PMC article. - Segmental processing in the human auditory dorsal stream.
Zaehle T, Geiser E, Alter K, Jancke L, Meyer M. Zaehle T, et al. Brain Res. 2008 Jul 18;1220:179-90. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.11.013. Epub 2007 Nov 17. Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18096139 Review. - The effect of physiological noise in phase functional magnetic resonance imaging: from blood oxygen level-dependent effects to direct detection of neuronal currents.
Hagberg GE, Bianciardi M, Brainovich V, Cassarà AM, Maraviglia B. Hagberg GE, et al. Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Sep;26(7):1026-40. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.01.010. Epub 2008 May 13. Magn Reson Imaging. 2008. PMID: 18479875 Review.
Cited by
- Stimulus complexity and categorical effects in human auditory cortex: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.
Samson F, Zeffiro TA, Toussaint A, Belin P. Samson F, et al. Front Psychol. 2011 Jan 17;1:241. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00241. eCollection 2010. Front Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21833294 Free PMC article. - Neuroimaging paradigms for tonotopic mapping (II): the influence of acquisition protocol.
Langers DR, Sanchez-Panchuelo RM, Francis ST, Krumbholz K, Hall DA. Langers DR, et al. Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 15;100:663-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.042. Epub 2014 Jul 25. Neuroimage. 2014. PMID: 25067814 Free PMC article. - Test-retest reliability of fMRI experiments during robot-assisted active and passive stepping.
Jaeger L, Marchal-Crespo L, Wolf P, Riener R, Kollias S, Michels L. Jaeger L, et al. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Nov 17;12:102. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0097-2. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 26577598 Free PMC article. - Right and left perisylvian cortex and left inferior frontal cortex mediate sentence-level rhyme detection in spoken language as revealed by sparse fMRI.
Hurschler MA, Liem F, Jäncke L, Meyer M. Hurschler MA, et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Dec;34(12):3182-92. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22134. Epub 2012 Jun 19. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013. PMID: 22711328 Free PMC article. - Cross-modal deactivations during modality-specific selective attention.
Mozolic JL, Joyner D, Hugenschmidt CE, Peiffer AM, Kraft RA, Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ. Mozolic JL, et al. BMC Neurol. 2008 Sep 25;8:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-8-35. BMC Neurol. 2008. PMID: 18817554 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical