Antisense artifacts in transcriptome microarray experiments are resolved by actinomycin D - PubMed (original) (raw)
Antisense artifacts in transcriptome microarray experiments are resolved by actinomycin D
Fabiana Perocchi et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007.
Abstract
Recent transcription profiling studies have revealed an unanticipatedly large proportion of antisense transcription across eukaryotic and bacterial genomes. However, the extent and significance of antisense transcripts is controversial partly because experimental artifacts are suspected. Here, we present a method to generate clean genome-wide transcriptome profiles, using actinomycin D (ActD) during reverse transcription. We show that antisense artifacts appear to be triggered by spurious synthesis of second-strand cDNA during reverse transcription reactions. Strand-specific hybridization signals obtained from Saccharomyces cerevisiae tiling arrays were compared between samples prepared with and without ActD. Use of ActD removed about half of the detectable antisense transcripts, consistent with their being artifacts, while sense expression levels and about 200 antisense transcripts were not affected. Our findings thus facilitate a more accurate assessment of the extent and position of antisense transcription, towards a better understanding of its role in cells.
Figures
Figure 1.
Hypothetical models for spurious second-strand synthesis by reverse transcription (upper panel) and the mode of inhibition by ActD (lower panel). During sample processing first-strand cDNA is generated from RNA molecules by reverse transcription. Spurious second-strand cDNA synthesis could occur using the first-strand cDNA as a template. Two possible mechanisms are: self-priming through hairpin loop extension of the first-strand cDNA, or re-priming either from RNA fragments formed during degradation of the RNA templates or from primers present in the reaction. In both cases, hybridization to strand-specific arrays would lead to artifactual antisense signals. ActD inhibits second-strand synthesis (lower panel, red cross), putatively by binding to bases of single-stranded DNA molecules, and therefore artifactual antisense-strand signals would not be detected.
Figure 2.
Genome-wide analysis of sense and antisense signals from hybridizations performed in either the absence (ActD−) or presence (ActD+) of ActD during reverse transcription. (A) Dependence of antisense signal intensity on the sense expression level. Red curves represent the fitted hybridization signals using smoothing splines. (B) Variation in signal intensities among biological replicates for the sense and antisense strands (SD). (C) Two examples of spurious antisense transcripts resolved by ActD. (D) Two examples of consistent antisense transcripts unaffected by ActD. In both panels C, and D, normalized signal intensities are shown for probes along their chromosomal position using a color gradient (_x_-axis; W, Watson strand; C, Crick strand). Upper panel, five ActD− replicates (_y_-axis, ActD−, 1–5); lower panel, three ActD+ replicates (_y_-axis, ActD+ 1–3). Profiles for all genomic regions are available online. (
www.ebi.ac.uk/huber-srv/actinomycinD
).
Figure 3.
Scatter plot of segment expression levels between arrays generated with and without ActD. Green dots, antisense segments detected above background in ActD− samples; Red line, identical expression in both conditions; dashed lines, background thresholds.
Figure 4.
Validation of antisense transcripts. (A) Comparison of ActD and computational filtering. Expression level of antisense segments in reactions with (ActD+) and without ActD (ActD−). For ActD− data, only antisense segments which passed the computational filter are shown. The dotted lines represent the background thresholds. Blue dots, segments common between ActD+ and filtered ActD−; orange dots, unique to ActD+; green dots, unique to filtered ActD−. A list of these segments is available (Supplementary Table 4). (B) Strand-specific RT-PCR of antisense transcripts. Three antisense RNAs opposite to MRB1, EPL1 and MRK1 yielded a RT-PCR product. Seven regions for which putative antisense artifacts were detected by array analysis opposite of CYS4, EMP24, PNC1, MDH3, HAC1, TRR1 and PFK1 did not yield a RT-PCR product. ACT1 sense RT-PCR reactions served as internal controls for each individual RT-PCR; –RT designate RT reactions in which the reverse transcriptase was omitted; gDNA indicates PCR reactions with genomic DNA as a template; reactions were performed in triplicate.
Similar articles
- Strand-specific transcriptome profiling with directly labeled RNA on genomic tiling microarrays.
Yu WH, Høvik H, Olsen I, Chen T. Yu WH, et al. BMC Mol Biol. 2011 Jan 14;12:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-12-3. BMC Mol Biol. 2011. PMID: 21235785 Free PMC article. - Genome-wide analysis of antisense transcription with Affymetrix exon array.
Ge X, Rubinstein WS, Jung YC, Wu Q. Ge X, et al. BMC Genomics. 2008 Jan 22;9:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-27. BMC Genomics. 2008. PMID: 18211689 Free PMC article. - Expression profiling of antisense transcripts on DNA arrays.
Werner A, Schmutzler G, Carlile M, Miles CG, Peters H. Werner A, et al. Physiol Genomics. 2007 Feb 12;28(3):294-300. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00127.2006. Epub 2006 Nov 14. Physiol Genomics. 2007. PMID: 17105753 - Genome-wide impact of endogenous antisense transcripts in eukaryotes.
Numata K, Kiyosawa H. Numata K, et al. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2012 Jan 1;17(1):300-15. doi: 10.2741/3928. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2012. PMID: 22201745 Review. - A conserved regulatory role for antisense RNA in meiotic gene expression in yeast.
Chen HM, Neiman AM. Chen HM, et al. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011 Dec;14(6):655-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.09.010. Epub 2011 Sep 29. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011. PMID: 21963111 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- Invading viral DNA triggers dsRNA synthesis by RNA polymerase II to activate antiviral RNA interference in Drosophila.
de Faria IJS, Aguiar ERGR, Olmo RP, Alves da Silva J, Daeffler L, Carthew RW, Imler JL, Marques JT. de Faria IJS, et al. Cell Rep. 2022 Jun 21;39(12):110976. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110976. Cell Rep. 2022. PMID: 35732126 Free PMC article. - Nanopore sequencing of RNA and cDNA molecules in Escherichia coli.
Grünberger F, Ferreira-Cerca S, Grohmann D. Grünberger F, et al. RNA. 2022 Mar;28(3):400-417. doi: 10.1261/rna.078937.121. Epub 2021 Dec 14. RNA. 2022. PMID: 34906997 Free PMC article. - Bias in RNA-seq Library Preparation: Current Challenges and Solutions.
Shi H, Zhou Y, Jia E, Pan M, Bai Y, Ge Q. Shi H, et al. Biomed Res Int. 2021 Apr 19;2021:6647597. doi: 10.1155/2021/6647597. eCollection 2021. Biomed Res Int. 2021. PMID: 33987443 Free PMC article. Review. - Modulation of Bacterial Fitness and Virulence Through Antisense RNAs.
Millar JA, Raghavan R. Millar JA, et al. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Feb 11;10:596277. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.596277. eCollection 2020. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 33747974 Free PMC article. Review. - Integrative characterization of the near-minimal bacterium Mesoplasma florum.
Matteau D, Lachance JC, Grenier F, Gauthier S, Daubenspeck JM, Dybvig K, Garneau D, Knight TF, Jacques PÉ, Rodrigue S. Matteau D, et al. Mol Syst Biol. 2020 Dec;16(12):e9844. doi: 10.15252/msb.20209844. Mol Syst Biol. 2020. PMID: 33331123 Free PMC article.
References
- Mattick JS. RNA regulation: a new genetics? Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004;5:316–323. - PubMed
- Vanhee-Brossollet C, Vaquero C. Do natural antisense transcripts make sense in eukaryotes? Gene. 1998;211:1–9. - PubMed
- Tufarelli C, Stanley JA, Garrick D, Sharpe JA, Ayyub H, Wood WG, Higgs DR. Transcription of antisense RNA leading to gene silencing and methylation as a novel cause of human genetic disease. Nat. Genet. 2003;34:157–165. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- P01 HG000205/HG/NHGRI NIH HHS/United States
- HG000205/HG/NHGRI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 GM068717/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
- F32 HG000205/HG/NHGRI NIH HHS/United States
- GM068717/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases